[*mazedsalv**]

I laughed.

It was so C5 to do.

[Jase.]

They pulled this **** with Alexander O'Neal too

[Jack_]

Did this ever happen with a removal on C4? I was trying to think earlier but I think most ejections were aired and explained

[Rob!]

Originally Posted by Jack_

Did this ever happen with a removal on C4? I was trying to think earlier but I think most ejections were aired and explained

Coolio remains the only housemate I can think of who’s status was known as “left” instead of “walked” or “evicted” or “removed.”

[Maxxie.]

Originally Posted by Rob!

Coolio remains the only housemate I can think of who’s status was known as “left” instead of “walked” or “evicted” or “removed.”

They still showed Coolio's exit though, the diary room and all. BB told the house he left on "mutual agreement" which is kinda true I guess

[tanussa]

it totally sucks. they make the series for the viewers, they know we would want and deserve an explanation. it really isnt good enough. what could be that bad that they couldnt explain it, even if they have to dilute all the details

[Rob!]

If it’s a legal issue, there’s not a lot that bitching about it is going to achieve. I’m sure we’ll find out what happened in the fullness of time. Rodrigo’s “here I am” sounded reserved, deflated and like someone who knew what was coming. This series more than most on Channel 5, I do actually think they would tell us if they could.

[Maru]

Maybe they are saving the "reasoning" behind his exit for next episode... to extend things a little bit?... bad reasoning, but anything is possible at this point

[Maxxie.]

The funny thing is c5 have been quite good with the public this year, releasing stormy daniels vt etc. So imo if there not showing/explaining the rodrigo situation I think they have a good reason to.

[T*]

it’s shooting themselves in the foot