[user104658]

Originally Posted by arista

"Minister for Men" THAT IS ALL OF THEM!

Minister for Mental Health, sure. Even at a STRETCH minister for men's mental health.

But minister "for men"...

Who will we have? Andrew Tate?

[Crimson Dynamo]

[arista]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

Yes Very True

BBC Newsnight last night
Pathetic Adam Boulton of
Talk TV/Times Radio Sundays
was so stupid


At least next to him
was a good reporter
talking about the Investor of GBnews
who is now looking to also buy
the Telegraph, or part of it

[Crimson Dynamo]

Our Jim has his say..

Youtube video

[The Slim Reaper]

What this discussion really needs, is someone who beats women to give an opinion

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

What this discussion really needs, is someone who beats women to give an opinion

so saith a Corbyn groupie

[Crimson Dynamo]

bearing in mind most MPs pretend not to know what a woman is I think that could be tricky

[user104658]

You know, of all the right wing commentators that people performatively pretend to have time for... I find Lozza Fox the hardest to accept. He's such a greasy ****ing weasel. Just a horrible, sneering letch... Regardless of his political views, I just don't buy for a second that anyone could stand to sit and have a pint with him or anything for longer than 10 minutes. ANYONE. He's the kid at school who thought he was your pal, but you'd have taken the long way around the building to avoid him if you saw him coming.

That may seem oddly specific, but we all knew that kid. If you didn't know that kid... I have bad news for you.

[Beso]

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy

You know, of all the right wing commentators that people performatively pretend to have time for... I find Lozza Fox the hardest to accept. He's such a greasy ****ing weasel. Just a horrible, sneering letch... Regardless of his political views, I just don't buy for a second that anyone could stand to sit and have a pint with him or anything for longer than 10 minutes. ANYONE. He's the kid at school who thought he was your pal, but you'd have taken the long way around the building to avoid him if you saw him coming.

That may seem oddly specific, but we all knew that kid. If you didn't know that kid... I have bad news for you.

I applaud your tolerance for others

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy

You know, of all the right wing commentators that people performatively pretend to have time for... I find Lozza Fox the hardest to accept. He's such a greasy ****ing weasel. Just a horrible, sneering letch... Regardless of his political views, I just don't buy for a second that anyone could stand to sit and have a pint with him or anything for longer than 10 minutes. ANYONE. He's the kid at school who thought he was your pal, but you'd have taken the long way around the building to avoid him if you saw him coming.

That may seem oddly specific, but we all knew that kid. If you didn't know that kid... I have bad news for you.

Unfortunately I knew that kid.

I actually feel bad about it nowadays as we all were quite mean to him, but yeah that type of kid existed in my life.

[bots]

yeah, but the majority of the uk don't give a toss about fox because we don't need to listen to him or watch him ever, whether he has been suspended from gb news or not. The same applies to wooten

[arista]

One Comment Ava saying no to a
Men's Health MP (talking to Geoff Norcott)
and her saying having a Mental Health MP?
lit the fuse for L.Fox.


He only has a One Hour show
Sack Him
is easy.

[bots]

Adam Boulton is just bitter he got the boot from sky

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

Adam Boulton is just bitter he got the boot from sky

he certainly comes across that way every time i have the misfortune to watch him

[Crimson Dynamo]

[Alf]

In bigger news. The impeachment hearing of the fake leader of the Western World and his family was happening today.

That's why you're probably distracted with this nonsense, inside the matrix.

[Alf]

But don't worry. I'm here to share with you what was said.

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by Alf

But don't worry. I'm here to share with you what was said.

Alf stop pretending you believe that sh1t. You're not as believable as you used to be.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

Alf stop pretending you believe that sh1t. You're as believable as you used to be.

oop personal attack = no basis for attack

(again)

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by leathertrumpet

oop personal attack = no basis for attack

(again)

again

again

again

again

Brackets.

again

Dun dun durr


Dweeb

[Alf]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

Alf stop pretending you believe that sh1t. You're not as believable as you used to be.

I follow "Forbes breaking news" on YouTube. That's why I've watched the arguments from this Biden Impeachment enquiry. It's a great channel that shows all arguments from both sides of the house in the senate hearings. You should follow. Then maybe you'd be believable? Instead of getting your inside information from the Communist main stream media.

[bots]

Originally Posted by Alf

I follow "Forbes breaking news" on YouTube. That's why I've watched the arguments from this Biden Impeachment enquiry. It's a great channel that shows all arguments from both sides of Congress. You should follow. Then maybe you'd be believable? Instead of getting your inside information from the Communist main stream media.

Yes, the country is filled with communist main stream media

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by Alf

I follow "Forbes breaking news" on YouTube. That's why I've watched the arguments from this Biden Impeachment enquiry. It's a great channel that shows all arguments from both sides of the house in the senate hearings. You should follow. Then maybe you'd be believable? Instead of getting your inside information from the Communist main stream media.

It's an inquiry that won't go anywhere because there is zero evidence of anything. You have to acknowledge that republicans being asked to provide evidence is really similar to conversations we have about providing evidence. Lot's of insinuation, never resulting the evidence that was asked for.

[Alf]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

It's an inquiry that won't go anywhere because there is zero evidence of anything. You have to acknowledge that republicans being asked to provide evidence is really similar to conversations we have about providing evidence. Lot's of insinuation, never resulting the evidence that was asked for.

Well let's see what evidence the enquiry produces first before being so cocky.

My point in this thread though is that this Laurence Fox/ Dan Wooten story Is a smokescreen so that you ain't looking at this impeachment enquiry. And the smokescreen is doing it's job with you.

There's far bigger fish to fry than what the mainstresm media want your attention focused on.

[Alf]

I'm so helpful to your education.

That's "Forbes breaking news" on YouTube.