[Smithy]

Originally Posted by parmnion

She has already shown her cowardice by snitching on piers to his bosses.

Yeah that was deffo Meghan fault

[bots]

Originally Posted by parmnion

She has already shown her cowardice by snitching on piers to his bosses.

it's hardly snitching when he was broadcasting it to millions

People have a right of opinion and also have a right to complain when they are misrepresented. I am not a meghan fan, but piers went way to far. Demented is actually how i would describe him

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by parmnion

The facts are, piers morgan poured her in a taxi one night and sent her on her way to a party where she met prince harry.

Piers Morgan actions are those of a scorned man.

He's a pathetic idiot, his obsession with Meghan is the most unhealthy thing I've seen.

Question what does his wife think to his creepy behaviour !

[Vanessa]

Some of their "facts" are inaccurate.
She said she didn't know who Harry was before they married.
That's not true.
And that she didn't really know her half sister, which is also not true.
Samantha said they were in contact over the years. There are pictures that prove it.

[Josy]

Originally Posted by Smithy

Yeah that was deffo Meghan fault

Meghan did contact ITV with a complaint tbf it was on sky news earlier.

And she was quite right too imo.

However that was 1 complaint, Ofcom received over 40k from the public.

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Josy

Meghan did contact ITV with a complaint tbf it was on sky news earlier.

And she was quite right too imo.

However that was 1 complaint, Ofcom received over 40k from the public.

Exactly

[jet]

Originally Posted by Vanessa

Some of their "facts" are inaccurate.
She said she didn't know who Harry was before they married.
That's not true.
And that she didn't really know her half sister, which is also not true.
Samantha said they were in contact over the years. There are pictures that prove it.

Yes, she told many other porkies as well. 'Meghan's' truth and 'the' truth are 2 different things.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Originally Posted by Vanessa

Some of their "facts" are inaccurate.
She said she didn't know who Harry was before they married.
That's not true.
And that she didn't really know her half sister, which is also not true.
Samantha said they were in contact over the years. There are pictures that prove it.

It's the tip of the iceberg Ness

It won't end well..

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Josy

Meghan did contact ITV with a complaint tbf it was on sky news earlier.

And she was quite right too imo.

However that was 1 complaint, Ofcom received over 40k from the public.

That's right.

I do think she was right too, to complain.
He was, for being a presenter really like a man obsessed and demented.his ridiculous rantings would have been out of place anywhere.
Never mind in a workplace.

He's always been controversial though.
While I've agreed with some of his forceful interviewing during the pandemic.
His attitude of not letting others speak, even as to his co host.
Was tedious and became awful to watch really.

He just couldn't take truth being fired at him, very calmly by another.
So he childishly walked off the set.

Sadly he'll be back on other things and channels however.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Vanessa

Some of their "facts" are inaccurate.
She said she didn't know who Harry was before they married.

She didn't know who he was before they got married? I think you might have gotten the wrong end of the stick there - she didn't think she was on MAFS

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Zizu

You’re really suggesting that the Queen wasn’t aware of Charley-boy fornicating with Cammy when he was courting Di and throughout their sham of a marriage ??

Queenie conveniently turned a blind eye throughout as they needed a healthy young female to provide some babies ...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

I actually don't think Zizu, the Queen knows much that does go on in her family or with those employed to impose the Royal duty list of rules.
Or how they carry it out.

The Queen and the family treated Princess Diana disgracefully in my view.

I'd hope now that this has surfaced and that it's not just an outside addition to the Royals speaking out as In Meghan, however it's also a full Royal her grandson Prince Harry too.

That the Queen, still seeking sharp as ever will now genuinely look to trying to bring healing.
I'm not holding my breath on that.


On other issues now too.
One thing is likely and I feel Prince Harry and Meghan will have done this.
The Queen has stated she wants this dealt with privately as a family.

So she will need to have been told who made the inappropriate and more likely racist remark.
So the finger isn't pointed at all of them.
Dealing with it privately would indicate it's the Queen's intention to never have that said publicly or that she will have the Palace reveal who it is either.

HOWEVER, she'll likely even possibly now know who it was.
As she owes that to Prince Harry and Meghan to have that information in order to ' deal,' with it.
Plus Prince Harry and Meghan, need to tell her who it is too.

The Queen chose her wording carefully, she has stated that racist issue and mental health issues will be dealt with privately as a family.
Which means nothing will reach the public domain as to it.

She has taken in my view, the fact Prince Harry and Meghan never named anyone publicly.
Hence the now dealing privately the Queen has stated, which means as to that, the Queen can ensure it never does get revealed to the public who it was.

I think that wrong, because I think we should know who of the Royal family would ask such an inappropriate question.

However this is how the Palace controls totally.

[rusticgal]

Meghan is a coward and hasn’t the guts to be interviewed by anyone who would challenge her accusations or comments...

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Meghan is a coward and hasn’t the guts to be interviewed by anyone who would challenge her accusations or comments...

How do you know this exactly ..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[jet]

The new battle royal - Palace says it gave top courtier to help Meghan, while Team Sussex says the duchess was abandoned

Palace staff watched Harry and Meghan’s interview in horror as they claimed she was left completely unsupported when she joined the Royal Family, it emerged last night.
The Daily Mail can reveal there is genuine hurt that the couple have perpetuated the image that Meghan was cut adrift and left to fend for herself.

In fact, sources say, the duchess was given a string of the Queen’s most senior staff as ‘mentors’ after the couple became engaged, as well as being allowed to hand-pick her own 15-strong team of loyal and talented private office staff.

‘It is very disingenuous to make such a sweeping generalisation,’ one insider said. ‘There was a brilliant team of very experienced and loyal aides to help them. Sadly, she and Harry were willing to listen to no one. And that is the honest truth.’

The Queen even personally persuaded her long-standing and extremely popular former deputy private secretary Samantha Cohen, who had just handed in her notice after working for the Royal Household for the best part of two decades, to stay on and work for the couple.
She was their first joint private secretary, running their private and public lives rather like a chief of staff.

One of her main roles was to help navigate Meghan through the wedding and prepare her for royal life. These included regular tutoring sessions on everything from royal etiquette to diplomatic protocol at Kensington Palace.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

She didn't know who he was before they got married? I think you might have gotten the wrong end of the stick there - she didn't think she was on MAFS

Vanessa is right...she said she did not know who Prince Harry was before she met him...

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Meghan is a coward and hasn’t the guts to be interviewed by anyone who would challenge her accusations or comments...

Make up your mind

One minute she's making too many limelight appearances , she was criticised for the Oprah interview before it was aired.

And now you want to see her in more interviews??

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Zizu

How do you know this exactly ..


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

The engagement interview was the first...no pressing questions obviously.
The documentary filmed by Harry’s friend just allowed them to air their sob story...and then Oprah...a friend of Meghan who gave a bias interview with no pressing questions other than allowing them to point finger and blame on others without channeling further questions to get an unbiased picture.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

Make up your mind

One minute she's making too many limelight appearances , she was criticised for the Oprah interview before it was aired.

And now you want to see her in more interviews??

I would like to see her challenged on her accusations...we all knew the Oprah interview was going to be utterly biased...she didn’t challenge her on any of her answers just allowed her to say what Meghan wanted to say. It was pathetic.

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

I would like to see her challenged on her accusations...we all knew the Oprah interview was going to be utterly biased...she didn’t challenge her on any of her answers just allowed her to say what Meghan wanted to say. It was pathetic.

It was a relaxed interview with Oprah to tell her story, it was NOT an interrogation debate .

As I said already the interview would of been farr too long if they went on about her dad & sister etc, and Meghan would get more critism if the interview broadcast over a few days rather than just 1 day.

But don't worry there's plenty of long winded interviews out there, that go on forever that you'll probably enjoy better than Harry & Meghan's 2 hour one.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Vanessa is right...she said she did not know who Prince Harry was before she met him...

Originally Posted by Vanessa

Some of their "facts" are inaccurate.
She said she didn't know who Harry was before they married.

Maybe she meant "met", but as you can see, the actual post as-written is a ludicrous claim.

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Maybe she meant "met", but as you can see, the actual post as-written is a ludicrous claim.

She never said she didn't know who the royals were though, she just didn't know much about Harry . I don't think she researched his life .

And tbh I've always thought the Americans seemed a bit out of touch with the monarchy as they don't have that , yes some of them are interested in the royal family but how many of them know the history?.

Even Brits themselves don't know everything, unless they're a royalist .

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

Maybe she meant "met", but as you can see, the actual post as-written is a ludicrous claim.

I was thinking that ... more or less everyone in the world will have heard about Harry and knew of him ... that’s not the same as ‘knowing him’ ..

Things get changed around anyways... by the time something gets to print


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Zizu

I was thinking that ... more or less everyone in the world will have heard about Harry and knew of him ... that’s not the same as ‘knowing him’ ..

Things get changed around anyways... by the time something gets to print


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

Yeah she didn't know him personally yet

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

Yeah she didn't know him personally yet

Exactly.

It's still petty nitpicking in my view.
However for my own sanity, I'm not even going to attempt to reason with those there's no reasoning with.

I hate to see character assassination of anyone unnecessarily, I always think what if that was one of my family on the receiving end of that.
Especially against someone no one really knows, has never met, likely never will.
So has had no direct contact with.

The personal character assassination is what drives people to take their lives and cause deep emotional problems.

If it's someone like a politician for instance, that's a little different, because although we don't know politicians, all of them can and do impact on our lives by what they do in power.
Off topic, I have intense dislike of Boris Johnson, as a politician, for his actions as one and PM.

However when he was ill with covid, I hoped fur his recovery, I don't know him personally..
It's obvious he has loyalties to some friends and others in a personal sense.
I hate his politics.

I'll never know Meghan Markle, there's no way just out of decency, even, that I'd dismiss her mental health concerns, only she could know how she felt then.
Not the shock and hurt they both would feel at a family member questioning re the colour of their baby to be's skin.
What on earth should it matter what the skin colour would be.

I'm pleased the Queen has said those,2 things are serious concerns and she is saddened at the feelings and struggle her Grandson and his wife have had and felt through this time.
Since the Queen herself can accept these are serious issues..
Whose now showing the real disrespect to the Queen by inferring her Grandson and his wife are nothing other than liars and should be cast aside completely.

I doubt Her Majesty the Queen would in any way entertain or approve of such character assassination of these ''still much loved members of her family''.
( The Queen's own words that last line).
Plus of course the Queen is one who definitely knows her Grandson and his wife.

[Beso]

One of Meghan's friends was given permission by meghan yesterday to appear on tv to say that there are emails about Meghan contacting he palace staff about her mental health..she said she lived it with her....hopefully it wssnt one if the friends Meghan's said she couldnt even meet for a coffee.