[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by Robodog

1. Labels, labels, labels.
Labels are not arguments, they are insults.
It's also what racists do - label people, pigeon hole them, judge them then dismiss them:
"I no longer have to like you or listen to you because i've labelled you as a (whatever)"

Labels are used vindictively to stop the discussion. They are just another type of prejudice, and are used to shut people down.

2. How has Ann 'blocked' people??
She ALWAYS has discussion with people and listens to everything they say. If they still end up disagreeing with her, then she is FINE WITH THAT and bears no grudge to them, even when others clearly bear grudges against her!

No one dares to stand up to her?
Yes they do.
OK - so who has had problems with her? Andrew and Shane J.
Both had talks with her -so clearly they weren't scared.

Malika has moaned about Ann and Rachel and she hasn't spoken to them directly.
Does that mean she is scared, or is she just being two-faced?

Maybe they 'don't dare' confront Ann/Rachel, because they don't have a reasonable and well-considered argument - they just have cheap and insulting labels. And labels and insults won't last five minutes in an sensible discussion with someone intelligent like Ann or Rachel.

It's cowardly.

This is why Andrew waited until he was safely back in the house before calling Ann a "fqqqing witch", when only SECONDS BEFORE he told her he has "No hard feelings and he forgives her"

What a hypocrite.
What a coward.

And people think ANN is the problem!

Like her or loathe her - she would NEVER be so two-faced and nasty as people are with her.

You are very wise Robo, I see no lies

[Robodog]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

You are very wise Robo, I see no lies

Thanx 4 the praise

From yo same wise ways

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

You are very wise Robo, I see no lies

I hope you are not inferring other members tell lies on here.

Do we not all just give opinions as we see and feel them,or is anyone not agreeing with you possibly just lying.

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

I hope you are not inferring other members tell lies on here.

Do we not all just give opinions as we see and feel them,or is anyone not agreeing with you possibly just lying.

No one has said that at all , I meant his post was accurate imo,is that ok with you? or do I have to run everything past you? If I thought someone was a liar I would tell them , I have my opinion ,you have yours ,so let it be !!!

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Kazanne

No one has said that at all , I meant his post was accurate imo,is that ok with you? or do I have to run everything past you? If I thought someone was a liar I would tell them , I have my opinion ,you have yours ,so let it be !!!

No you don't, very thankfully for me.

[poppsywoppsy]

Originally Posted by Robodog

1.
Labels, labels, labels.
Labels are not arguments, they are insults.
It's also what racists do - label people, pigeon hole them, judge them then dismiss them:
"I no longer have to like you or listen to you because i've labelled you as a (whatever)"

Labels are used vindictively to stop the discussion. They are just another type of prejudice, and are used to shut people down.

2.
How has Ann 'blocked' people??
She ALWAYS has discussion with people and listens to everything they say. If they still end up disagreeing with her, then she is FINE WITH THAT and bears no grudge to them, even when others clearly bear grudges against her!

No one dares to stand up to her? Yes they do!
Who has had problems with her? Andrew and Shane J.
Both had talks with her -so clearly they weren't scared.

Malika has moaned about Ann and Rachel and true she hasn't spoken to them directly.
Does that mean she is scared, or is she just being two-faced?

Maybe they 'don't dare' confront Ann/Rachel, because they don't have a reasonable and well-considered argument - they just have cheap and insulting labels. And labels and insults won't last five minutes in an sensible discussion with someone intelligent like Ann or Rachel.

It's cowardly.

This is why Andrew waited until he was safely back in the house before calling Ann a "fqqqing witch", when only SECONDS BEFORE he told her he has "No hard feelings and he forgives her" !!

What a hypocrite.
What a coward.

And people think ANN is the problem!

Like her or loathe her - she would NEVER be so two-faced and nasty as people are with her.



.

I second that totally

Then you get those who for whatever reason will not care to look for these attributes and just casually jump on the anti Ann bandwagon because they can.

Have they thought it through?
Does her views affect them personally?
Will forcing her to change her views do anything for freedom of speech and thought?

Would they like to be forced to be and think against their will?

[Ellen]

Originally Posted by Robodog

1.
Labels, labels, labels.
Labels are not arguments, they are insults.
It's also what racists do - label people, pigeon hole them, judge them then dismiss them:
"I no longer have to like you or listen to you because i've labelled you as a (whatever)"

Labels are used vindictively to stop the discussion. They are just another type of prejudice, and are used to shut people down.

2.
How has Ann 'blocked' people??
She ALWAYS has discussion with people and listens to everything they say. If they still end up disagreeing with her, then she is FINE WITH THAT and bears no grudge to them, even when others clearly bear grudges against her!

No one dares to stand up to her? Yes they do!
Who has had problems with her? Andrew and Shane J.
Both had talks with her -so clearly they weren't scared.

Malika has moaned about Ann and Rachel and true she hasn't spoken to them directly.
Does that mean she is scared, or is she just being two-faced?

Maybe they 'don't dare' confront Ann/Rachel, because they don't have a reasonable and well-considered argument - they just have cheap and insulting labels. And labels and insults won't last five minutes in an sensible discussion with someone intelligent like Ann or Rachel.

It's cowardly.

This is why Andrew waited until he was safely back in the house before calling Ann a "fqqqing witch", when only SECONDS BEFORE he told her he has "No hard feelings and he forgives her" !!

What a hypocrite.
What a coward.

And people think ANN is the problem!

Like her or loathe her - she would NEVER be so two-faced and nasty as people are with her.



.

This is a great post, well said and i agree

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Robodog

1.
Labels, labels, labels.
Labels are not arguments, they are insults.
It's also what racists do - label people, pigeon hole them, judge them then dismiss them:
"I no longer have to like you or listen to you because i've labelled you as a (whatever)"

Labels are used vindictively to stop the discussion. They are just another type of prejudice, and are used to shut people down.

2.
How has Ann 'blocked' people??
She ALWAYS has discussion with people and listens to everything they say. If they still end up disagreeing with her, then she is FINE WITH THAT and bears no grudge to them, even when others clearly bear grudges against her!

No one dares to stand up to her? Yes they do!
Who has had problems with her? Andrew and Shane J.
Both had talks with her -so clearly they weren't scared.

Malika has moaned about Ann and Rachel and true she hasn't spoken to them directly.
Does that mean she is scared, or is she just being two-faced?

Maybe they 'don't dare' confront Ann/Rachel, because they don't have a reasonable and well-considered argument - they just have cheap and insulting labels. And labels and insults won't last five minutes in an sensible discussion with someone intelligent like Ann or Rachel.

It's cowardly.

This is why Andrew waited until he was safely back in the house before calling Ann a "fqqqing witch", when only SECONDS BEFORE he told her he has "No hard feelings and he forgives her" !!

What a hypocrite.
What a coward.

And people think ANN is the problem!

Like her or loathe her - she would NEVER be so two-faced and nasty as people are with her.



.

[chuff me dizzy]

Originally Posted by Robodog

1.
Labels, labels, labels.
Labels are not arguments, they are insults.
It's also what racists do - label people, pigeon hole them, judge them then dismiss them:
"I no longer have to like you or listen to you because i've labelled you as a (whatever)"

Labels are used vindictively to stop the discussion. They are just another type of prejudice, and are used to shut people down.

2.
How has Ann 'blocked' people??
She ALWAYS has discussion with people and listens to everything they say. If they still end up disagreeing with her, then she is FINE WITH THAT and bears no grudge to them, even when others clearly bear grudges against her!

No one dares to stand up to her? Yes they do!
Who has had problems with her? Andrew and Shane J.
Both had talks with her -so clearly they weren't scared.

Malika has moaned about Ann and Rachel and true she hasn't spoken to them directly.
Does that mean she is scared, or is she just being two-faced?

Maybe they 'don't dare' confront Ann/Rachel, because they don't have a reasonable and well-considered argument - they just have cheap and insulting labels. And labels and insults won't last five minutes in an sensible discussion with someone intelligent like Ann or Rachel.

It's cowardly.

This is why Andrew waited until he was safely back in the house before calling Ann a "fqqqing witch", when only SECONDS BEFORE he told her he has "No hard feelings and he forgives her" !!

What a hypocrite.
What a coward.

And people think ANN is the problem!

Like her or loathe her - she would NEVER be so two-faced and nasty as people are with her.



.

Excellent as always

[Crimson Dynamo]

robodog ending da hataz



skillz

[Robodog]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

robodog ending da hataz



skillz

...to pay da billz

[Nicky91]

Ann is so right in wanting that gossiping drag queen bitch out

[Robertocarlo]

Originally Posted by clairefromsomewhereinnort

And she said she s never happy to see Courtney. i think we all know why Widdicombe wants Shane J out. Cos Pure and Simple - SHE S A BIGOT. And she blocks other people showing their true selves cos no one dare stand up against her so why s she still in ?

Precisely.

[AnnieK]

Originally Posted by clairefromsomewhereinnort

And she said she s never happy to see Courtney. i think we all know why Widdicombe wants Shane J out. Cos Pure and Simple - SHE S A BIGOT. And she blocks other people showing their true selves cos no one dare stand up against her so why s she still in ?

Why does no one dare though? This is the bit I am struggling to understand. Why are grown adults afraid to confront her and deal with issues as they arise