[the_chosen_one]

Originally posted by bananarama
Massive multiple voting doesn't generate a deserving winner. It simply mean those who can afford get their way over and above those who cannot afford to throw money to the wind.

That's true.

It's not a vote, more like a bidding war. Whoever's daft enough to blow the most money.

It's a poor reflection on the winner, really. Whoever wins obviously has the stupidest fans.

[bananarama]

Originally posted by SHAUNi-X
i dont get what every1 is saying about us supporters being rich and buying brian as a winner ?!?! can you explain and if i am wrong i apoligise

brian to win i have voted between 200-300 times now and i will on the final aswell

Ok it's simple enough. You can afford to vote 200-300 times for your favourite at a cost of up to £75.

Someone with only say £5 to spare will vote for thier favourite.

Result the richest ones buy the winner because they stream in more votes.....

Imagine a General election that allowed multiple voting....The richest would always win.....

The only way to know which housemate is GENUINLY popular is if we all had one vote and one vote only.

Multiple voting distorts the reality of a reality show.....

[GlitterEyes]

I can understand people voting alot of times if they are related or actually know the person in question but otherwise it is certainly a waste of money.