FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-01-2021, 09:36 PM | #26 | |||
|
||||
Who, Douglas?
|
FYI
Quote:
Last edited by DouglasS; 11-01-2021 at 09:36 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
11-01-2021, 09:42 PM | #27 | |||
|
||||
Not like us.
|
Quote:
As I pointed out in one of the other threads in reply to you, he wasn't censored when he called mexicans, rapists, and described folks chanting "jews will not replace us," as "very fine people." Also, he's the president and internationally known/loved/loathed. He can still communicate, just not on certain platforms. The founding fathers laid out an example where speech could no longer be considered free or protected by the 1st amendment, and that was shouting fire in a crowded theatre. What Trump did is far worse.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
11-01-2021, 09:45 PM | #28 | |||
|
||||
Who, Douglas?
|
Quote:
The definition is clear as day, regardless of whether you agree with censorship or not all you genuinely need is basic literacy to see this is censorship going by the definition. It Does not necessarily mean you have to disagree with, some censorship is arguably good Last edited by DouglasS; 11-01-2021 at 09:47 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
11-01-2021, 09:46 PM | #29 | |||
|
||||
Not like us.
|
Finally, all of those companies will have a terms of service. If you breach that, just like here, and get banned, you're not being censored. I'm guessing inciting violence/riots/hate speech etc, aren't allowed under the ToS.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
11-01-2021, 09:48 PM | #30 | |||
|
||||
♡☯♡☮♡☯♡☮♡
|
the left wing social media site
had me. But then I saw the source was some blog post.
__________________
Spoiler: |
|||
Reply With Quote |
11-01-2021, 09:56 PM | #31 | |||
|
||||
Not like us.
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
11-01-2021, 10:06 PM | #32 | |||
|
||||
Senior Moment
|
When it comes down to it, Amazon isn't legally obligated to give anyone server space, they have the right to refuse anyone to use their servers, because they are their servers.
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
12-01-2021, 07:24 AM | #33 | |||
|
||||
Zumi Zimi Zami
|
Quote:
Pence for example posts in a correct manner and he gets to stay on social media
__________________
Taking part in Strictly Jake's Tibb does Strictly Game. No.1 Fan of Queen Anastasia ''Nastia'' Stan!!!!!! |
|||
Reply With Quote |
12-01-2021, 08:10 AM | #34 | |||
|
||||
The voice of reason
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
12-01-2021, 08:11 AM | #35 | |||
|
||||
The voice of reason
|
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
12-01-2021, 08:33 AM | #36 | |||
|
||||
Haunting Ground
|
It's because allegedly Parler weren't banning the members making the violent content rather than there were violent content on Parler, because as you rightly say all Social Media (and Forums tbh) would be banned.
__________________
"The power of one, the power of two, the power of many." The Acolyte, the world's greatest chant of all time. Last edited by Mystic Mock; 12-01-2021 at 08:34 AM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
12-01-2021, 08:41 AM | #37 | |||
|
||||
Zumi Zimi Zami
|
Quote:
every social media has their rules/policies and i totally support Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Youtube to take on all far right people who do nothing but post hateful nasty content (whom abuse their social media status for the worse, which is not what social media is meant for) also calling it ''censorship'' how ridiculous the people who continue to spread more hate in the world, do not deserve to have freedom of speech if they just abuse it
__________________
Taking part in Strictly Jake's Tibb does Strictly Game. No.1 Fan of Queen Anastasia ''Nastia'' Stan!!!!!! |
|||
Reply With Quote |
12-01-2021, 08:52 AM | #38 | |||
|
||||
The voice of reason
|
Quote:
who is the judge here and what are their credentials? |
|||
Reply With Quote |
12-01-2021, 11:43 AM | #39 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
Saying something is censorship when it isn't won't make it censorship. Repeating something incorrect because it benefits your agenda does not validate it.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
12-01-2021, 12:09 PM | #40 | |||
|
||||
Who, Douglas?
|
Quote:
I thought as an author you would understand the meanings of words such as censorship, and understand definitions and meanings. Just because it’s censorship doesn’t mean it’s always a bad thing, a lot of things get censored for good reasons Last edited by DouglasS; 12-01-2021 at 12:09 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
12-01-2021, 12:26 PM | #41 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
Quote:
You're not grasping the concept beyond the basic idea because doing so invalidates your point. Freedom of Speech is just that, you are free to speak and believe what you want to believe but freedom of speech does not entitle you to use a private platform against the owner's wishes. Imagine you own a house and and you invite someone in but they are destructive and and they break something, it would be within your rights to tell them to get out, breaking the TOS of a social media site is no different. You agree to follow the rules of the site and when you do not, it's up to them if they want to keep you around. |
||
Reply With Quote |
22-01-2021, 02:48 PM | #42 | ||
|
|||
0_o
|
That was my first thought, not gunna lie
I kind of see where cases like this are coming from,. but at the end of the day, amazon is a private company, and can ban whoever they see fit, for any reason tbh.
__________________
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|