About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

farhad · 17-07-2007, 09:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Richie
Hello?

Did you not watch BB5? BB5 is the best... obviously.

If it won NTA than ok, but it didn't.

farhad · 18-07-2007, 12:16 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by farhad

Quote:

Originally posted by Richie
Hello?

Did you not watch BB5? BB5 is the best... obviously.

If it won NTA than ok, but it didn't.

JeanP! · 18-07-2007, 12:21 AM

I hated that Series
I hated Pete, the ****in winner
I hated Nikki
I hated Richard
I hated Grace
I hated Dawn
I hated the twist

The only person that was okay in that series was Lea or Susie or Aisleyne

Rory · 18-07-2007, 12:24 AM

Let's get serious, BB7 was a house of freaks. I didn't really find that entertaining. It was predictable and the twists were very disappointing.

Wasted · 18-07-2007, 12:32 AM

BB7 is nothing compared to BB5. In BB5 the twists and Evil Big Brother were a brand new concept, a concept that tired by BB7. There were too many twists, and most of them were an anti-climax. There were far too many housemates, far too many newcomers. A twist happened almost every couple of days, it was very inconsistent to the original format for this reason. If someone had been watching Big Brother for the first time last year they probably would've been confused by the actual format, because the producers failed to stick to it because of too many twists.

The housemates were poor as well, some of them were very good but you couldn't honestly say that as an entire cast they were great, because they weren't. A series like BB5 had a great cast, because almost all of the housemates brought something to the show, even if you disliked them. There was an extreme lack of maturity from the housemates as well in BB7, and a lack of intelligent conversation. It got very boring coming up to the last few weeks.

There were too many people at the final night as well. They should've evicted two of the six during the final week, I think any more than 4 people is too much for a final night, because it seemed like that whole show, all the interviews etc. were crammed into a tight schedule.

farhad · 18-07-2007, 12:41 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Wasted
BB7 is nothing compared to BB5. In BB5 the twists and Evil Big Brother were a brand new concept, a concept that tired by BB7. There were too many twists, and most of them were an anti-climax. There were far too many housemates, far too many newcomers. A twist happened almost every couple of days, it was very inconsistent to the original format for this reason. If someone had been watching Big Brother for the first time last year they probably would've been confused by the actual format, because the producers failed to stick to it because of too many twists.

The housemates were poor as well, some of them were very good but you couldn't honestly say that as an entire cast they were great, because they weren't. A series like BB5 had a great cast, because almost all of the housemates brought something to the show, even if you disliked them. There was an extreme lack of maturity from the housemates as well in BB7, and a lack of intelligent conversation. It got very boring coming up to the last few weeks.

There were too many people at the final night as well. They should've evicted two of the six during the final week, I think any more than 4 people is too much for a final night, because it seemed like that whole show, all the interviews etc. were crammed into a tight schedule.

\bb7 had lots of Drama and include the most entertaining housemate ever that is nikki Grahame, so deal with it.

Billy · 18-07-2007, 12:42 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by farhad

Quote:

Originally posted by Wasted
BB7 is nothing compared to BB5. In BB5 the twists and Evil Big Brother were a brand new concept, a concept that tired by BB7. There were too many twists, and most of them were an anti-climax. There were far too many housemates, far too many newcomers. A twist happened almost every couple of days, it was very inconsistent to the original format for this reason. If someone had been watching Big Brother for the first time last year they probably would've been confused by the actual format, because the producers failed to stick to it because of too many twists.

The housemates were poor as well, some of them were very good but you couldn't honestly say that as an entire cast they were great, because they weren't. A series like BB5 had a great cast, because almost all of the housemates brought something to the show, even if you disliked them. There was an extreme lack of maturity from the housemates as well in BB7, and a lack of intelligent conversation. It got very boring coming up to the last few weeks.

There were too many people at the final night as well. They should've evicted two of the six during the final week, I think any more than 4 people is too much for a final night, because it seemed like that whole show, all the interviews etc. were crammed into a tight schedule.

\bb7 had lots of Drama and include the most entertaining housemate ever that is nikki Grahame, so deal with it.

Tracey, how did you get out of the house?? BB5 had lots of drama too, and the incident that is fight night

farhad · 18-07-2007, 12:44 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by potentialsuperstar

Quote:

Originally posted by farhad

Quote:

Originally posted by Wasted
BB7 is nothing compared to BB5. In BB5 the twists and Evil Big Brother were a brand new concept, a concept that tired by BB7. There were too many twists, and most of them were an anti-climax. There were far too many housemates, far too many newcomers. A twist happened almost every couple of days, it was very inconsistent to the original format for this reason. If someone had been watching Big Brother for the first time last year they probably would've been confused by the actual format, because the producers failed to stick to it because of too many twists.

The housemates were poor as well, some of them were very good but you couldn't honestly say that as an entire cast they were great, because they weren't. A series like BB5 had a great cast, because almost all of the housemates brought something to the show, even if you disliked them. There was an extreme lack of maturity from the housemates as well in BB7, and a lack of intelligent conversation. It got very boring coming up to the last few weeks.

There were too many people at the final night as well. They should've evicted two of the six during the final week, I think any more than 4 people is too much for a final night, because it seemed like that whole show, all the interviews etc. were crammed into a tight schedule.

\bb7 had lots of Drama and include the most entertaining housemate ever that is nikki Grahame, so deal with it.

Tracey, how did you get out of the house?? BB5 had lots of drama too, and the incident that is fight night

So why did it not win NTA, or award for contestants.

Wasted · 18-07-2007, 12:45 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by farhad

Quote:

Originally posted by Wasted
BB7 is nothing compared to BB5. In BB5 the twists and Evil Big Brother were a brand new concept, a concept that tired by BB7. There were too many twists, and most of them were an anti-climax. There were far too many housemates, far too many newcomers. A twist happened almost every couple of days, it was very inconsistent to the original format for this reason. If someone had been watching Big Brother for the first time last year they probably would've been confused by the actual format, because the producers failed to stick to it because of too many twists.

The housemates were poor as well, some of them were very good but you couldn't honestly say that as an entire cast they were great, because they weren't. A series like BB5 had a great cast, because almost all of the housemates brought something to the show, even if you disliked them. There was an extreme lack of maturity from the housemates as well in BB7, and a lack of intelligent conversation. It got very boring coming up to the last few weeks.

There were too many people at the final night as well. They should've evicted two of the six during the final week, I think any more than 4 people is too much for a final night, because it seemed like that whole show, all the interviews etc. were crammed into a tight schedule.

\bb7 had lots of Drama and include the most entertaining housemate ever that is nikki Grahame, so deal with it.

It did have lots of drama and a few entertaining housemates, but those housemates took most of the spotlight which is a bad thing.

And Nikki was entertaining but by week 5 or 6 she was well past her sell by date. Her only success up to date since the show is down to the fact she's been constantly shoved down our throats by her deluded promoters. And that's my opinion, so deal with it.

spitfire · 18-07-2007, 12:45 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by farhadbb7 had lots of Drama and include the most entertaining housemate ever that is nikki Grahame,

In your opinion maybe,i totally agree with wasted.

Quote:

Originally posted by farhadso deal with it.

You sound like Wurzel.

farhad · 18-07-2007, 12:48 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Wasted

Quote:

Originally posted by farhad

Quote:

Originally posted by Wasted
BB7 is nothing compared to BB5. In BB5 the twists and Evil Big Brother were a brand new concept, a concept that tired by BB7. There were too many twists, and most of them were an anti-climax. There were far too many housemates, far too many newcomers. A twist happened almost every couple of days, it was very inconsistent to the original format for this reason. If someone had been watching Big Brother for the first time last year they probably would've been confused by the actual format, because the producers failed to stick to it because of too many twists.

The housemates were poor as well, some of them were very good but you couldn't honestly say that as an entire cast they were great, because they weren't. A series like BB5 had a great cast, because almost all of the housemates brought something to the show, even if you disliked them. There was an extreme lack of maturity from the housemates as well in BB7, and a lack of intelligent conversation. It got very boring coming up to the last few weeks.

There were too many people at the final night as well. They should've evicted two of the six during the final week, I think any more than 4 people is too much for a final night, because it seemed like that whole show, all the interviews etc. were crammed into a tight schedule.

\bb7 had lots of Drama and include the most entertaining housemate ever that is nikki Grahame, so deal with it.

It did have lots of drama and a few entertaining housemates, but those housemates took most of the spotlight which is a bad thing.

And Nikki was entertaining but by week 5 or 6 she was well past her sell by date. Her only success up to date since the show is down to the fact she's been constantly shoved down our throats by her deluded promoters. And that's my opinion, so deal with it.

Nikki was entertaining until those boring clones took over and isolated her, BB7 has the best Diary room moments, BB5 had but not better than BB7, and why do you think media is shoving nikki in our throat, why not any other BB5 dullards.

Wasted · 18-07-2007, 12:49 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by farhad

Quote:

Originally posted by potentialsuperstar

Quote:

Originally posted by farhad

Quote:

Originally posted by Wasted
BB7 is nothing compared to BB5. In BB5 the twists and Evil Big Brother were a brand new concept, a concept that tired by BB7. There were too many twists, and most of them were an anti-climax. There were far too many housemates, far too many newcomers. A twist happened almost every couple of days, it was very inconsistent to the original format for this reason. If someone had been watching Big Brother for the first time last year they probably would've been confused by the actual format, because the producers failed to stick to it because of too many twists.

The housemates were poor as well, some of them were very good but you couldn't honestly say that as an entire cast they were great, because they weren't. A series like BB5 had a great cast, because almost all of the housemates brought something to the show, even if you disliked them. There was an extreme lack of maturity from the housemates as well in BB7, and a lack of intelligent conversation. It got very boring coming up to the last few weeks.

There were too many people at the final night as well. They should've evicted two of the six during the final week, I think any more than 4 people is too much for a final night, because it seemed like that whole show, all the interviews etc. were crammed into a tight schedule.

\bb7 had lots of Drama and include the most entertaining housemate ever that is nikki Grahame, so deal with it.

Tracey, how did you get out of the house?? BB5 had lots of drama too, and the incident that is fight night

So why did it not win NTA, or award for contestants.

Does it matter? Pete won BB7, doesn't necessarily mean he was a great housemate, he most certainly wasn't. So just because BB7 won an NTA, doesn't necessarily mean it was a great series. And it doesn't necessarily mean Nikki was a great reality TV show competitor.

It's only a matter of opinion anyway, we all have our favourite series and we won't always like the same ones.

farhad · 18-07-2007, 12:55 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Wasted

Quote:

Originally posted by farhad

Quote:

Originally posted by potentialsuperstar

Quote:

Originally posted by farhad

Quote:

Originally posted by Wasted
BB7 is nothing compared to BB5. In BB5 the twists and Evil Big Brother were a brand new concept, a concept that tired by BB7. There were too many twists, and most of them were an anti-climax. There were far too many housemates, far too many newcomers. A twist happened almost every couple of days, it was very inconsistent to the original format for this reason. If someone had been watching Big Brother for the first time last year they probably would've been confused by the actual format, because the producers failed to stick to it because of too many twists.

The housemates were poor as well, some of them were very good but you couldn't honestly say that as an entire cast they were great, because they weren't. A series like BB5 had a great cast, because almost all of the housemates brought something to the show, even if you disliked them. There was an extreme lack of maturity from the housemates as well in BB7, and a lack of intelligent conversation. It got very boring coming up to the last few weeks.

There were too many people at the final night as well. They should've evicted two of the six during the final week, I think any more than 4 people is too much for a final night, because it seemed like that whole show, all the interviews etc. were crammed into a tight schedule.

\bb7 had lots of Drama and include the most entertaining housemate ever that is nikki Grahame, so deal with it.

Tracey, how did you get out of the house?? BB5 had lots of drama too, and the incident that is fight night

So why did it not win NTA, or award for contestants.

Does it matter? Pete won BB7, doesn't necessarily mean he was a great housemate, he most certainly wasn't. So just because BB7 won an NTA, doesn't necessarily mean it was a great series. And it doesn't necessarily mean Nikki was a great reality TV show competitor.

It's only a matter of opinion anyway, we all have our favourite series and we won't always like the same ones.

Why didn't ITV judges create a NTA for best reality TV contender during BB5, and why isn't in this years category, this could be BB7 created these stuff because how entertaining it was compared to previous series, and that happened because of one person as we know who.

Billy · 18-07-2007, 12:55 AM

it IS in the NTA this year

farhad · 18-07-2007, 12:59 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by potentialsuperstar
it IS in the NTA this year

Best reality Tv contestant not in the category this year, hmmm guess why.

Matt · 18-07-2007, 01:04 AM

Let me guess: BB7 was the best because it had Nikki in it?

Billy · 18-07-2007, 01:05 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by farhad

Quote:

Originally posted by potentialsuperstar
it IS in the NTA this year

Best reality Tv contestant not in the category this year, hmmm guess why.

Maybe because, there COULD be more entering

JeanP! · 18-07-2007, 01:05 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by farhad

Quote:

Originally posted by Wasted
BB7 is nothing compared to BB5. In BB5 the twists and Evil Big Brother were a brand new concept, a concept that tired by BB7. There were too many twists, and most of them were an anti-climax. There were far too many housemates, far too many newcomers. A twist happened almost every couple of days, it was very inconsistent to the original format for this reason. If someone had been watching Big Brother for the first time last year they probably would've been confused by the actual format, because the producers failed to stick to it because of too many twists.

The housemates were poor as well, some of them were very good but you couldn't honestly say that as an entire cast they were great, because they weren't. A series like BB5 had a great cast, because almost all of the housemates brought something to the show, even if you disliked them. There was an extreme lack of maturity from the housemates as well in BB7, and a lack of intelligent conversation. It got very boring coming up to the last few weeks.

There were too many people at the final night as well. They should've evicted two of the six during the final week, I think any more than 4 people is too much for a final night, because it seemed like that whole show, all the interviews etc. were crammed into a tight schedule.

\bb7 had lots of Drama and include the most entertaining housemate ever that is nikki Grahame, so deal with it.

Nikki the most entertaining housemate ever?, she was the mos annoying housemate ever too

farhad · 18-07-2007, 01:07 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Matt
Let me guess: BB7 was the best because it had Nikki in it?

yep, thats very true

Wasted · 18-07-2007, 01:07 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by farhad

Quote:

Originally posted by Wasted

Quote:

Originally posted by farhad

Quote:

Originally posted by potentialsuperstar

Quote:

Originally posted by farhad

Quote:

Originally posted by Wasted
BB7 is nothing compared to BB5. In BB5 the twists and Evil Big Brother were a brand new concept, a concept that tired by BB7. There were too many twists, and most of them were an anti-climax. There were far too many housemates, far too many newcomers. A twist happened almost every couple of days, it was very inconsistent to the original format for this reason. If someone had been watching Big Brother for the first time last year they probably would've been confused by the actual format, because the producers failed to stick to it because of too many twists.

The housemates were poor as well, some of them were very good but you couldn't honestly say that as an entire cast they were great, because they weren't. A series like BB5 had a great cast, because almost all of the housemates brought something to the show, even if you disliked them. There was an extreme lack of maturity from the housemates as well in BB7, and a lack of intelligent conversation. It got very boring coming up to the last few weeks.

There were too many people at the final night as well. They should've evicted two of the six during the final week, I think any more than 4 people is too much for a final night, because it seemed like that whole show, all the interviews etc. were crammed into a tight schedule.

\bb7 had lots of Drama and include the most entertaining housemate ever that is nikki Grahame, so deal with it.

Tracey, how did you get out of the house?? BB5 had lots of drama too, and the incident that is fight night

So why did it not win NTA, or award for contestants.

Does it matter? Pete won BB7, doesn't necessarily mean he was a great housemate, he most certainly wasn't. So just because BB7 won an NTA, doesn't necessarily mean it was a great series. And it doesn't necessarily mean Nikki was a great reality TV show competitor.

It's only a matter of opinion anyway, we all have our favourite series and we won't always like the same ones.

Why didn't ITV judges create a NTA for best reality TV contender during BB5, and why isn't in this years category, this could be BB7 created these stuff because how entertaining it was compared to previous series, and that happened because of one person as we know who.

I'm just going to quote myself again;

Quote:

Does it matter? Pete won BB7, doesn't necessarily mean he was a great housemate, he most certainly wasn't. So just because BB7 won an NTA, doesn't necessarily mean it was a great series. And it doesn't necessarily mean Nikki was a great reality TV show competitor.

And who was Nikki up against for that award anyway? I know she was up against Pete, but almost anyone would deserve to win against him.

And surely you could explain why Nikki was a brilliant housemate instead of making references to the awards she's won?

They might not have thought of that award during BB5 anyway if they never created it back then. Simple as that. I'm sure if Nikki was up against any of the characters of that year, she wouldn't have won, but those housemates didn't have that chance to win the award like Nikki did, so you can't really use it to suggest she is a better housemate than any of them.

farhad · 18-07-2007, 01:08 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jp!

Quote:

Originally posted by farhad

Quote:

Originally posted by Wasted
BB7 is nothing compared to BB5. In BB5 the twists and Evil Big Brother were a brand new concept, a concept that tired by BB7. There were too many twists, and most of them were an anti-climax. There were far too many housemates, far too many newcomers. A twist happened almost every couple of days, it was very inconsistent to the original format for this reason. If someone had been watching Big Brother for the first time last year they probably would've been confused by the actual format, because the producers failed to stick to it because of too many twists.

The housemates were poor as well, some of them were very good but you couldn't honestly say that as an entire cast they were great, because they weren't. A series like BB5 had a great cast, because almost all of the housemates brought something to the show, even if you disliked them. There was an extreme lack of maturity from the housemates as well in BB7, and a lack of intelligent conversation. It got very boring coming up to the last few weeks.

There were too many people at the final night as well. They should've evicted two of the six during the final week, I think any more than 4 people is too much for a final night, because it seemed like that whole show, all the interviews etc. were crammed into a tight schedule.

\bb7 had lots of Drama and include the most entertaining housemate ever that is nikki Grahame, so deal with it.

Nikki the most entertaining housemate ever?, she was the mos annoying housemate ever too

Every contestant have been annoying, Nikki was annoying and also funny and cute.

Wasted · 18-07-2007, 01:09 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by farhad

Quote:

Originally posted by potentialsuperstar
it IS in the NTA this year

Best reality Tv contestant not in the category this year, hmmm guess why.

Because the first time they used it last year, someone as undeserving as Nikki won somehow, so they don't want to take that risk again?

JeanP! · 18-07-2007, 01:09 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by farhad

Quote:

Originally posted by Jp!

Quote:

Originally posted by farhad

Quote:

Originally posted by Wasted
BB7 is nothing compared to BB5. In BB5 the twists and Evil Big Brother were a brand new concept, a concept that tired by BB7. There were too many twists, and most of them were an anti-climax. There were far too many housemates, far too many newcomers. A twist happened almost every couple of days, it was very inconsistent to the original format for this reason. If someone had been watching Big Brother for the first time last year they probably would've been confused by the actual format, because the producers failed to stick to it because of too many twists.

The housemates were poor as well, some of them were very good but you couldn't honestly say that as an entire cast they were great, because they weren't. A series like BB5 had a great cast, because almost all of the housemates brought something to the show, even if you disliked them. There was an extreme lack of maturity from the housemates as well in BB7, and a lack of intelligent conversation. It got very boring coming up to the last few weeks.

There were too many people at the final night as well. They should've evicted two of the six during the final week, I think any more than 4 people is too much for a final night, because it seemed like that whole show, all the interviews etc. were crammed into a tight schedule.

\bb7 had lots of Drama and include the most entertaining housemate ever that is nikki Grahame, so deal with it.

Nikki the most entertaining housemate ever?, she was the mos annoying housemate ever too

Every contestant have been annoying, Nikki was annoying and also funny and cute.

Cute?

Omg she was so rubbish

Matt · 18-07-2007, 01:09 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by farhad

Quote:

Originally posted by Matt
Let me guess: BB7 was the best because it had Nikki in it?

yep, thats very true

Oh my god.

In which case, BB8 is the best because it has Gerry in it.

farhad · 18-07-2007, 01:12 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Wasted

Quote:

Originally posted by farhad

Quote:

Originally posted by Wasted

Quote:

Originally posted by farhad

Quote:

Originally posted by potentialsuperstar

Quote:

Originally posted by farhad

Quote:

Originally posted by Wasted
BB7 is nothing compared to BB5. In BB5 the twists and Evil Big Brother were a brand new concept, a concept that tired by BB7. There were too many twists, and most of them were an anti-climax. There were far too many housemates, far too many newcomers. A twist happened almost every couple of days, it was very inconsistent to the original format for this reason. If someone had been watching Big Brother for the first time last year they probably would've been confused by the actual format, because the producers failed to stick to it because of too many twists.

The housemates were poor as well, some of them were very good but you couldn't honestly say that as an entire cast they were great, because they weren't. A series like BB5 had a great cast, because almost all of the housemates brought something to the show, even if you disliked them. There was an extreme lack of maturity from the housemates as well in BB7, and a lack of intelligent conversation. It got very boring coming up to the last few weeks.

There were too many people at the final night as well. They should've evicted two of the six during the final week, I think any more than 4 people is too much for a final night, because it seemed like that whole show, all the interviews etc. were crammed into a tight schedule.

\bb7 had lots of Drama and include the most entertaining housemate ever that is nikki Grahame, so deal with it.

Tracey, how did you get out of the house?? BB5 had lots of drama too, and the incident that is fight night

So why did it not win NTA, or award for contestants.

Does it matter? Pete won BB7, doesn't necessarily mean he was a great housemate, he most certainly wasn't. So just because BB7 won an NTA, doesn't necessarily mean it was a great series. And it doesn't necessarily mean Nikki was a great reality TV show competitor.

It's only a matter of opinion anyway, we all have our favourite series and we won't always like the same ones.

Why didn't ITV judges create a NTA for best reality TV contender during BB5, and why isn't in this years category, this could be BB7 created these stuff because how entertaining it was compared to previous series, and that happened because of one person as we know who.

I'm just going to quote myself again;

Quote:

Does it matter? Pete won BB7, doesn't necessarily mean he was a great housemate, he most certainly wasn't. So just because BB7 won an NTA, doesn't necessarily mean it was a great series. And it doesn't necessarily mean Nikki was a great reality TV show competitor.

And who was Nikki up against for that award anyway? I know she was up against Pete, but almost anyone would deserve to win against him.

And surely you could explain why Nikki was a brilliant housemate instead of making references to the awards she's won?

They might not have thought of that award during BB5 anyway if they never created it back then. Simple as that. I'm sure if Nikki was up against any of the characters of that year, she wouldn't have won, but those housemates didn't have that chance to win the award like Nikki did, so you can't really use it to suggest she is a better housemate than any of them.

These BB5 housemate are 10 penny worth to some is over a milliom pounds, so whay did they not think of it then, was the award created mainly for the great grahame, so she walks away winning something, because she did not win BB. even if she was in BB5, not victors or Basses or nadia's would come close to legendary entertainer.

Site Navigation

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com