[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

People will moan whatever. See they want normal nominations/a consistent format for nominations, but it this results in the wrong people being up...then they wants twists to ensure that the people that they want to be up are up. Basically. Producers can't win really.

Exactly.

It's like VTS/VTE, they only want it when one results in their fave being evicted, then when the opposite evicts a good housemate too they never learn.

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

People will moan whatever. See they want normal nominations/a consistent format for nominations, but it this results in the wrong people being up...then they wants twists to ensure that the people that they want to be up are up. Basically. Producers can't win really.

or what Vicky said.

[Jake.]

I don’t really think it’s them hitting the panic button though. It’s not as if this sort of reveal is going to spark an increase in viewing figures.

[Garfie]

I will wait and see how it plays out before I come to a judgement about the gamechanger.

[annabelindabee]

complicated .

[Vanessa]

It sounds interesting, i think. Can't wait.

[Marsh.]

It's clearly been planned from the start. They said the coins would change the game all series.

Paul Osbourne didn't bullsh*t unlike the producer of BB17.

[Marsh.]

So, you're using a fansite to try and "prove" the fansites are wrong?

Ok then... moving on.

[y.winter]

Where does it say that it's "and replace" - they only mention saving a housemate.

[Headie]

So what happened to this "consistent and well thought out/well planned" format? Now they're changing it to TWO people with the fewest votes are up alongside the 2+ nominees.

Same old messiness as usual! Back to basics my ass!

[bots]

Originally Posted by Hayden

So what happened to this "consistent and well thought out/well planned" format? Now they're changing it to TWO people with the fewest votes are up alongside the 2+ nominees.

Same old messiness as usual! Back to basics my ass!

on the app it said the 2 hm's with the most votes will be saved .... thats different, no?

edit: haha ... they have changed the text of it since i voted ... what you say is true

[TomC]

Although them changing it is annoying, it's a twist they're carrying on for the whole series so i don't mind as much, and at least she's telling us before the vote's taken place - i wouldn't put it past them to change it once they've seen who's at risk in the vote in previous seasons

[kingston]

I really don’t see why changing things up is such a bad thing... They’ve let us know ahead of The the vote what was happening and as production copped a lot of **** for head to head evictions in CBB22 it’s no wonder they’re giving us more nominees... This is really no different than when C4 would throw in a random vote to save...

[Cal.]

At first I thought they might be doing two public nominees because next week would be a double eviction but apparently not which just makes it a bit unnecessary.

[BBDodge]

They made a mistake. The public only put 1 housemate up and the task winner saved that housemate rendering the whole process redundant.

Now the public put 2 up and at least 1 of them will stay up.

Which doesn't mean that the public will vote them out in a Vote To Evict.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by BBDodge

Which doesn't mean that the public will vote them out in a Vote To Evict.

Interestingly I actually think that - other than maybe Isaac - it's UNlikely that the housemates who are bottom of the "vote to save" poll will end up going out in a "vote to evict" eviction. It'll be the less visible ones who go up as no one has bothered to vote for them, but no one will bother to vote to evict them either.

In the meantime, the housemates end up confused because "harmless" housemates are up for eviction and they can't figure out who nominated them.

I don't mind it as a twist. Twists to put extra people up are fine. I'm not such a big fan of twists where really unpopular housemates can end up being artificially saved from being at risk (immunity, etc.)

[Cherie]

I dont care, they can do what they like

[user104658]

They do not like or want head to head evictions. I don't think they thought this last one through at all as it inevitably generated a head to head... IMO it worked fairly well because "Lewis Vs Lewis" was kind of iconic, but for the most part, they want at least three up, so if they're going to continue doing "gamechanger" where one person is saved, they have to make it so that at least four are vulnerable.