[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Toy Soldier

So Marsh's summary is that this person felt physically more comfortable in dresses and that's why she chooses to wear them, is backed up by a statement that makes it abundantly clear that she is referring to feeling more comfortable as an individual / as an identity (and not the physical comfort of the softer fabric ) oh and also states that she has actually had her male genitals removed.

But yes all of this clearly would lead to the conclusion that this is just "just a bloke who felt more physically comfortable in female clothes so wears dresses".

Clear as day.




No what is in fact going on here is that people are OK with trans so long as the individual looks and sounds feminine and pretty, but "ugly trans" isn't allowed and those blokes should get their overalls back on. Amirite? Disgusting pervs, how DARE they not have dainty features .

Oh dear. Bitter are we?

If you'd like to take a stab at what I actually said and not this pathetic attempt at baiting I might respond.

Instead of putting words in people's mouths, offer your own opinion. Or do you remain incapable?