[daniel-lewis-1985]

She literally just described the state of Big Brother down to a T.

The way she said people should be allowed to express themselves and be evicted by the process was spot on.

This woman responded to an advert in the paper 15 years ago to appear in a social experiment which turned out to be the pilot of BB and she is right in saying BB is totally flawed and again she is 100% spot on when saying people shouldn't be censoring themselves.

Shes just worded what ive been feeling for years.

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by daniel-lewis-1985

She literally just described the state of Big Brother down to a T.

The way she said people should be allowed to express themselves and be evicted by the process was spot on.

This woman responded to an advert in the paper 15 years ago to appear in a social experiment which turned out to be the pilot of BB and she is right in saying BB is totally flawed and again she is 100% spot on when saying people shouldn't be censoring themselves.

Shes just worded what ive been feeling for years.

She was spot on.

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

She was spot on.

It really pains me to say this as to Katie but I totally agree with you and Daniel, she was spot on.

[Cal.]

You chanelling KT x

[MB.]

I'm sure Nick being ejected in the first series was all part of the 'social experiment' too.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by MB.

I'm sure Nick being ejected in the first series was all part of the 'social experiment' too.

[daniel-lewis-1985]

Originally Posted by MB.

I'm sure Nick being ejected in the first series was all part of the 'social experiment' too.

A social experiment has no plans.

The Nick situation was something that happened naturally and had 8 million people watching live online.

Sit down.

[MB.]

Originally Posted by daniel-lewis-1985

A social experiment has no plans.

The Nick situation was something that happened naturally and had 8 million people watching live online.

Sit down.

In which case, Ken breaking the rules multiple times also happened naturally. Not sure what your point is.

[the truth]

Originally Posted by MB.

In which case, Ken breaking the rules multiple times also happened naturally. Not sure what your point is.

it was allowed to reach that stage as he was abused group bullied even bitten without the BB producers doing a damn thing about it

[armand.kay]

Originally Posted by MB.

In which case, Ken breaking the rules multiple times also happened naturally. Not sure what your point is.

ken and Nick's situations aren't really the same tho are they.
The original social experiment was to see how people behave when cutoff from the outside world and forced to nominate people for eviction every week, with one being voted off by the public. Now Katie's point was that it's a failed social experiment because the views you're allowed to express are limited meaning you can't really see people true behaviour. This is a problem when the point of the experiment is to measure housemates behaviour.

Now in nick's case he was kicked out for breaking rules to do with the nomination and eviction system which is one of the things that big brother has manipulated in order to see how peoples behaviour changes because of it so rules stopping housemates from altering the system are necessary in order to stop them making the experiment pointless.

Also you have to remember that as well as an experiment it's a game show and nick's rule break cheated the game as it helped him advance further with an advantage non of the others had.

[daniel-lewis-1985]

Originally Posted by armand.kay

ken and Nick's situations aren't really the same tho are they.
The original social experiment was to see how people behave when cutoff from the outside world and forced to nominate people for eviction every week, with one being voted off by the public. Now Katie's point was that it's a failed social experiment because the views you're allowed to express are limited meaning you can't really see people true behaviour. This is a problem when the point of the experiment is to measure housemates behaviour.

Now in nick's case he was kicked out for breaking rules to do with the nomination and eviction system which is one of the things that big brother has manipulated in order to see how peoples behaviour changes because of it so rules stopping housemates from altering the system are necessary in order to stop them making the experiment pointless.

Also you have to remember that as well as an experiment it's a game show and nick's rule break cheated the game as it helped him advance further with an advantage non of the others had.

Well said

[Denver]

Originally Posted by MB.

I'm sure Nick being ejected in the first series was all part of the 'social experiment' too.

The show was still new and they didnt know what to do if they ejected someone for writing secret messages then they would be laughed at

[Pincho Paxton]

Well social experiments have to have limits, because we are all part of the experiment's effects on society.

[thinkingoutloud]

She was absolutely correct with this. Of course a line has to be drawn when people get offensive though and if there are a ridiculous amount of ofcom complaints etc and Ken had been previously warned about his language yet continued to use it (which I don't think Katie was actually aware of), but she is right in saying that people are too scared to say things because of the possible offences it could cause.

[the truth]

its been a biased endlessly manipulated piece of man hating trash for a decade

[Crimson Dynamo]

I wish they had asked ken about muslims

And immigration

Alas we shall never know

[MB.]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

I wish they had asked ken about muslims

And immigration

Alas we shall never know

Youtube video

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

I wish they had asked ken about muslims

And immigration

Alas we shall never know

Tbh being against any Religion does not make you a racist or prejudiced really, I personally find a lot of the extremists that join these Abrahamic Religions to be barbaric, and backward in the way that they approach certain situations.

And with Katie she seems the type to me that only wants PC took away just so she can be really offensive, I mean she would have it that you would walk down the street and get abused for the colour of your skin, your weight, your height, nationality, Religion, the colour of your hair, your regional accent, why would some people want to remove just because you don't want to be polite? You can still be mean to someone without having to go too personal.

[the truth]

Originally Posted by The Mockinator

Tbh being against any Religion does not make you a racist or prejudiced really, I personally find a lot of the extremists that join these Abrahamic Religions to be barbaric, and backward in the way that they approach certain situations.

And with Katie she seems the type to me that only wants PC took away just so she can be really offensive, I mean she would have it that you would walk down the street and get abused for the colour of your skin, your weight, your height, nationality, Religion, the colour of your hair, your regional accent, why would some people want to remove just because you don't want to be polite? You can still be mean to someone without having to go too personal.

she a pleasant person. but nadia is worse. nadia is dishonest and controlling. she is a wolf in sheeps clothing, a person who demands rights for her friends and women. but doesn't give a damn for those outside her circle. shes a false prophet in every sense of the word. thoroughly dishonest

[the truth]

the uk is a failed social ex[periement with endless biased laws which are corrupting every part of it

[Jarrod]

Wrong thread

[abhorson]

As much as Katie offends for a living, even she knows the boundaries. Did you all hear her saying to Ken the other night, when he was talking to Alexander. She went Shhhhhhh Ken.

[the truth]

Originally Posted by abhorson

As much as Katie offends for a living, even she knows the boundaries. Did you all hear her saying to Ken the other night, when he was talking to Alexander. She went Shhhhhhh Ken.

she doesn't offend for a living she gives her opinion...just because the PC twats in the UK pretend to get offended doesn't mean it is actually offensive

[abhorson]

Originally Posted by the truth

she doesn't offend for a living she gives her opinion...just because the PC twats in the UK pretend to get offended doesn't mean it is actually offensive

She gets paid for it Truth. Sun, This morning, channel 4 and 5.

[the truth]

Originally Posted by abhorson

She gets paid for it Truth. Sun, This morning, channel 4 and 5.

shes allowed to say all these things simply because shes a woman. a man wouldn't get away with saying any of it in this sexist man hating basket case of a country