About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

AngRemembered · 03-09-2008, 05:37 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by rayheartbliss

Quote:

Originally posted by Dan_
Hopefully not, Big Brother is meant to be a entertainment show and Rachel's totally failed on that count.Sure she's a really nice person and would probably be lovely to have as a neighbour but in terms of watching her,it's just a snoozefest.

its meant to be a social experiment...

AngRemembered · 03-09-2008, 05:38 PM

When did we see a HL show with Rachel asleep?

When has BB warned the HOH to keep everyone awake and its been because Rachel has dozed off?

Rex definately Darnell occasionally Mikey a few times, Sara once.. for an "entertainment" show sleepers make the HIGH LIGHTS!!!!!!
Why is Rachel so boring, whatever she is doing whilst not being dead to the world like her other finalists, its sure gotta be better than that.

What is boring about being yourself?, I notice similarities between the tibb game Eliminator and its live feed, and every day Rachel...
They/We managed a grand total of 404 ish pages of every day conversation, it was popular and rightly so, as it involved everyone just being themselves, I cant recall anyone refusing to vote in that game as a contestant was simply "boring", indeed the eventual winner was just that, and every day nice guy called Marc, not a stand up comic, not a singer, and not the next James Bond either, you could say he was boring like Rachel, but I and the people who voted in the game thought he was a genuinely nice guy who loved the game and made the effort.

The truth is none of them are entertaining, name one ex HM who has toured the UK and released an album, name one filling Hackney empire with his/her stand up routine, olympic winner anyone? anthing apart from still pics in a mag anyone?
The show and the clash of differing personalities is the entertainment, not the individuals they are ALL notoriously ordinary if not boring.
Just like our eliminator game, ordinary people chatting ordinary things, treating there peers with honest respect, but thoroughly enjoying the experience, and as they will agree fabulously entertaining a game it was.

My theory is boring has a new definition on tibb, it means "I cant think of any reason to dislike" and because we dont have to entertain on this forum, its so much easier to type the word boring instead of thinking of a real unique reason, especially when it comes to someone with a "nice" personality like Rachel.

What I cant understand is..why?

rayheartbliss · 03-09-2008, 05:39 PM

of course shel win

Dan_ · 03-09-2008, 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by rayheartbliss

Quote:

Originally posted by Dan_
Hopefully not, Big Brother is meant to be a entertainment show and Rachel's totally failed on that count.Sure she's a really nice person and would probably be lovely to have as a neighbour but in terms of watching her,it's just a snoozefest.

its meant to be a social experiment...

It wouldn't still be on tv if it was just to provide a social experiment rather than entertainment.

rayheartbliss · 03-09-2008, 05:43 PM

but the entertainment just goes a long...
they dont put entertainers in the house...they pick up people from the streets...
thats why being entertaining doesnt make you a winner..if your ugly inside!

BBkid · 03-09-2008, 05:48 PM

I think she'll be 2nd or 3rd.

Dan_ · 03-09-2008, 05:51 PM

They go through an audition process and they pick out the people that they think the public will be interested in, you're not going to just watch a social experiment involving people that barely add anything worthy of talking about.

For me it's got be a combination of entertainment and liking the person to actually bother to vote for them.Rachel might be a really nice person but there's nothing else that she's done to really stand enough for me to bother to pick up the phone and use my money to vote for her to win.

AngRemembered · 03-09-2008, 06:01 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Dan_
They go through an audition process and they pick out the people that they think the public will be interested in, you're not going to just watch a social experiment involving people that barely add anything worthy of talking about.

For me it's got be a combination of entertainment and liking the person to actually bother to vote for them.Rachel might be a really nice person but there's nothing else that she's done to really stand enough for me to bother to pick up the phone and use my money to vote for her to win.

so what have the others done so differnetly to be worthy and entertaining individuals.

To help you we'll include every series, and you name one who's individual entertainment qualities have given them a career in the entertainment world and sustained it over a period of time.
Even the master of all z list nobodies Max Clifford has struggled to get careers going for some of them, but if winners of BB were purely picked on level of entertaining then you wont be struggling to name one "mega star"

will you?

cutekidxox · 03-09-2008, 06:13 PM

rachel 2 win wooooo =]

bee-ash · 03-09-2008, 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by cutekidxox
rachel 2 win wooooo =]

Dan_ · 03-09-2008, 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Angiebabe

Quote:

Originally posted by Dan_
They go through an audition process and they pick out the people that they think the public will be interested in, you're not going to just watch a social experiment involving people that barely add anything worthy of talking about.

For me it's got be a combination of entertainment and liking the person to actually bother to vote for them.Rachel might be a really nice person but there's nothing else that she's done to really stand enough for me to bother to pick up the phone and use my money to vote for her to win.

so what have the others done so differnetly to be worthy and entertaining individuals.

To help you we'll include every series, and you name one who's individual entertainment qualities have given them a career in the entertainment world and sustained it over a period of time.
Even the mast of all z list nobodies Max Clifford has struggled to get careers going for some of them, but if winners of BB were purely picked on level of entertaining then you wont be struggling to name one "mega star"

will you?

For me,Mikey is someone that I do find entertaining to watch and also likeable.What I find entertaining about him is honesty and ability to just tell it like it is.At times I've also found him to be very funny, there's just certain things he does like with eating the chilli that make me laugh.I guess you either find someone interesting to watch or not.

Brian Dowling has done tv presenting for quite a few years but other than that nothing much of note.Obviously being an entertaining housemate, that people find interesting to watch is different from actually having a talent to sustain a career in the business though.Whilst they might have a personality that people find interesting to watch on a show like Big Brother, there's not a whole that they can do from just that alone.

AirWalk · 03-09-2008, 06:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by rayheartbliss
but the entertainment just goes a long...
they dont put entertainers in the house...they pick up people from the streets...
thats why being entertaining doesnt make you a winner..if your ugly inside!

Well said mate

AngRemembered · 03-09-2008, 06:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Dan_

Brian Dowling has done tv presenting for quite a few years but other than that nothing much of note.Obviously being an entertaining housemate, that people find interesting to watch is different from actually having a talent to sustain a career in the business though.Whilst they might have a personality that people find interesting to watch on a show like Big Brother, there's not a whole that they can do from just that alone.

I really appreciate your time in answering Dan, thanks. and
I agree Mikey is another natural "in the game for experience" likeable guy (with some bad habits) I see him exactly like Rachel et al.

Thats my point, what makes Rachel so different, in this histeria to prove her boring almost like its an offence

They (non extreme dislikeable charectors) are all as boring or entertaining as each other on a social expirement made for entertainment purposes.
The star of the show is the concept itself as Rayheartbliss said, and I agree with your answer to Brian Dowling too (another likeable man if nothing else) and another exaple individual entertainment qualities are not the criteria one looks for to be successful in BB.

razorbladeromance · 03-09-2008, 09:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by rayheartbliss

Quote:

Originally posted by Dan_
Hopefully not, Big Brother is meant to be a entertainment show and Rachel's totally failed on that count.Sure she's a really nice person and would probably be lovely to have as a neighbour but in terms of watching her,it's just a snoozefest.

its meant to be a social experiment...

No it is not. It has not been a social experiment since series 2.

ListenSon · 03-09-2008, 09:28 PM

the british public aint mugs

they can see the girls a joke. She might not be fake but shes still a pillock, shes boring man!!!

darnell should win it or mikey

Jackie · 03-09-2008, 09:30 PM

Racheal stands a chance of winning.

DeonLime · 03-09-2008, 09:40 PM

I think is a 40 - 40 between Sara and Rachel. I´ll give Rex 15 % and Mikey 5 %. Darnell is out.

trasadkel · 03-09-2008, 09:47 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by rayheartbliss

Quote:

Originally posted by Dan_
Hopefully not, Big Brother is meant to be a entertainment show and Rachel's totally failed on that count.Sure she's a really nice person and would probably be lovely to have as a neighbour but in terms of watching her,it's just a snoozefest.

its meant to be a social experiment...

Totally agree. I am bemused as to who seriously thinks that she deserves to win. In terms of entertainment she has been totally non existant.