[Visage]

Originally Posted by Speedster

Oh really?.....the phrase "lol" comes to mind, in that case. I despise him for very good reasons actually-he's leading Josie, he's rude, agressive and sometimes he's violent. Also, he's a hypocrite who's full of his own self importance.


I think it's tragic that in the 21st century, women are still hooked on cavemen.

I didn't ask you for the reasons why you despise John James. I said that it was going to be difficult understanding your comments about him when you despise him so much.

[Zippy]

Originally Posted by Speedster

Oh really?.....the phrase "lol" comes to mind, in that case. I despise him for very good reasons actually-he's leading Josie, he's rude, agressive and sometimes he's violent. Also, he's a hypocrite who's full of his own self importance.


I think it's tragic that in the 21st century, women are still hooked on cavemen.

Agreed. Although I'd leave out the violence part. I think he's too much of a wimp to be physically violent. Strictly all huff and puff.

Or huff and ****, I should say.

[Visage]

Originally Posted by LiquidGold

he's a ******ing dickhead i coudnt beleive his ugly nerve when he stood up and took over everything declaring who goes in what a sh*t faced! sly ******er!!! all about who will he get on best with ie ones that boost his ego like you said ! and cause he wants more girls in there

Someone had to stand up, that's what Big Brother requested.


So why not John James?

You can't use the fact you think he's a dick head to cloud your judgement, or is that what you did in this case ?

Originally Posted by LiquidGold

what a sh*t faced! sly ******er!!! all about who will he get on best with ie ones that boost his ego

So what you are saying here is, John was the only housemates wanting certain people in because it would boost his ego?

Tell me then, why did the rest of the housemates shout who they wanted in there ?

You're so biased that whatever John James does, you see it different from any other housemates actions..........

[fuzzylovin]

Who cares, least we got some new peeps in.

[stoney]

but it was the majority decision to pick 1 and 2 .

the other pick should have been 4 as that is what the majority wanted but they decided they needed to have another female and put the deadwood that was 5 in in place

[Visage]

Originally Posted by stoney

but it was the majority decision to pick 1 and 2 .

the other pick should have been 4 as that is what the majority wanted but they decided they needed to have another female and put the deadwood that was 5 in in place

In all fairness though, they had 1 minute to chose which three, that alone is going to cause a panic vote. Everyone shouting who they wanted in and trying to figure out the majority votes is a very difficult task.

BB did it this way because it's more than likely going to cause arguments.

Hell it certainly stirred this site up last night!

[stoney]

yep its just a shame that they were only going to pick 1 guy cos number 4 looked like he would have been a great inmate but 2 seemed popular to them all altho I missed why.

6 was not liked, Davina mentioned on BBBM that he wasn't liked in auditions so a few of the inmates had said no way as soon as they saw him.

[Visage]

Originally Posted by stoney

yep its just a shame that they were only going to pick 1 guy cos number 4 looked like he would have been a great inmate but 2 seemed popular to them all altho I missed why.

6 was not liked, Davina mentioned on BBBM that he wasn't liked in auditions so a few of the inmates had said no way as soon as they saw him.

I would have liked to have seen number four go in, I wondered if they tried to balance the boy/girl majority in there reasoning, although like what's been said, it was all over in minute & I don't think any of the housemates gave it much thought.