FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
![]() |
#2 | |||
|
||||
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
|
Quote:
Any UK citizenship should be given up the minute someone flies out to join them.
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |||
|
||||
Flag shagger.
|
To be honest, I'm always torn on this question. The people who go out there thinking they're going to be waging some honourable holy war and get there to witness rape, murder, torture anbd other unspeakable carnage... I think it will be a wake up call for some young people who have lived the soft life in the UK. If those people were accepted back on condition, I think they could be instrumental in dissuading other young people from becoming radicalised. It's like drug addicts counselling other drug addicts; they're listened to because those being counselled know they have been there themselves. Obviously it would mean a massive amount of debriefing and keeping a close eye on them, probably forever... but if they could help stop young people making their way to join IS, I think it could be worth a try.
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | |||
|
||||
Likes cars that go boom
|
Quote:
http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/foru...isation&page=3 (post 63)
__________________
![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Yeah good point! Revealing their stories in the media about their unfortunate time in Syria or elsewhere would discourage others from going there. Also, 'the returnees' are constantly monitored by the police and rarely pose a big threat.
__________________
BBUK18: Raph, Isabelle, Arthur and Chanelle
BBUSA19: Jessica, Cody and Mark Last edited by Vladimir; 26-05-2017 at 05:22 PM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | ||
|
|||
User banned
|
It surely depends on what they have done, if they are dangerous we need them off the streets pronto
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
1. How do they plan on implementing that? It's very hard to get rid of someone who's legally in the country.
2. The last time UKIP made promises it turned out to be complete and utter lies. Basically if you lean towards the right go towards the Tories over UKIP.
__________________
![]() Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink and River Song as my Strictly 2025 Sweepstakes, and eventual winner and runner-up of the series. ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||
|
|||
User banned
|
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | ||
|
|||
Remembering Kerry
|
In principle I do agree with this,however not from UKIP.
I found a lot of their launch of the manifesto today mostly unsavoury. It came across intolerant and division creating as with a look UKIPs policies. It is part of an answer but leaves still many questions as to the best Road to go down. Really all political Parties need to get together on this and come up with a universally agreed plan,no single Party only has the likely answer and for sure UKIP hasn't. Last edited by joeysteele; 25-05-2017 at 08:55 PM. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
It is the law that needs changing, making it easy for the scum to understand, you kill and maim people in Britain you get deported, along with your family.
Better still bring back the death penalty for treasonal murdering scum. Break the law, face the consequences. Last edited by smudgie; 25-05-2017 at 07:50 PM. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |||
|
||||
SIGH
|
If they are leaving his country and it's to join ISIS they should never be allowed back under any circumstances. Even if they get out there and 'change their minds' they shouldn't be allowed back. The lunatics just saying they aren't part of it isn't good enough. It should be 'a 'you've made your bed, now lie in it' kinda thing.
__________________
![]() Calling bigotry an opinion is like calling arsenic a flavour. ………….
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | ||
|
|||
User banned
|
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|