[NettoSuperstar!]

Originally posted by ange7
I liked how she deflected every answer in every interview with a torrent of thanks yous. "Rachel .. everyone hated you ..why do you think that was?"
"well it's the people that decide ..and they picked me so thankyou, to everyone that voted thank you. Thank you to those that believed in me...oh and thank you to all that that......"
blah blah. ... she ought to come with a snooze button on her head.

She'd make a good politician! I can just see them all nodding off in the commons now!!!

[Tom4784]

She's a good winner but she's not more deserving then Craig and Nadia. They were great winners.

[carlcon]

Yeah I'd put Kate and Brian Dowling ahead of Rach, that's all though. Kate would be my favourite. I was never a big fan of Brian's, but appreciate he was a great HM.

Nadia won out of pity, and most of the others were idiots.

[Tom4784]

Originally posted by carlcon
Yeah I'd put Kate and Brian Dowling ahead of Rach, that's all though. Kate would be my favourite. I was never a big fan of Brian's, but appreciate he was a great HM.

Nadia won out of pity, and most of the others were idiots.

Kate! I forgot about her, She was a good winner. I was never much of a fan of Brian though, I wanted Helen to win.

[carlcon]

Originally posted by Dezzy

Kate! I forgot about her, She was a good winner. I was never much of a fan of Brian though, I wanted Helen to win.

This is why I slowly lost interest in the show.

BB 2 and 3 had amazing HMs. Then the show went from what it was originally (a psychological experiment about REAL people) to a freak-show.

This year brought it back to basics for me. Sure, we had an albino, a blind man the the terribly stereotypical bitchy over-the-top gay guy, but no real "freaks". I'm thinking along the lines of marco, mary (the irish witch - oh dear) and nadia.

Since psychology is my area of work, I'm completely biased towards "interesting developments" over "oh he's the hottest... he's the gayest... he's the loudest...etc".

They brought back the intereting, culturally different, mixed-class variety of housemate this year... and I salute them for it.

[Tom4784]

Originally posted by carlcon

This is why I slowly lost interest in the show.

BB 2 and 3 had amazing HMs. Then the show went from what it was originally (a psychological experiment about REAL people) to a freak-show.

This year brought it back to basics for me. Sure, we had an albino, a blind man the the terribly stereotypical bitchy over-the-top gay guy, but no real "freaks". I'm thinking along the lines of marco, mary (the irish witch - oh dear) and nadia.

Since psychology is my area of work, I'm completely biased towards "interesting developments" over "oh he's the hottest... he's the gayest... he's the loudest...etc".

They brought back the intereting, culturally different, mixed-class variety of housemate this year... and I salute them for it.

I think it's like baking, in order to make the best food you need a delicate mix. having a few 'freaky' HM's is good but like you said you do need normal people to balance it out. BB7 was one of my favourite series but I did think it had too many 'freaky' characters in it.

But then again you can't have too many normal characters wither or you'll end up with BB4. It'll be interesting to see what mix of HM's they go for next year.

[Shaun]

No. More deserving than Cameron, Anthony and Pete though.

[carlcon]

Identical twins.... two couples.... what comes next?

Personally, I'd like to see a wider mix of nationalities. Get a couple of Irish in there for starters. Perhaps another ozzy and american. Less of the good lookers, more of the interesting.

I understand that someone like dale attracts the young girls, but I didn't find anything interesting about him at all. As soon as Stu entered the house, Dale became obsolete. Stu had better physical qualities, then added some depth too. If that can happen to you, you have no place in the BB house, imo.

[Tom4784]

I agree, get some Irish people in there they haven't had good repesentation in the last few years (Spiral is the only HM I can think of). I do agree with the point about Dale and Stuart, Together I thought they was great but seperately they were kind of boring.

[carlcon]

Originally posted by Dezzy
I agree, get some Irish people in there they haven't had good repesentation in the last few years (Spiral is the only HM I can think of). I do agree with the point about Dale and Stuart, Together I thought they was great but seperately they were kind of boring.

I used to live very close to Spiral. He's such an embarassment. Before him was Mary (the witch) - wtf was that about? Then you had the good ones like Ray and Anna (I think both came 2nd?), and of course Brian, who won BB3... or was it 2?

[alex123]

how is she more deserving than any of them

they all were far more entertaining than her plus they were all nice people

rachael only won in the end because of use balloons on the forums voting in block numbers for her,mikey should of won

rachaels interview/best bits were boring there was nothing to talk to her about,really **** housemate she was

[alex123]

i loved anna (bb1) and brian (bb2)

i also loved orlaith although shes from northern ireland like me so technically british

seany was great to

spiral was an idiot

[rayheartbliss]

yerp..thats true!

although nadia and pete deserved it too...but rachel is the most deserving winner ever!

i mean people loved pete even though he completly didnt do much,but cover himself with hes duvet, and waxed hes pubes...

[alex123]

the only person that deserved the crown as much as anthony in bb6 was orlaith for the **** she was put through in that house and all the lies that was made about her

anthony was a good winner for bb6

eugine was boring.shouldnt of made it past the secret garden

makosi was a **** stirring,lieing bitch and that doesnt deserve to be rewarded no matter how entertaining she was

kinga was annoying,fake,only just arrived

derek was a horrible,nasty vile lying bully and like makosi that doesnt deserve a reward

kemal-well were do i start,liar,2 faced,nasty,wierd,****ed up wannabe,fake,girly bully,was the fakest housemate by miles.

science-good housemate,but was horribly annoying,all he done was argue,if he didnt argue,he was nothing special

craig-i wont even bother talking about this stalker.

no1 else is worth mentioning

anthony and orlaith were the only genuine,real decent people in the house that year and the public knew that,and orlaith walked so i wanted anthony to win and i think he really deserved it that year,why who do use think deserved it over him then,dont even bother saying eugine,as he was probably the most boring housemate that year,god knows why he was liked

how come use people like rachael

yet if i remember correctly use hated anthony and orlaith :S

whats the differance?except they actually had opinions

[Benjamin]

Originally posted by carlcon
Identical twins.... two couples.... what comes next?

Personally, I'd like to see a wider mix of nationalities. Get a couple of Irish in there for starters. Perhaps another ozzy and american. Less of the good lookers, more of the interesting.

I understand that someone like dale attracts the young girls, but I didn't find anything interesting about him at all. As soon as Stu entered the house, Dale became obsolete. Stu had better physical qualities, then added some depth too. If that can happen to you, you have no place in the BB house, imo.

I wish they would put a hot guy in, but one that does not realise he is hot, and is funny, smart and nice. I want BB10 to be the year of breaking stereotypes. like the one I mentioned and maybe a gay man that is one of the starightest acying/looking men around, a geeky girl who is popular, a chav who is actually kind hearted and polite, etc.

[alex123]

rachael and cameron are equally the most boring,undeserving winners of there respective series

ray should have won bb4
mikey should have won bb6

then we would have 9 good winners

if a female was to win this year it should have been sara or lisa had she not been evicted