Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

BB9 Big Brother 9 in 2008 was won by Rachel Rice.

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 30-07-2008, 03:45 PM #51
fingers's Avatar
fingers fingers is offline
Viewer Emeritus
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Who wants to know?
Posts: 15,861


fingers fingers is offline
Viewer Emeritus
fingers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Who wants to know?
Posts: 15,861


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Red Moon
Quote:
Originally posted by LarryDavid
BB is cheating us again and the only way to beat them is to still vote Dale or Luke out!!!
No they are giving us the chance to vote the really cheaters out of the house. The ones that talk about nominations and make up codes to do it with. They are the people that are really manipulating the the nomination system.

If I said I cheated your granny out of £100,000 by using a secret code word system you would all be appalled and rightly so. However people it's ok to rig the nomination system to by making up codes to cheat a fellow housemate out of £100,000.

Come on get real.... these people are the cheats not Big Brother.
Why don't BB just invite their favourite into the Diary Room and offer him/her half the prize money in a small case?

Oh, wait, they did that before!!

Right Eugene?

fingers is offline  
Old 30-07-2008, 04:38 PM #52
Hurley Hurley is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20
Hurley Hurley is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by LarryDavid
Nominations have been discussed before and resulted in prison for HMs - now that it is rumoured that Luke and Dale are up - BB may decide that they can't risk losing either of them two so lo and behold......may put others up to sway the vote......they won't mind Mikey or Rachel going out.....what do people think - if they alter the nomination process, are they cheating us?
Totally agree. Pure BB cheating us and the public know it. Another TV phone in fraud. Beat BB vote Luke out
Hurley is offline  
Old 30-07-2008, 04:44 PM #53
Lizziex Lizziex is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 254
Lizziex Lizziex is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 254
Default

Long as Dale or Luke go ill be happy
Lizziex is offline  
Old 30-07-2008, 04:51 PM #54
Hurley Hurley is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20
Hurley Hurley is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by LarryDavid
Nominations have been discussed before and resulted in prison for HMs - now that it is rumoured that Luke and Dale are up - BB may decide that they can't risk losing either of them two so lo and behold......may put others up to sway the vote......they won't mind Mikey or Rachel going out.....what do people think - if they alter the nomination process, are they cheating us?
Totally. The only way to beat them is to vote Luke out. He has been manipulating people on voting from day 1. My only worry is that the phone numbers aren't out yet. Are cheating BB going to change the vote to 'vote for who you want to stay'. In that case Luke/Dale won't go.

Best thnig would be let the Hm think they are up but actually only Luke and Dale are up. That would be fair and stop them talking about nominations in the future. Comon BB don't cheat the public without us you have no show. Think about all the other TV phone ins that have been rigged - we don't need BB doing that too
Hurley is offline  
Old 30-07-2008, 04:53 PM #55
Hurley Hurley is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20
Hurley Hurley is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 20
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by xXEtchieXx
Not really, Big Brother reserves the right to change the rules at any time. They need people like Luke in there to keep people watching, so it is understandable.
Who wants to watch Luke - bitching and moaning is BORING. I turned off and so did millions of others - take a look at the viewing figures. BB much more inetresting since tits and screaming and bitching left - that was boring.
Hurley is offline  
Old 30-07-2008, 04:58 PM #56
bigbr0ther's Avatar
bigbr0ther bigbr0ther is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,645
bigbr0ther bigbr0ther is offline
Senior Member
bigbr0ther's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,645
Default

I'd really like to see Maysoon, Rachel, Kathreya, or Mohamed go because they're all really boring. Personally I'm not bothered because it seems like the obvious thing to do. Now that all of the big characters have gone, the only one left is Luke. The producers recognize that without Luke the show will be extremely dull. They're just trying to do the right thing and save the show from the stupidity of the voting public.
bigbr0ther is offline  
Old 30-07-2008, 05:54 PM #57
Red Moon's Avatar
Red Moon Red Moon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rutland
Posts: 25,358


Red Moon Red Moon is offline
Senior Member
Red Moon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rutland
Posts: 25,358


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by fingers
Why don't BB just invite their favourite into the Diary Room and offer him/her half the prize money in a small case?

Oh, wait, they did that before!!

Right Eugene?

They didn't ask him into the dairy room at all, they asked for one housemate to go into the dairy room and Eugene was the housemate that went in the room.

Right?

Quote:
Originally posted by Hurley
Totally agree. Pure BB cheating us and the public know it. Another TV phone in fraud. Beat BB vote Luke out
As I have said before:

If they really wanted to save Luke and Dale they would have just put up the 7 cheating scum bags, but they didn't they have let all 9 of them face the public vote.

So why didn't Big Brother not just put up the seven scum bags and really save Dale and Luke?

All I see here is a lot of upset Like haters who feel they have been cheated out of something by the housemates they support.
Red Moon is offline  
Old 30-07-2008, 05:56 PM #58
Big_Brutta Big_Brutta is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London, England.
Posts: 930
Big_Brutta Big_Brutta is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: London, England.
Posts: 930
Default

Quote:
As I have said before:

If they really wanted to save Luke and Dale they would have just put up the 7 cheating scum bags, but they didn't they have let all 9 of them face the public vote.
They obviously did that to lower the suspicion.
Big_Brutta is offline  
Old 30-07-2008, 06:00 PM #59
Red Moon's Avatar
Red Moon Red Moon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rutland
Posts: 25,358


Red Moon Red Moon is offline
Senior Member
Red Moon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rutland
Posts: 25,358


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Big_Brutta
Quote:
As I have said before:

If they really wanted to save Luke and Dale they would have just put up the 7 cheating scum bags, but they didn't they have let all 9 of them face the public vote.
They obviously did that to lower the suspicion.
Why would they bother about that when the people posting in this thread think it is a clearly a plan in any case. They knew what the reaction would be.

I still say if Big Brother wanted to save Dale and Luke it would have disregarded the nominations and put up just the 7 cheating scum bag cheaters.
Red Moon is offline  
Old 30-07-2008, 06:07 PM #60
LarryDavid LarryDavid is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 266
LarryDavid LarryDavid is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 266
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Red Moon
Quote:
Originally posted by Big_Brutta
Quote:
As I have said before:

If they really wanted to save Luke and Dale they would have just put up the 7 cheating scum bags, but they didn't they have let all 9 of them face the public vote.
They obviously did that to lower the suspicion.
Why would they bother about that when the people posting in this thread think it is a clearly a plan in any case. They knew what the reaction would be.

I still say if Big Brother wanted to save Dale and Luke it would have disregarded the nominations and put up just the 7 cheating scum bag cheaters.
Surely you must see what BB is doing, why suddenly put HMs up for nomination when in the past they didn't for more obvious discussions about nominations - it's all about money, viewers, phone calls and advertising.
LarryDavid is offline  
Old 30-07-2008, 06:13 PM #61
Red Moon's Avatar
Red Moon Red Moon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rutland
Posts: 25,358


Red Moon Red Moon is offline
Senior Member
Red Moon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rutland
Posts: 25,358


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by LarryDavid
Surely you must see what BB is doing, why suddenly put HMs up for nomination when in the past they didn't for more obvious discussions about nominations - it's all about money, viewers, phone calls and advertising.
Well, in that case turn off the TV take a hammer and smash the screen, get a pair of wire cutters and cut off the phone then jump up and down on your mobile. There you go you have beat Big Brother and your not playing their little game any more.

Of course Big Brother wants, more money, more viewers and a bigger income from advertising. It is a TV company and it has to make enough money to make the programmes and turn in a profit for the share holders. It's not there just to please the viewers it has other interests too.
Red Moon is offline  
Old 30-07-2008, 06:36 PM #62
LarryDavid LarryDavid is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 266
LarryDavid LarryDavid is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 266
Default

Well admitted, but if they deliberately alter the rules etc to gain from the viewer, they will be in breach and in trouble - If Blue Peter can be charged - then BB is not safe!!!
LarryDavid is offline  
Old 30-07-2008, 06:51 PM #63
Red Moon's Avatar
Red Moon Red Moon is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rutland
Posts: 25,358


Red Moon Red Moon is offline
Senior Member
Red Moon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Rutland
Posts: 25,358


Default

Quote:
Originally posted by LarryDavid
Well admitted, but if they deliberately alter the rules etc to gain from the viewer, they will be in breach and in trouble - If Blue Peter can be charged - then BB is not safe!!!
I didn't admit anything, all I said is TV companies need to make money. Simple equation

No Money = No Programmes = No Big Brother

Big Brother makes the rules. If you read the rules and you will see what I mean ( BB Rules). The last rule states:
Quote:
THE MOST IMPORTANT RULE OF ALL: Big Brother reserves the right to change the rules at any time.
So give the final rule which of there own rules did they break exactly?
Red Moon is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
big brother, god, merged, playing, related, threads


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts