| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| BB11 Channel 4's last Big Brother series started June 2010. Josie Gibson was the winner. All the gossip about the Big Brother 11 house, series and housemates here! |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
I am absolutely gobsmacked that JJ1 has not had his head seriously felt before, but then I doubt he would DARE to come out with some of the sh*t he does to people in the outside world where he doesn't have the protection of the BB house. I guarantee he'll have more than just Nathan to contend with once he's out - karma sure is a bitch.
__________________
![]() 5 Kings: 1 throne |
|||
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
__________________
You don't have to be mad to post on tibb,But it helps
|
||
|
|
|
|
#3 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Nathan, Govan, Corin and Josie all told him he was wrong behaving the way he does towards Rachael.
__________________
I wouldn't believe your wireless radio. If I had myself a flying giraffe you'd have one in a box with a window, but you can have it all if you like, you can have it all if you like and you can pay for it the rest of your life... life... |
|||
|
|
|
|
#4 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
BB are completely out of order for letting that happen, intimidation at the least. Nathan's (the caveman) actions are obviously no surprise, what about Rachael in all this. She knew Nathan was watching and was up for the argument.
|
||
|
|
|
|
#5 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
He could have been nice to her even pretended to be civil, but he just chose to rip bits out of her and make her feel like **** when there was no need for it If anything it just showed John James up for what he really is, let that be a warning to any women out there who might bump into him in a club over the next few months
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#6 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
|
#7 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
She knew exactly what she was doing and I watched most of it and John went in there with the purpose of trying to be nice, she popped at him straight away and the looks she was giving him, she was giving it the large one knowing Nathan was watching, shame on the producers I think they have targeted John throughout this BB with the tasks 90% of them have been negative towards him but yesterday was a right hatchet job. By the way Rachel looked an absolute mess.
|
||
|
|
|
|
#8 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
Last edited by psychtracker; 19-08-2010 at 08:31 AM. |
||
|
|
|
|
#9 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
look he is going on friday why kiss his ass now...bb are just getting every ounce of tv out of crab eyes....he has given them a headache this year and the way he speaks to bb is disrespectful
__________________
You don't have to be mad to post on tibb,But it helps
|
||
|
|
|
|
#10 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
To be fair, i think he was only partly stitched up by BB. He did actually have the choice of receiving a massage from Rachael1 or giving a massage to Rachel2. It was also totally unsurprising that Rachael would be involved in a John task, given he's spoken about her on a weekly basis in the 8 weeks or so, since she'd left. The argument was sarcasm on both sides, and i think Rachael handled herself ok. The fact that Nathan was behind the mirror, makes no real difference, because if he wasn't there, he would have been told about it - in detail by Rachael anyways, or seen the footage. It should also be mentioned that, even though Rachael wasn't Nathans GF at the time, i don't recall him ever stepping in - to defend Rachael - over her and John's disagreements. Same again with Corin, when John was taking the piss out of her, i don't recall Nathan ever stepping in and having words to John about his behaviour, in the past. Where was Nathan then?
Last edited by psychtracker; 19-08-2010 at 07:43 AM. |
||
|
|
|
|
#11 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
He's making excuses he's **** scared of a lot of stuff he know's he's going to get some **** when he gets out and he wont be able to cope with it.While in the house he can mouth all he wants but when he get's out its a differnt ball game.
Get the ****** back where you come from. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#12 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
i'm confused. you on about that annoying rachael and nathan that were on bb? whats happened.
|
||
|
|
|
|
#13 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
are rachael and nathan together?
|
||
|
|
|
|
#14 | ||
|
|||
|
Member
|
To be fair, this whole argument is pointless. If Nathan really did say what you claim it hasn't done any harm to John James, seeing as he is still in the house (Surprise, Surprise)
He is so desperate to win that no fool from Manchester is going to make him quit, especially after the amount of times he has claimed he wanted to walk... But I ask this... Why do you find it appalling for Nathan to allegedly make John James feel so worried that he must leave the show but totally acceptable for John James to tell Corin that she can either wear no makeup or leave? Double standards? I think so... And I am not having a go at one person in particular, just anyone who is a fan of JJ1. Because, once again, it is only bad when it happens to John James... |
||
|
|
|
|
#15 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
Ah John James feel so sorry for him the poor little bitty scaredy cat!!!! John James intimadates, bullies, argues and ridicules all those he takes a dislike to on sight without any reason and without even getting to know them - mainly women - he gets one whiff of Nathan/public not liking his attitude and he runs scared screaming the "BB stitched me up" theory. As with all bullies when confronted by someone who doesn't tolerate their behaviour they run a mile with their tails between their legs and proper order too its about time he was made to account for his behaviour ............. so run John James run - you pathetic person - no one gives a damn!!
|
||
|
|
|
|
#16 | ||
|
|||
|
Senior Member
|
Funny nathan is shouting his mouth now being the big man, yet in there barely said a word when john was arguing with people?
Thing is it happened ages ago whats the point in making a deal of it.. though it would be stupid to think nathan would do anything, he done anything with the camera on and he'd be done..
__________________
![]() ![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
#17 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() RIP Pyramid, Andyman ,Kerry and Lex xx https://www.facebook.com/JamesBulgerMT/?fref=photo "If slaughterhouses had glass walls, most people would be vegetarian" |
|||
|
|
|
|
#18 | |||
|
||||
|
One, but not the same.
|
Quote:
Noticed Nathan didnt say anything to JJ in the house though!! But suppose he has to make some money somewhere after being kicked out early days.
__________________
![]() U2 San Sebastian Sept 2010 |
|||
|
|
|
|
#19 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() RIP Pyramid, Andyman ,Kerry and Lex xx https://www.facebook.com/JamesBulgerMT/?fref=photo "If slaughterhouses had glass walls, most people would be vegetarian" |
|||
|
|
|
|
#20 | |||
|
||||
|
Flag shagger.
|
Wht a load of testosterone-soaked, posturing bullsh!t. As if anyone's going to allow Nathan to touch John James. And if he does, he will probably have a lawsuit on his hands. It's a mountain built out of a molehill.
John James is my least favourite housemate... but I have to say that I think this is a vain attempt by Nathan to look like a hard man and also to draw some attention to himself before we all start saying "Nathan? Nathan who?" Last edited by Livia; 19-08-2010 at 09:04 AM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#21 | |||
|
||||
|
One, but not the same.
|
Quote:
I agree with what you said about Nathan, he is probably more angry about being kicked out than being mad at JJ. Publicity stuff on his part.
__________________
![]() U2 San Sebastian Sept 2010 |
|||
|
|
|
|
#22 | |||
|
||||
|
Senior Member
|
Immature behaviour on all three accounts: John James, Rachael and Nathan.
I thought Rachael was still hurt by John James' earlier behaviour and wanted to understand it but didn't. It was immature of her to say "well, I've got a boyfriend now..." John James is just plain wrong and he should also be able to stand behind his words and principles even when he thinks someone has said they want to kick his arse. As for Nathan, it's immature of him to say he's going to kick his arse. They are free to disagree but resorting to violence is no answer. Enough of emotional damage has been done already. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#23 | |||
|
||||
|
Piss orf.
|
Nathan has a face like melted leather...
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#25 | |||
|
||||
|
Get it? Got it? Good!
|
Nathan does have Twitter...
Quote:
John James deserves all he gets & more... About time he realised that he cannot go through life bullying people as it will eventually come back on yourself...
__________________
![]() Last edited by flamingGalah!; 19-08-2010 at 01:26 PM. |
|||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|