[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by Locke.

Arista bumps his thread near enough daily when the TV show he is talking about is on. He has a perfectly good reason for doing it, which is that the TV show is on.. He does it in other threads about TV shows but people actually care about them and talk about the shows in the threads so you don't really notice it. All he is doing is reminind people that it is on.

Posting in threads that haven't had a reply for years is completely different.

ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU DO IT IN MULTIPLE THREADS ALL THE TIME MICHAEL21 AND THEBEAST

Which is my very point. People who like Emma will be aware when the TV show is on. Yet it's still allowed - despite it only being the one person posting over and over again.

Seems a bit like double standards, that's all I'm saying: simply putting my opinion over.

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by michael21

because channel 5 are showing a movie on the 17th that why channel5 move bb to the 18th i was saying i bet channel 4 put on the MPD when bb on what wrong with its better then saying on now right

Yeah but this hasnt really got anything to do with the original thread.

Im surprised you didnt put that little piece of info in your freeview thread actually

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

Which is my very point. People who like Emma will be aware when the TV show is on. Yet it's still allowed - despite it only being the one person posting over and over again.

Seems a bit like double standards, that's all I'm saying: simply putting my opinion over.

No, there's a select couple of members that may bump the soaps threads to discuss them when they're on TV. Arista bumps the thread when Emma is on channel 5 news. It's not his fault he's the only one to watch channel 5.

As much as I find it pointless and irritating it's not the same as bumping the Sophie Reade marathon thread.

[michael21]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Yeah but this hasnt really got anything to do with the original thread.

Im surprised you didnt put that little piece of info in your freeview thread actually

what have there put in you tea today (that tread does have a lot of good info you no you love it )

[michael21]

Originally Posted by 08marsh

No, there's a select couple of members that may bump the soaps threads to discuss them when they're on TV. Arista bumps the thread when Emma is on channel 5 news. It's not his fault he's the only one to watch channel 5.

As much as I find it pointless and irritating it's not the same as bumping the Sophie Reade marathon thread.

but i only did it one time he does it every day almost

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

But again, I have NEVER seen this happen. Until you give an example of this(which shouldnt be hard as it happens all the time) I cant really comment. :/

http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/foru...d.php?t=136023

http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/foru...d.php?t=140500

http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/foru...d.php?t=135543

One which a member is getting gried: the 2 other in which members have not a word said to them. This is what I find confusing.

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by 08marsh

No, there's a select couple of members that may bump the soaps threads to discuss them when they're on TV. Arista bumps the thread when Emma is on channel 5 news. It's not his fault he's the only one to watch channel 5.

As much as I find it pointless and irritating it's not the same as bumping the Sophie Reade marathon thread.

.

[Zippy]

Originally Posted by michael21

what about this thread http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/foru...d.php?t=171233

arista bumping just to keep saying she's on TV!

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by 08marsh

No, there's a select couple of members that may bump the soaps threads to discuss them when they're on TV. Arista bumps the thread when Emma is on channel 5 news. It's not his fault he's the only one to watch channel 5.

As much as I find it pointless and irritating it's not the same as bumping the Sophie Reade marathon thread.

No hope for this year's BB then.

Again, this is my point. If she's on the news: there is no need for such a thread to be bumped.

All I am saying is that it is a rule that I find can be bent to suit: I'm not quite getting any feeling of consistency (and not necessarily from the mods I have to say, it's not all about them, that I want to make clear) - it seems (seems) that some can't do right for doing wrong.

[Zippy]

Moan moan moan

the only consistent thing at TiBB is the inconsistency. You should really know that by now.

[michael21]

bump

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/foru...d.php?t=136023

http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/foru...d.php?t=140500

http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/foru...d.php?t=135543

One which a member is getting gried: the 2 other in which members have not a word said to them. This is what I find confusing.

The first thread was bumped with 'i bet channel 4 bring back the MPD and put it on the same time as Big Brother ' which has nothing to do really with the OP. Also came after the member in question bumped a LOT of old threads (sorry michael, you know I love you really )

Second was bumped with just a smiley...surely you see the problem there.

Third was bumped with 'i want Sophie Reade in celebrity big brother 2011'. This has nothing to do with the marathon at all.

All three were bumped by the same user(the OP...of the bumped threads), but they deleted their bumps after the other members commented, making it look like other people had bumped them.

[michael21]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

The first thread was bumped with 'i bet channel 4 bring back the MPD and put it on the same time as Big Brother ' which has nothing to do really with the OP. Also came after the member in question bumped a LOT of old threads (sorry michael, you know I love you really )

Second was bumped with just a smiley...surely you see the problem there.

Third was bumped with 'i want Sophie Reade in celebrity big brother 2011'. This has nothing to do with the marathon at all.

All three were bumped by the same user(the OP), but they deleted their bumps after the other members commented, making it look like other people had bumped them.

Vicky love me o yea and

[Zippy]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

All three were bumped by the same user(the OP), but they deleted their bumps after the other members commented, making it look like other people had bumped them.

crafty bitch

[michael21]

i would bump Jordan threads but there all about cher lloyd

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by michael21

i would bump Jordan threads but there all about cher lloyd

Prove it

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

No hope for this year's BB then.

Again, this is my point. If she's on the news: there is no need for such a thread to be bumped.

All I am saying is that it is a rule that I find can be bent to suit: I'm not quite getting any feeling of consistency (and not necessarily from the mods I have to say, it's not all about them, that I want to make clear) - it seems (seems) that some can't do right for doing wrong.

Well the majority of this board have said BB is the only thing that is getting them switching to the channel. Other than that there's nothing.

[michael21]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

Prove it

your post just did that

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by michael21

your post just did that

A post is not a thread

[michael21]

Originally Posted by 08marsh

Well the majority of this board have said BB is the only thing that is getting them switching to the channel. Other than that there's nothing.

what about fit emma

[michael21]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

A post is not a thread

a post is a start of a thread

[Pyramid*]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

The first thread was bumped with 'i bet channel 4 bring back the MPD and put it on the same time as Big Brother ' which has nothing to do really with the OP. Also came after the member in question bumped a LOT of old threads (sorry michael, you know I love you really )

Second was bumped with just a smiley...surely you see the problem there.

Third was bumped with 'i want Sophie Reade in celebrity big brother 2011'. This has nothing to do with the marathon at all.

All three were bumped by the same user(the OP...of the bumped threads), but they deleted their bumps after the other members commented, making it look like other people had bumped them.

That's my point. The bump still generated interest - certainly one of them did - yet that seems okay - but not the others (which would have died away given the lack of interest anyway). Don't you see what I mean?

anyway: I still don't feel it's clear. Some are allowed to do it, even though it's pointless comments, and some aren't - that's all I'm saying. It's hard to know where members stand sometimes when there is disparity.

[michael21]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

That's my point. The bump still generated interest - certainly one of them did - yet that seems okay - but not the others (which would have died away given the lack of interest anyway). Don't you see what I mean?

anyway: I still don't feel it's clear. Some are allowed to do it, even though it's pointless comments, and some aren't - that's all I'm saying. It's hard to know where members stand sometimes when there is disparity.

i agree 100%

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by Pyramid*

That's my point. The bump still generated interest - certainly one of them did - yet that seems okay - but not the others (which would have died away given the lack of interest anyway). Don't you see what I mean?

anyway: I still don't feel it's clear. Some are allowed to do it, even though it's pointless comments, and some aren't - that's all I'm saying. It's hard to know where members stand sometimes when there is disparity.

I feel you are deliberately missing my point.

'Some are allowed to do it'...when there is actually a point in the bumping. 'Some arent'' when there is no point at all in bumping them.

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by michael21

i agree 100%

Hmmm...so what on earth was the reason for bumping my thread from april?