[Kizzy]

While they are at it the main search engines can link anyone trying to access child porn straight through to the appropriate authorities too...

[arista]

its for young kids
to keep them Blocked from graphic porn


Makes Sense

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by arista

its for young kids
to keep them Blocked from graphic porn


Makes Sense

Young kids shouldnt be on the internet unsupervised anyway IMO

[arista]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Young kids shouldnt be on the internet unsupervised anyway IMO

Yes Vicky
some are not

but many are

[Lee.]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Young kids shouldnt be on the internet unsupervised anyway IMO

But you can't supervise them all the time.. I keep the laptop in the living room and they're not allowed to take it to their room... But they all have iPods, smart phones, tablets etc.. Plus you don't know what they're doing when they're at other people's houses.

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by Lee.

But you can't supervise them all the time.. I keep the laptop in the living room and they're not allowed to take it to their room... But they all have iPods, smart phones, tablets etc.. Plus you don't know what they're doing when they're at other people's houses.

But you can set up filters yourself already?

As for other peoples houses, you still won't know really. As they might have opted in.

Whatever next? Ban the use of eyes, just in case they happen to see something that might be harmful?

To find porn, you need to search for it. Why not ban fighting videos on the net? How about traffic accidents?

People should be allowed to view what they want. If it's not illegal to watch Anjelica or Stoya being ploughed, then get the ****** out of my living room/bedroom/toilet/kitchen/shed/sex dungeon.

The women involved aren't sex slaves.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Jesus.

Whatever next? Ban the use of eyes, just in case they happen to see something that might be harmful?

To find porn, you need to search for it. Why not ban fighting videos on the net? How about traffic accidents?

People should be allowed to view what they want. If it's not illegal to watch Anjelica or Stoya being ploughed, then get the ****** out of my living room/bedroom/toilet/kitchen/shed/sex dungeon.

The women involved aren't sex slaves.

Bans fags in open places

[LikeABoatOnWater]

Originally Posted by arista

Bans fags in open places

this is one thing they need to do. pronto

[Lee.]

Originally Posted by Jesus.

Whatever next? Ban the use of eyes, just in case they happen to see something that might be harmful?

To find porn, you need to search for it. Why not ban fighting videos on the net? How about traffic accidents?

People should be allowed to view what they want. If it's not illegal to watch Anjelica or Stoya being ploughed, then get the ****** out of my living room/bedroom/toilet/kitchen/shed/sex dungeon.

The women involved aren't sex slaves.

You don't have to actually search for it though.. There's a lot of innocent searches will return some dubious results.

Originally Posted by Lee.

You don't have to actually search for it though.. There's a lot of innocent searches will return some dubious results.

Stick to web search and stay off the image search, you dirty mare.

[arista]

Originally Posted by Jesus.

Stick to web search and stay off the image search, you dirty mare.

No let her get Rock Hard


Feel The Force

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Jesus.

Whatever next? Ban the use of eyes, just in case they happen to see something that might be harmful?

To find porn, you need to search for it. Why not ban fighting videos on the net? How about traffic accidents?

People should be allowed to view what they want. If it's not illegal to watch Anjelica or Stoya being ploughed, then get the ****** out of my living room/bedroom/toilet/kitchen/shed/sex dungeon.

The women involved aren't sex slaves.

How do you know this?

Originally Posted by Kizzy

How do you know this?

Because it's a regulated industry. I don't watch porn from Turkmenistan filmed on a dodgy handheld in the back of a 1974 van.

I'm not saying that there isn't anyone one in the porn industry who is a sex slave, but it seems a bit of a stretch to assume that most people are, and banning porn from computers in the UK, will have a positive impact on human trafficking around the world. It won't.

There are probably people working in fruit farms/restaurants in the UK that have been trafficked. It happens everywhere and in every industry, but porn is actually fairly decent for looking after the people involved these days.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Jesus.

Because it's a regulated industry. I don't watch porn from Turkmenistan filmed on a dodgy handheld in the back of a 1974 van.

I'm not saying that there isn't anyone one in the porn industry who is a sex slave, but it seems a bit of a stretch to assume that most people are, and banning porn from computers in the UK, will have a positive impact on human trafficking around the world. It won't.

There are probably people working in fruit farms/restaurants in the UK that have been trafficked. It happens everywhere and in every industry, but porn is actually fairly decent for looking after the people involved these days.

I appreciate there may be, that said if you google the same word can you be guaranteed not to access an unregulated film?
I was told of a girl yesterday admitted by social services at 14 to a local hospital with iron burns all over her body, trafficked for the sex trade.

Maybe the feeling is reduce the supply reduce the demand I don't know, it may be that it is for child protection services to flag up pedophilia and other sex crimes?
I find it hard to believe this is merely a moral issue.

[arista]

on directv.to
they do not know you are watching Legal porn
it just gives them the USA link site

[Nedusa]

GOOD......about bloody time, if you want to receive Pornagraphic material then you should be able to but have to go through some sort of vetting/opting in procedure. It should never be available at the click of button to absolutely anybody.

I think one of the reasons young children today are so confused re sexual matters is that they view thousands of pornagraphic images and engage in under age sex with absolutely no understanding of the consequences or the responsibilites that come from sexual relationships.

Originally Posted by Nedusa

GOOD......about bloody time, if you want to receive Pornagraphic material then you should be able to but have to go through some sort of vetting/opting in procedure. It should never be available at the click of button to absolutely anybody.

I think one of the reasons young children today are so confused re sexual matters is that they view thousands of pornagraphic images and engage in under age sex with absolutely no understanding of the consequences or the responsibilites that come from sexual relationships.

What is the evidence that children today are confused about sexual matters?

Children engage in under age sex, regardless of what's on the internet. It's just a fact. It's weird the way people are acting that children only started to know about sex when the internet was introduced into society.

Internet porn has probably provided confused children/teens with more reassurance, and less stigma.

[Nedusa]

Originally Posted by Jesus.

What is the evidence that children today are confused about sexual matters?

Children engage in under age sex, regardless of what's on the internet. It's just a fact. It's weird the way people are acting that children only started to know about sex when the internet was introduced into society.

Internet porn has probably provided confused children/teens with more reassurance, and less stigma.

This....!!!!

"Why should my children have access to millions of pages of hardcore, sometimes violent pornography just so you can toss yourself off?"

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Jesus.

What is the evidence that children today are confused about sexual matters?

Children engage in under age sex, regardless of what's on the internet. It's just a fact. It's weird the way people are acting that children only started to know about sex when the internet was introduced into society.

Internet porn has probably provided confused children/teens with more reassurance, and less stigma.

I think you know that's not true, there have been many studies done some of which maybe helped in this decision?

Originally Posted by Kizzy

I think you know that's not true, there have been many studies done some of which maybe helped in this decision?

I wouldn't have written it if I knew it wasn't true. Provide the studies. I'm not entirely sure what "there have been many studies done some of which maybe helped in this decision?" means.

[Kizzy]

Originally Posted by Jesus.

I wouldn't have written it if I knew it wasn't true. Provide the studies. I'm not entirely sure what "there have been many studies done some of which maybe helped in this decision?" means.

I am not going to spend time collating information for you, there have been studies into the effects of young people exposed to online porn, and my point was those may have been what prompted the government in their decision to restrict access to online porn.

[Lee.]

Originally Posted by Jesus.

What is the evidence that children today are confused about sexual matters?

Children engage in under age sex, regardless of what's on the internet. It's just a fact. It's weird the way people are acting that children only started to know about sex when the internet was introduced into society.

Internet porn has probably provided confused children/teens with more reassurance, and less stigma.

Teens maybe.. But my kids are only 6 and 9. I don't want them to be able to view cocks n stuff

Originally Posted by Lee.

Teens maybe.. But my kids are only 6 and 9. I don't want them to be able to view cocks n stuff

I have sympathy with you here, but you can contact your ISP and ask them to make your internet child friendly. I know you are a responsible parent, as are most people in general, and all concerned parents currently have the ability to do something about it. It's not like there is no other way for us all to avoid porn.

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by Lee.

Teens maybe.. But my kids are only 6 and 9. I don't want them to be able to view cocks n stuff

Do you not think an opt in system would be better than this? (I think there is aready an opt in system in place actually)

I dont watch porn, but if I did I would feel quite embarrassed having to declare to the world that I did in order to watch it. Whereas I wouldn't feel embarrassed asking for a block put on to protect my kids from accidentally finding it.

I doubt the filter will even work properly anyway. Even with safesearch and such on, you still come across the odd dodgy site.