[Cherie]

I dont respond to Slim given he ranted like an A4 page against me, but its clear he quoted me and mentioned Farage, I have no control over who people vote for so its clear he is trying to link me to Farage, and then he calls me ****ing weird

[BBXX]

Originally Posted by Cherie

I dont respond to Slim given he ranted like an A4 page against me, but its clear he quoted me and mentioned Farage, I have no control over who people vote for so its clear he is trying to link me to Farage, and then he calls me ****ing weird

He didn't say you were a Farage fan in this thread, or link you with him...if you read his post you will see why he replied to you and mentioned Farage.

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by Cherie

I dont respond to Slim given he ranted like an A4 page against me, but its clear he quoted me and mentioned Farage, I have no control over who people vote for so its clear he is trying to link me to Farage, and then he calls me ****ing weird

You still don't get it. My post was clearly about reform cracking down on abortion rights when they get in, and why stories about women's rights in the US are an indication of what is coming here in a couple of years.

It had absolutely nothing to do with you supporting Farage, Robinson, or especially brexit.

If I reply to you and it's a post about German history; if I write Hitler and Cherie in the same post, under no circumstances does that mean I'm calling you hitler, or even more degrading, calling Hitler, cherie

I can't believe you're trying to double down on this nonsense.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by BBXX

Aside from that article screenshot, these are the newest cervical cancer news pieces below, and all reference women. Even the article she has screenshot says "Since the coronavirus pandemic, cervical screening attendance rates for women and other people with cervixes have been steadily declining, from 72.2% in 2020 to 68.4% in 2024, NHS England data shows."

You can probably find other articles too, under one of the Guardians main content hubs, which is titled... erm... 'Women'.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/...al-cancer-test

https://www.theguardian.com/society/...h-issue-survey

https://www.theguardian.com/society/...uts-risk-dying

You know when people talk about trying to create culture wars, it's those kids of tweets they're talking about. False information used to get people angry against specific demographics.

Also it's clear from that woman's feed she actually just hates any trans person who has any kind of visibility anywhere. She seems extremely hateful.

2 of your 3 examples omit the word woman from the headline and subheadline and that was her point...

[BBXX]

Originally Posted by Crimson Dynamo

2 of your 3 examples omit the word woman from the headline and subheadline and that was her point...

Unlike GB News consumers, most Guardian readers have the intellect to read past the headline and subheading and make a judgement off the actual content of the post.

Perhaps she should look under the section titled WOMEN on the website and see the word WOMEN displayed many times in headlines or captions if that makes her feel any better. But it won't, because she's outraged based on a false narrative she's pushing to create division.

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Crimson Dynamo

2 of your 3 examples omit the word woman from the headline and subheadline and that was her point...

What's the difference between gay men and men who have sex with men?

That article is written in a very bizarre way imo.

[Maru]

Originally Posted by Crimson Dynamo

I wouldn't say this was heroic by any measure, except it is a middle finger to the BBC.

Many women I suspect are done giving a **** and "shifts" seen here by media are less common examples of that. I would not say just women, though. People in general are tired of third parties trying to create both language and emotional obstacles/challenges that bare no resemblance to how one actually lives their lives.

[arista]

[I wouldn't say this was heroic by that any measure,
except it is a middle finger to the BBC.]


Yes they need that more

[Maru]

Originally Posted by arista

[I wouldn't say this was heroic by that any measure,
except it is a middle finger to the BBC.]


Yes they need that more

I will gladly take the BBC over the slop that gets delivered as news on US Cable. Just sayin'.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Other insiders said the mood music had changed at the BBC since Justin Webb, a Radio 4
Today show presenter, was censured last year for stating “transwomen, in other words,
males” on-air. “I think the fallout made them think: this is mad,” a source said.

It's understood BBC chairman Samir Shah was dismayed by the radio incident, which
took place before he joined the broadcaster.

[Swan]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

You ok, dude?

No, Andrew and Jordan coming round right now, we gonna sort out how to get women back in the kitchen dawg

[Swan]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

What moral high horse?

You can't see it? The irony?

I respect your Iran/Palestine/Iran argument.

Do you like DJ Quik?

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by Swan

You can't see it? The irony?

I respect your Iran/Palestine/Iran argument.

Do you like DJ Quik?

Ok, so let me explain where I'm coming from and you can see how you feel about what I write.

The main issue is that tibb is an echo chamber, and that's just a fact whether you like it or not. Who has differing opinions on this forum?

I always post my thoughts, and question posts that others have written. Sometimes I overstep the line (as we all do), but when folks support the murder of women and children, and someone comes along and says "actually I think it's really wrong," people find that really confronting, so rather than examine how and why they feel the way they do, the aim is to minimise that other person. It's why anti-Semitism and misogyny get thrown around so loosely, that the words have lost all meaning. You never see me running from those accusations, I'll always run towards them, because it's meaningless.

it's why folks who have absolutely no argument, always have to revert to saying "you just want to be right." As though that's a weird thing to aim for. Who wants to live their lives being wrong about everything?

I know I'm not right about everything, that's obvious, but I'm happy for anyone to question me about anything, and I'll always give my true thoughts in return.

if folks believe that to be a moral high horse, then that's fine with me.

I am chill, but I do definitely think that sometimes how dry/sarcastic I am irl, doesnt'translate that well on here