| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics. |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#676 | |||
|
||||
|
Flag shagger.
|
I note it's mostly men who support trans women. Thank goodness for the men who stand by us.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#677 | ||
|
|||
|
thesheriff443
|
The trans community also includes females that transition to males
I have another good friend who has a daughter that is trans female to male Thankfully not all men and women think the same |
||
|
|
|
|
#678 | |||
|
||||
|
Crimson Dynamo | The voice of reason
|
wtaf
![]() For the first time, 3 men in a polyamorous relationship have been allowed to adopt. The throuple picked a 3-year-old girl from Quebec's child protection services, marking the province's first such case for an all-male throuple. The adoption was finalized “following a rigorous home study and court approval,” with two men listed as legal parents and the third pursuing full recognition under Quebec's updated family laws from a 2021 ruling https://x.com/visegrad24/status/1971739308177473637 |
|||
|
|
|
|
#679 | ||
|
|||
|
thesheriff443
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#680 | |||
|
||||
|
Benjamin | I Love Niamh’s Brick
|
Also is it actually true? The post on X has no actual proof/link. Not saying it’s not, but they could at least provide a link to the source.
__________________
It's never too late to be who you once could have been... Spoiler: Last edited by The Human Santapede; 27-09-2025 at 11:49 AM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#681 | |||
|
||||
|
Crimson Dynamo | The voice of reason
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#682 | |||
|
||||
|
Cherie | This Witch doesn't burn
|
Quote:
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#683 | |||
|
||||
|
Cherie | This Witch doesn't burn
|
and you hear nada about transmen...why is that
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#684 | |||
|
||||
|
Crimson Dynamo | The voice of reason
|
When a panelist asked if biological sex was real on Question Time you would think a
plague a locusts had entered the studio from Fiona Bruce’s reaction.. “Oh my goodness. It’s a question and it’s a MASSIVE question… it should be discussed at length and not in a soundbite.” video here - https://x.com/JohnJamesNI/status/1971659567395442777 JK Rowling @jk Rowling It’s such a massive question that it can be answered with a single word: ‘yes.’ What’s truly massive is the chicanery of members of the commentator class who’re too scared of ideologues both inside and outside their workplace to permit that single word to be uttered. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#685 | ||
|
|||
|
thesheriff443
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
#686 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
The only time you will find outrage about cis men are when they are non-white, left ring or gay. Everything else, the usual forum members literally pretend doesn't happen. It's grim. |
||
|
|
|
|
#687 | |||
|
||||
|
Cherie | This Witch doesn't burn
|
Quote:
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#688 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
People should be able to identify as being of a different gender to the one they had recorded at birth Men: 42% Women: 55% Transgender women should not be allowed to take part in women's sporting events Men: 77% Women: 72% Transgender women should not be allowed to use women's changing rooms? Men: 61% Women: 55% Transgender women should not be allowed to use women's toilets? Men: 57% Women: 53% Transgender women should not be allowed to use women's refuges for victims of rape or assault Men: 54% Women: 49% Do you believe that allowing transgender women to use spaces reserved for women, such as women's toilets or changing rooms presents a genuine risk of harm to women? Men: 57% Women: 53% It also shows acceptance for trans people significantly increases from those who have friends or family who is trans compared to someone who doesn't know anyone who is trans, which is unsurprising but logical - people who know trans people will have taken the time to understand trans people behind the fear-mongering headlines and see beyond the warped rhetoric they are the biggest threat to women this country faces. Source: https://ygo-assets-websites-editoria...study_2024.pdf |
||
|
|
|
|
#689 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Every time I bring up the vile behaviour from those cis white straight men on the right, it goes completely ignored by the four who shout the loudest about women's safety. Every single time. Which is crazy because they are obviously the bigger threat to women yet we keep on just putting the focus on minorities because this place is an echo chamber of bigotry. Have you ever questioned why the loudest member of the forum, when it comes to highlighting the vile acts of trans people, gay people and people of colour is a straight white men who supports... women's safety advocate erm...*checks notes* Donald Trump. Last edited by BBXX; 27-09-2025 at 04:57 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
#690 | |||
|
||||
|
Cherie | This Witch doesn't burn
|
Quote:
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#691 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
The articles aren't posted with good intention to shine a spotlight on the crimes of men and how it's awful for both women and trans women, they are posted with the intention to say "this is why the 'trans movement' is problematic'. The messaging is just a way to **** on trans people rather than to call out yet another issue straight cis men have created. Last edited by BBXX; 27-09-2025 at 05:09 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
#692 | |||
|
||||
|
Crimson Dynamo | The voice of reason
|
![]() Bill is a LA Liberal but he is sick of this BS 🚨NEW: Bill Maher BRUTALLY breaks down why Conservatives *CAN'T* align themselves with Left🚨 "They see gender as only a construct and sex as assigned at birth. And they say, 'We're not doing that!' Transing kids by self-diagnosis with no age limit, no parental notification and no acknowledgement of social contagion? Not doing it!" "Asylum now covers any reason for anyone to come to America — not doing it! Homelessness is a lifestyle. Natural immunity doesn't count anymore. Whiteness is toxic. Penises in women's prisons. Welcoming the intifada. We're not doing it!" "Smug self-righteousness in the defense of some of the dumbest ideas to ever come down the pike is not a formula that's really working for you." video here - https://x.com/JasonJournoDC/status/1971911223953285547 |
|||
|
|
|
|
#693 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
Last week late night talk show hosts were liberals with lefty guests and that was used to undermine them and today we’re using them as a mouthpiece to further an opinion. Lol.
|
||
|
|
|
|
#694 | |||
|
||||
|
Crimson Dynamo | The voice of reason
|
Quote:
I find that valuable |
|||
|
|
|
|
#695 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
I’m economically right-wing and socially left-wing - that’s not a combination I have come to by listening to an echo chamber. Last edited by BBXX; 27-09-2025 at 06:08 PM. |
||
|
|
|
|
#696 | |||
|
||||
|
Crimson Dynamo | The voice of reason
|
Quote:
Go out and broaden your mind and use google |
|||
|
|
|
|
#697 | |||
|
||||
|
Cherie | This Witch doesn't burn
|
Quote:
__________________
'put a bit of lippy on and run a brush through your hair, we are alcoholics, not savages' Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#698 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Away from the trans issue for example, women already talk about violence and sexism against women as an issue and society, right so, implores men to do the same. Someone who wants to harm women and who is a sexist pig isn't going to listen to women speaking about issues affecting them - much less trans women - but they are (unfortunately, really) more likely to listen to their fellow men and so for me, the change comes from within the demographic of those committing the act to talk out against it, rather than the victims of the act. I appreciate on wider topics, where there is no clear defined group of people who are culpable - such as homophobia, which can come from anyone - it's important for the group affected to speak out and raise awareness - but when the issue is coming from one demographic - straight men in this case - it's up to people within that community to call out any behaviour their friends or colleagues etc... may exhibit that makes them a danger towards women. Having said all that, cis men co-opting trans women's identities to attack other women is rare. That's not to downplay it, because any attack is horrendous, but because there is so much conversation about it, it's worth reminding people it shouldn't be the focus because otherwise we are at risk of forgetting the actual bigger risks. That's why discussing this topic on here feels disingenuous. There is so much conversation about the safety of women and girls and yet conversation around the main culprits is so often ignored (not specifically from you) or misdirected. I outlined exactly who women are at risk from and none of the loudest proponents of women's safety acknowledged the statistics, nobody say a thing about the men on the march telling women to get their tits out, nobody said anything about a woman being more likely to be murdered by her son than a stranger, nobody said anything about a large proportion of the men campaigning against migrants in the name of safety of women and girls being known to police for domestic violence accusations, nobody acknowledged the sexism and violence against women that runs through people who identify politically as right-wing and nobody who supports Tommy Robinson for example acknowledged his past indiscretions when it comes to women in a thread supporting his march and those on it. Instead the posts were ignored and the conversation was shifted to calling for Ant Middleton - a man who has a conviction for assaulting a female police officer - to become Mayor, grooming gangs, or more bizarrely was shifted to talking about the domestic violence rates within gay relationships. I know those didn't come from you and I am not asking you to defend or critique those members or take accountability for them, I'm just using it as a live example of how it's impossible to have an honest conversation about the safety of women when the main risk towards women is constantly ignored by the demographic who are the main cause of it. I fail to believe anyone who supports the likes of your Tommy Robinson's, Nigel Farage's, Charlie Kirks or Donald Trumps, who turns around and whose only conversation about the safety of women and girls is when it's related to 'trans' people or minorities is being honest about their care for the topic at hand. They are using it - using the subject of women being assaulted - as examples to affirm why their negative viewpoints about minorities are correct. How anyone can align themselves with these members and believe they have a shared interest is women is baffling to me. That isn't me blaming you for their viewpoints, but it is me highlighting the reason I find it strange you (and Livia) are always happy to call me out on the subject while standing in support of them. I believe you and I (and Livia) have far more in common when it comes to actually caring about women than perhaps you would think. |
||
|
|
|
|
#699 | |||
|
||||
|
Mystic Mock
|
Quote:
But like everything that Starmer does he has created a problem within this particular law, and it is fair to question if it's right to have Transwomen (who don't have a penis anymore) being in bathrooms and changing rooms with men. Obviously there were problems with perverts pretending to be Transgender to access women's bathrooms before, I do understand that. My point is that Starmer/Labour need to find a solution that endangers nobody towards being in a vulnerable situation with a sex pest. These are the types of situations that Starmer needs to show why he should be the leader of the Labour Party, and why it was right for the public to have elected him against Sunak.
__________________
![]() Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink and River Song as my Strictly 2025 Sweepstakes, and eventual winner and runner-up of the series.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#700 | |||
|
||||
|
Mystic Mock
|
Quote:
And that's why we have politicians to help come up with the solutions for us.
__________________
![]() Jimmy Floyd Hasselbaink and River Song as my Strictly 2025 Sweepstakes, and eventual winner and runner-up of the series.
|
|||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|