[Zizu]

Originally Posted by Liam-

Are you always this misogynistic?

Clearly not given I prefer women over men in just about every conceivable situation..

Football and boxing / MMA the obvious exceptions


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[arista]

[joeysteele]

Oh that great avoider of truth, the gutter trash Mail.

She has actually said, she will produce her tax records if the Cons produce all theirs.
Which they won't.

Why anyone follows and takes notice of publications like the Mail or any other so called news papers, mystifies me.

Beats me as to why people are moaning about struggling with cost of living and energy costs.
Yet spend hundreds of pounds a year on ALL the now NON news? papers.
Who mostly print nonsense in the main now.

So much so they'd be better placed on comic or fiction stands

[Zizu]

Such a classy broad … fake fur coat , leapard-skin leggings and dock martin boots

Not many can pull that look off ..




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Zizu

Such a classy broad … fake fur coat , leapard-skin leggings and dock martin boots

Not many can pull that look off ..




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

You're not even attacking her for anything substantive- if you went after her for calling Tories "scum", you might have a point in that she acted in an "unparliamentary manner", and that's better than going on about her clothes.


And for the record, my only problem with her using that word was that she effectively handed a narrative over to the Tories and the gutter-press, and anything else from her speech was basically ignored.

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

You're not even attacking her for anything substantive- if you went after her for calling Tories "scum", you might have a point in that she acted in an "unparliamentary manner", and that's better than going on about her clothes.


And for the record, my only problem with her using that word was that she effectively handed a narrative over to the Tories and the gutter-press, and anything else from her speech was basically ignored.

I honestly can’t find one redeeming feature about her … apart from being female of course


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[bots]

Originally Posted by Zizu

I honestly can’t find one redeeming feature about her … apart from being female of course


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

I don't like her, but her achievements in politics have to be admired

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Zizu

I honestly can’t find one redeeming feature about her … apart from being female of course


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

I can think of a few.

[bots]

Zizu continues his attacks on how women dress

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

Zizu continues his attacks on how women dress

Woman


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[Ammi]

…I love that Angela Rayner has her own very definite style identification…to me that shows a strong presence who can hold their own and stand out in a male dominated world of politics and that’s what we would…/…or I would want to see from any politician as a good foundation …in terms of strong women and fashion/style and being an individual leader in their field, Vivienne Westwood is right up there as a British icon and she would have and always did veer from ‘the more traditional’….i personally don’t want my political people to be ‘uniform’, I want to see who they are and feel their individuality because they can be so important to our lives…

[Ammi]

…in terms of style as well…Angela is someone very refreshing to me as opposed to having a Prada draped PM that just screams….’I’m pretty much completely of a different species to many of the people I represent’…Rishi wears Prada and apparently the devil does as well…:NOT MY POLITICIAN banner:….

[arista]

Back on Topic

Raynor refuses to publish her data
of 2010

The person who advised her is dead

So Publish the Bloody Details


Ref: SkyNewsHD, GMBHD itv

[AnnieK]

The misogyny and sexism in this thread os astounding. Unbelievable

[arista]

Look if she Broke the Law
it will come out.

She knows what she did wrong
in 2010.

If she has done NOTHING WRONG,
simply Publish her 2010 DATA

[joeysteele]

Well done Mock for lifting the mood on this thread.

I personally agree with Ammi too in what she says.

Blinking in itself is not a sign of lying
It's other mannerisms and hand gestures and movements that more likely indicate people being economical with the truth.

I've a cousin that blinks incessantly when anyone is talking to her .
Always has done.

As for publishing anything, why should she .
Since it's private advice and finances.

If, I stress IF she is found by police or other standards committees to have done wrong
Then that's the time to publish such private documents.

As she says, when the Cons publish all their advice and tax issues freely, then so will she
I won't hold my breath waiting for Cons to do so nor their hard-line supporters expecting them to.

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

Well done Mock for lifting the mood on this thread.

I personally agree with Ammi too in what she says.

Blinking in itself is not a sign of lying
It's other mannerisms and hand gestures and movements that more likely indicate people being economical with the truth.

I've a cousin that blinks incessantly when anyone is talking to her .
Always has done.

As for publishing anything, why should she .
Since it's private advice and finances.

If, I stress IF she is found by police or other standards committees to have done wrong
Then that's the time to publish such private documents.

As she says, when the Cons publish all their advice and tax issues freely, then so will she
I won't hold my breath waiting for Cons to do so nor their hard-line supporters expecting them to.

Thanks Joey.

What evidence are the Tories expecting to find on her that they didn't find the first time?

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Mystic Mock

Thanks Joey.

What evidence are the Tories expecting to find on her that they didn't find the first time?

I haven't a clue as it seems there's nothing new from what was known before.

The police decided then there was nothing to investigate as to her directly.
It may well be they reach the same conclusion.

It's a Con MP who reported it to the police, when they refused to investigate.
He made a complaint about their decision.
So they have to look over it again because they have to honour complaints.

The only thing this highlights to me is that across the board a lot of things need simplifying as to MPs affairs with the fullest transparency from the lot of them.

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

I haven't a clue as it seems there's nothing new from what was known before.

The police decided then there was nothing to investigate as to her directly.
It may well be they reach the same conclusion.

It's a Con MP who reported it to the police, when they refused to investigate.
He made a complaint about their decision.
So they have to look over it again because they have to honour complaints.

The only thing this highlights to me is that across the board a lot of things need simplifying as to MPs affairs with the fullest transparency from the lot of them.

It just appears to be quite petty from the Tory MP tbh.

How many Politicians around the world have been involved in dodgy crimes? Yet it feels like Angela Rayner is being harshly singled out imo.

And that's if she is even guilty of what she's being accused of.

[Crimson Dynamo]

[Crimson Dynamo]

your turn luv?

[arista]

[If, I stress IF she is found by police or other standards committees to have done wrong
Then that's the time to publish such private documents.]

At last,
some Great Words on this thread.

[Beso]

Eddie Izzard could pull that off.

[Crimson Dynamo]

chilling

[arista]

Yes my Love
do not worry
the general election is not for months ahead