[andybigbro]

How would you feel if Big Brother decided that the two housemates wth the most votes would then be out head to head and the others chose who to evict.

If they did this, would you feel like it was a ploy to save Marco?

[Niamh.]

If they did that then it would 100% be a ploy to save Marco because it would probably end up being him Vs Georgina

[andybigbro]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

If they did that then it would 100% be a ploy to save Marco because it would probably end up being him Vs Georgina

Do you think they would do something like that?

[Nicky91]

they said there would be no twists

[andybigbro]

Originally Posted by Nicky91

they said there would be no twists

When?

[Nicky91]

Originally Posted by andybigbro

When?

before the nominations i guess, i thought i saw something like that, saying there will be no twists in the first eviction

[andybigbro]

Originally Posted by Nicky91

before the first eviction, i thought i saw something like that, saying there will be no twists in the first eviction

This is Big Brother Nicky, and rules always change

[Nicky91]

Originally Posted by andybigbro

This is Big Brother Nicky, and rules always change

well they shouldn't do that, it will only put off more viewers from watching


and i think the ratings are important to the producers

[Niamh.]

also I'm not sure they'd legally be able to do that when people have spent money voting to evict someone?

[andybigbro]

Originally Posted by Niamh.

also I'm not sure they'd legally be able to do that when people have spent money voting to evict someone?

They did it with Vanessa/Makosi

[armand.kay]

Originally Posted by andybigbro

They did it with Vanessa/Makosi

The public knew when they were voting though.

[andybigbro]

Originally Posted by armand.kay

The public knew when they were voting though.

True but C5 like to mess with people

[Niamh.]

Originally Posted by andybigbro

True but C5 like to mess with people

Yeah but from a legal stand point they would have to tell the people that otherwise it would be fraudulent. People would be demanding their money back if they'd paid to evict a person and he may have had the highest votes but was saved by the HMs. It wouldn't be legal when money is involved, I'm pretty sure

[armand.kay]

Originally Posted by andybigbro

True but C5 like to mess with people

Yeah but they would literally get into trouble if they do this. Think they had to pay a fine and refund people when Nikki was put back into the house after the public had voted her out. Doubt the producers even want to save Marco let alone break the law to keep him in.

[y.winter]

They shouldn't do it. It's deceiving the voters.

[joeysteele]

They have said all rules are out the window now so probably, if they wanted to save a particular housemate, yes they would so so.

[Cal.]

They would usually say if it didn't mean they would definitely be evicted for legal reasons. They said that with Farrah's and Winston's evictions.

[Amy Jade]

They have to tell the voters if there is a twist like that when the vote is opened so it won't happen for this eviction.

[Nicky91]

Originally Posted by Amy Jade

They have to tell the voters if there is a twist like that when the vote is opened so it won't happen for this eviction.

the same thoughts as me

[Josy]

That would be illegal I think, people are spending money to evict