[Mystic Mock]

I still standby that Ash is the only one that will standout for the guys (weather you like him or not) by the end of the series.

And Danielle is so overrated for the girls, if it wasn't for Ashleigh you wouldn't even know she existed.

[Gerbil901]

Originally Posted by The Mockinator

I still standby that Ash is the only one that will standout for the guys (weather you like him or not) by the end of the series.

And Danielle is so overrated for the girls, if it wasn't for Ashleigh you wouldn't even know she existed.

If it wasn't for Toya you wouldn't know that either of those girls existed.

[Mystic Mock]

Originally Posted by Gerbil901

If it wasn't for Toya you wouldn't know that either of those girls existed.

Your bang on tbh, but I do think Ashleigh will bring some entertainment to the table at least, Danielle just says stupid things and is pretending that she's something that she's not.

[Macie Lightfoot]

Originally Posted by Josy

Every single thing on that list had one or more threads created about them, just because YOU don't think it was a talking point doesn't make it true.

Why are you always so quick to throw out the subjective card when someone disagrees with you? People try to actually have discussions with you but then you just go "well different people have different opinions" and offer no actual defense to your opinion.

What my point WAS going to be was that there needs to be depth to talking points. You know, so there are things to actually talk about. Whether or not there were threads about Marlon tripping doesn't mean it's a talking point. Conversation starts and ends with "LOL ouch he fell hard x" and there's nothing for people to actually talk about.

But I'm sure you'll just say different people have different definitions of talking points and dismiss what I have to say even further.

[Josy]

Originally Posted by troynuncdicit

Why are you always so quick to throw out the subjective card when someone disagrees with you? People try to actually have discussions with you but then you just go "well different people have different opinions" and offer no actual defense to your opinion.

What my point WAS going to be was that there needs to be depth to talking points. You know, so there are things to actually talk about. Whether or not there were threads about Marlon tripping doesn't mean it's a talking point. Conversation starts and ends with "LOL ouch he fell hard x" and there's nothing for people to actually talk about.

But I'm sure you'll just say different people have different definitions of talking points and dismiss what I have to say even further.

I was on my phone when I replied with that one line comment.

I think you are concentrating far too much on one item from the list I posted tbh there were plenty more things on that list that did in fact create in depth talk points, the arguments just for an example we had multiple threads with lots of pages, I do see your point with the Marlon falling over thing but it was very selective to choose the most minor talking point from my list and go with that.

And I reply in depth to people that actually want a discussion without feeling the need to snipe and belittle whilst putting their point across.

[erinp5]

If there was ever a series crying out for new Hms it's this one .

[Razor]

I would like to see some more housemates to stir the pot so to speak.