| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| BB19 Posts about Big Brother 19 UK in 2018. |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | ||
|
|||
|
oh fack off
|
tbf this has clearly been planned for a while (given all the talk of it being a game, and those teasers of the public having more of a say), and normal noms are still continuing
I like it! The only issues I have are A) it should have started this week, B) can they just give us the full US format instead and C) the viewer's nom is GREAT given it's VTS, but WHAT is the point since that person will NEVER, ever be evicted with VTE?
|
||
|
|
|
|
#2 | |||
|
||||
|
pity or pleasure
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||
|
|||
|
0_o
|
I will see how it works out before I judge.
Honestly, as long as its consistent, I am fine with the format changing somewhat. I just don't like when they appear to decide how noms and such will work based on who is up, with it varying from everyone with 1 up...everyone with 2 up...2+ with most up and 3+ with most up. With random 'twists' on top of this. |
||
|
|
|
|
#4 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
|
|||
|
0_o
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
#6 | |||
|
||||
|
No filter
|
I mean presumably they’ve still got to fit shopping tasks AND tasks for housemates to earn money in as well so I guess we’re in for a busy few weeks
__________________
![]() |
|||
|
|
|
|
#7 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
It seemed to me that the producers are going to throw everything they have got at this last series, just to make it memorable.
__________________
Marriage is like a deck of cards - In the beginning it is two hearts and a diamond - By the end you wish you had a club and a spade. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#8 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
I'm not sure i like the sound of the game changer but we'll see
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#9 | |||
|
||||
|
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
...I don’t understand this...was this a BOTS thing..?...
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#11 | |||
|
||||
|
Canadian Royalty
|
Quote:
If this were a one off twist I’d agree that they were clearly trying to manipulate... However it sounds as if this is planned to play out through the series...
__________________
Last edited by kingston; 22-09-2018 at 07:19 AM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#12 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#13 | |||
|
||||
|
This Witch doesn't burn
|
They did it with CBB and there was constant moaning about head to head evictions.
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#14 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#15 | |||
|
||||
|
This Witch doesn't burn
|
What’s your point...? Normal noms produce heads to heads also
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#16 | |||
|
||||
|
Canadian Royalty
|
For what it's worth the nomination rules worked for CBB... It's just that there was little if any variation amongst HM's in who they nominated which resulted in a head to head contest every time...
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#17 | |||
|
||||
|
This Witch doesn't burn
|
Quote:
my point being that people got what they wanted, normal nominations and then moaned because their fave was up in a head to head, no matter what the producers do there seems to be constant moaning and negativity, the forum is dead because of it
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#18 | |||
|
||||
|
Canadian Royalty
|
Not once did they say either of those things... If you want to convince me otherwise I suggest you dig up some quotes...
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#19 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
The shows' producers also met with several fansites to discuss the direction of the show, with it being heavily reported that the show will bring back weekly shopping tasks and a consistent nominations format. Loving the weekly shopping tasks and consistent nomination format. Very back to roots |
|||
|
|
|
|
#20 | |||
|
||||
|
Canadian Royalty
|
Quote:
__________________
Last edited by kingston; 22-09-2018 at 12:31 PM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#21 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
#22 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
They didn't promise "normal nominations" for civilian, they said "more consistent" as in they wouldn't change the rule/method of nomination every single week. |
||
|
|
|
|
#23 | |||
|
||||
|
Canadian Royalty
|
“Normal” nominations weren’t promised for CBB either... They said the rule would be “more consistent” for that series too... People have just assumed that’s what they meant... Just like “back to basics”...
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#24 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
Yes they did. Specifically diary room nominations and the two or more housemates with the most nominations would face eviction.
|
||
|
|
|
|
#25 | ||
|
|||
|
0_o
|
People will moan whatever. See they want normal nominations/a consistent format for nominations, but it this results in the wrong people being up...then they wants twists to ensure that the people that they want to be up are up. Basically. Producers can't win really.
Last edited by Vicky.; 22-09-2018 at 01:04 PM. |
||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|