| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
BLM are a very questionable organisation.It's debatable whether their members have been involved in terrorist acts shooting cops etc.Plus many of them are racist.Also imagine if the case being dealt with in court was for something race related.It would not look like a fair trial if the attorney was wearing a BLM badge.I don't think it should be allowed just as(as said above) a KKK badge would more than likely not be allowed.
|
||
|
|
|
|
#2 | |||
|
||||
|
The voice of reason
|
What has BLM got to do with politics, its a hashtag rabble of people who mistakenly think policemen are killing black people because they are evil racist murderers?
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#3 | |||
|
||||
|
self-oscillating
|
A judge is perfectly within their rights to set the tone of behaviour within their courtroom. Lawyers know fine well what constitutes contempt and will have been warned/advised if their behaviour was not acceptable. Someone obviously wanted to try the judges patience and suffered the consequences. If they won't accept the rules of the court, they shouldn't be practising.
|
|||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|