[Mitchell]

I once got an infraction for watching a Coronation Street documentary lmao

[James]

Originally Posted by Mitchell

I once got an infraction for watching a Coronation Street documentary lmao

I checked back and you actually got the infraction for using a Coronation Street character's name as a code word for another member, when there was a bit of a pack mentality against the person at the time.

You did say it was a coincidence though, mind you. However that seemed unlikely.

This was in 2013.

[Rob!]

Originally Posted by James

I checked back and you actually got the infraction for using a Coronation Street character's name as a code word for another member, when there was a bit of a pack mentality against the person at the time.

You did say it was a coincidence though, mind you. However that seemed unlikely.

This was in 2013.

Omg remember when Big Brother used to be as on the button as this instead of just sending in security?

[Crimson Dynamo]

see you in 2 weeks

[Smithy]

have fun in holland sis

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Smithy

have fun in holland sis

[Shaun]

Probably shouldn't keep baiting members then LT

[James]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

are you on glue?


Dear LeatherTrumpet,

You have received an infraction at ThisisBigBrother.com - UK TV Forums.

Reason: Insults to other member(s)
-------

-------

If you have too many infractions you may receive a posting ban.

Original Post:
http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/foru....php?p=9574387

Originally Posted by Shaun View Post
Oh LT you've got your facts wrong again


Me:its unlikely


er, I think its a little harsh

i know he is a mod fave ( we all do) but come on

lets see your workings on paper here....

You left out the post where 'says someone who does not have to buy groceries..'. I don't know what you meant but it could be interpreted as a dig at another member.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by James

You left out the post where 'says someone who does not have to buy groceries..'. I don't know what you meant but it could be interpreted as a dig at another member.

if you dont


know what i meant

[James]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

if you dont


know what i meant

Well, I think I do. It looked like a dig.

Anyway, I've answered everything in this thread, so closing.

[Withano]

Seems like an appropriate infraction

[Smithy]

honestly there needs to be some proper rules rather than just infractions given on assumptions on interpretations

[Withano]

I haven't had an infraction in 2017 (apart from one that doesn't count cos its stupid). You guys should be more like me.

[Rob!]

Originally Posted by Withano

I haven't had an infraction in 2017[ ] (apart from one that doesn't count cos its stupid)[/b]. You guys should be more like me.

I think this thread shows we are like you.

[Withano]

Originally Posted by Rob!

I think this thread shows we are like you.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Withano

I haven't had an infraction in 2017 (apart from one that doesn't count cos its stupid). You guys should be more like me.

my point exactly..

[Withano]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

my point exactly..

Tbf, you presumably haven't been infracted for sharing your infraction publicly. What kind of favouritism is that.

[T*]

so that's why you never see Obsession by Calvin Klein anymore

[Denver]

Poor LT being proven a liar

[Smithy]

so if someone said i was obsessed with lady gaga would they be infracted for it?

[James]

Originally Posted by Smithy

so if someone said i was obsessed with lady gaga would they be infracted for it?

Depends on the context. You might welcome the description.

[Rob!]

Originally Posted by James

Depends on the context. You might welcome the description.

It's a bit tenuous though, wouldn't you say?

[Smithy]

Originally Posted by James

Depends on the context. You might welcome the description.

but that just contradicts what you've said about it being an insult…

[James]

Originally Posted by Dominic

and apparently posting the video Mariah Carey - Obsessed is an insult

I just checked back and you posted that video, and a minute later made an obviously insulting post (in words), so the infraction was as much for that.

[Firewire]

Well you'd like to think