[Samm]

bloody love this couple stunning name, this daughter will have excellent parents

[Joker.]

Congrats! Such a lovely name.

[Amy Jade]

I love the baby's name, it's so unique.

[Glenn.]

Wasn’t it King George’s nickname for Elizabeth?

[Captain.Remy]

People are mad over a name
Congrats to the parents and welcome to this wonderful little baby!

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Wasn’t it King George’s nickname for Elizabeth?

Yes it was, from when she was little.

Prince Philip just adopted it too.
Ridiculous to try to find fault with the name, just really petty and spiteful in my view.

[bots]

when people name a child after someone it is always a tribute, stealing the queens name is beyond absurd

[Ammi]

…Lilibet was speculated and reported by the media as a possible name some time ago …and indeed it’s the name that’s been chosen and now the same media are reporting…OMG, no…really…!!…

…it’s really impossible to make this stuff up….except they do on a daily basis…

[Crimson Dynamo]

[QUOTE=Ammi;11055497]…Lilibet was speculated and reported by the media as a possible name some time ago …and indeed it’s the name that’s been chosen and now the same media are reporting…OMG, no…really…!!…

/QUOTE]

links to both claims?

[jet]

Originally Posted by Ammi

…Lilibet was speculated and reported by the media as a possible name some time ago …and indeed it’s the name that’s been chosen and now the same media are reporting…OMG, no…really…!!…

…it’s really impossible to make this stuff up….except they do on a daily basis…

I never came across any speculation like that.

[AnnieK]

Originally Posted by jet

I never came across any speculation like that.

Lily has been touted for months as a nod toto Lilibet. A quick google will show countless articles showing that

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by AnnieK

Lily has been touted for months as a nod toto Lilibet. A quick google will show countless articles showing that

…yeah, I was just about to post as well that it was also speculated that the shortened version of Lily would be used only the media spelled it with a ‘y’ and it’s an ‘i’….the queen is also the first person to always approve names of any children born into the family so she would have approved any name that has been made official….obviously the media are their usual predictable selves of …oh really, how outrageous…how can we now spin this story to create this OUTRAGE….

[jet]

Originally Posted by AnnieK

Lily has been touted for months as a nod toto Lilibet. A quick google will show countless articles showing that

A 'possible' nod to Lilibet by calling the child Lily, a name I see they liked, isn't the same as actually christening the child Lilibet though...and isn't she going to get 'Lili'.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

by who?

how would anyone know what a parent would call a child months in advance?

what articles?

Because parents rarely wait until after a baby is born to discuss names.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by jet

the only one to call her by that special family name was her husband who always did so since they married.

How could you possibly know that, totally ridiculous

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by toy soldier

how could you possibly know that, totally ridiculous

because itv. Duh!!!

[jet]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

How could you possibly know that, totally ridiculous

Unless the Queens, Prince Philips and Prince Charles's official biographers are all outed as outrageous liars I'll take it they know better than me that it was his special name for her, used affectionatley only by him since the death of her father and Margaret.

[AnnieK]

Originally Posted by jet

Unless the Queens, Prince Philips and Prince Charles's official biographers are all outed as outrageous liars I'll take it they know better than me that it was his special name for her, used affectionatley only by him since the death of her father and Margaret.

The whole family know about the name...the public know about the name....whether Philip was the only one to use it, what does that actually matter? I'm really struggling as to why naming her Lilibet could be seen as any kind of slight.

It really is astounding that this is yet another stick to beat them with I can get the other family stuff but the birth of a child and the subsequent naming of that child is just bad taste imo and actually quite sad

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

How could you possibly know that, totally ridiculous

To be fair with the royals being obsessed by tradition and keeping things formal, you can’t really imagine any one calling the queen lilibet apart from her late father and prince Philip can you?

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by AnnieK

The whole family know about the name...the public know about the name....whether Philip was the only one to use it, what does that actually matter? I'm really struggling as to why naming her Lilibet could be seen as any kind of slight.

It really is astounding that this is yet another stick to beat them with I can get the other family stuff but the birth of a child and the subsequent naming of that child is just bad taste imo and actually quite sad

Didn’t one of the royals recently name there child as a tribute to prince Philip

[bots]

William and Harry referred to the queen as grandma lilibet, so the whole blinking family used it

[AnnieK]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

Didn’t one of the royals recently name there child as a tribute to prince Philip

Yep one of Andrew's girls called her baby August Philip

[AnnieK]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

William and Harry referred to the queen as grandma lilibet, so the whole blinking family used it

A voice.of reason.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by jet

Unless the Queens, Prince Philips and Prince Charles's official biographers are all outed as outrageous liars I'll take it they know better than me that it was his special name for her, used affectionatley only by him since the death of her father and Margaret.

Can you give me a reference on that? Which biographies? Which authors? On what pages?

Because to be frank - you back up an awful lot of your points with the evidence that "a royal source said it" or "a royal biographer wrote about it" but you never actually say where. We're just supposed to accept that they did... because you say so. It's not really evidence, is it... you could say literally whatever you want followed by "one of the biographers wrote it just trust me" .

[Swan]

Ok, i really don't wanna get involved in a Harry and Megan discussion ever again, it's always the same BS. I don't care for them i don't care what they do anymore. Anyway, the reason im popping in is to ask what 'licencing' a name actually means? Is it like, a future or current celeb wont be legally allowed to use that particular name as stage name or something??