[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by fruit_cake

hmm..I'm not convinces. I still get the impression that if Arron had done the same actions as Scott his supporters would have called it 'banter' or 'pranks' or 'fun'.

Just like Arrons critics are calling it great and a fun thing by Scott rather than out of order?.

However,I actually would have said that Arron was out of order to be so offensive to Scott had he been the only one that done it, as it was Scott had been going on about him a good while like that.

I guess Arrons critics will always blame him for everything and use it against him but anyone who does anything as offensive to him Like Scott did will get the benefit of the doubt.

All I know is, no matter what,had I been on the receiving end of Scott's drunken ramblings and insults like Arron was, I would not have just sat there and took it and I also dare bet Arrons critics wouldn't have either.

Arron approached Scott the next day,apologising for in any way maybe upsetting him, telling him he hopes he knew he could go and talk to him, even after that Scott still never apologised for any of it.
Well,if that behaviour makes Scott the better man then what a sad world this would be if everywhere that kind of drunken offensive behaviour was rewarded with praise and admiration.

[fruit_cake]

Originally Posted by rinkydinkpanther

nah scott wasnt trying to be funny or be humourous he was being plain nasty

many people on here found it hilarious tbf

[rinkydinkpanther]

Originally Posted by fruit_cake

many people on here found it hilarious tbf

some said they did, possibly because they liked scott and his allies anyways, maybe some actually did find it funny, I found it profoundly unfunny. then again I found john mccririck hilarious so humour is very subjective