Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

Serious Debates & News Debate and discussion about political, moral, philosophical, celebrity and news topics.

Register to reply Log in to reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 07-02-2013, 12:24 AM #101
Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Default

Indeed it is about gay marriage, and you appear to be implying that such legislation should be pushed back further in order to satisfy the needs of the rest of the electorate, to which I'm saying the battle to get this day to arrive has been far too long and difficult for those involved for us just to turn around and say 'ah well it should've been done another day tbh!', the wait has been far too long. The interests of this particular minority group are, in this instance, more important than anything else.
Jack_ is offline  
Old 07-02-2013, 12:36 AM #102
Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Omah View Post
Of course it does - we live in a democracy
That's another debate entirely.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Omah View Post
where an oppressed and unequal minority has won substantial rights but where the interests of the majority hold sway.

Again, said 'majority' have, by and large, not experienced for themselves the hardship that has faced LGBT people for decades, and not understood the desperation that they have to get married. It's very easy for Dave, a 40 year old married, straight man with two children to say 'well I want the immigration problem to be sorted out before this gay marriage stuff!', regardless of whether he supports it or not, when he himself has not experienced first-hand what it is like to be a gay man with a partner, wishing to get married, and having wished and hoped for that all of his life.

This issue has gone on for far too long to just be brushed aside. Once it's dealt with, and LGBT have been given the equality they so rightly deserve, then, just as I hope and understand too, the focus can return to the other issues facing the UK. I am no Tory, and I too certainly question whether this is a ploy by Cameron to deflect attention away from other coalition policies, but quite frankly I couldn't care less - pushing this legislation forward is much more important than endless cynicism.
Jack_ is offline  
Old 07-02-2013, 12:37 AM #103
Omah Omah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tralfamadore
Posts: 10,343
Omah Omah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tralfamadore
Posts: 10,343
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_ View Post
Indeed it is about gay marriage, and you appear to be implying that such legislation should be pushed back further in order to satisfy the needs of the rest of the electorate, to which I'm saying the battle to get this day to arrive has been far too long and difficult for those involved for us just to turn around and say 'ah well it should've been done another day tbh!', the wait has been far too long. The interests of this particular minority group are, in this instance, more important than anything else.
No, they're not.

Last edited by Omah; 07-02-2013 at 12:47 AM.
Omah is offline  
Old 07-02-2013, 12:39 AM #104
Omah Omah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tralfamadore
Posts: 10,343
Omah Omah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tralfamadore
Posts: 10,343
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_ View Post
That's another debate entirely.



Again, said 'majority' have, by and large, not experienced for themselves the hardship that has faced LGBT people for decades, and not understood the desperation that they have to get married. It's very easy for Dave, a 40 year old married, straight man with two children to say 'well I want the immigration problem to be sorted out before this gay marriage stuff!', regardless of whether he supports it or not, when he himself has not experienced first-hand what it is like to be a gay man with a partner, wishing to get married, and having wished and hoped for that all of his life.

This issue has gone on for far too long to just be brushed aside. Once it's dealt with, and LGBT have been given the equality they so rightly deserve, then, just as I hope and understand too, the focus can return to the other issues facing the UK. I am no Tory, and I too certainly question whether this is a ploy by Cameron to deflect attention away from other coalition policies, but quite frankly I couldn't care less - pushing this legislation forward is much more important than endless cynicism.
Quite frankly, on this issue, the electorate couldn't care less.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisf...ervative-party

Quote:
The politics of same-sex marriage provide a drama at two levels. One is the issue itself; the other is the impact on voters of the dispute inside the Conservative party.

As for the intrinsic merits of the issue, most people back a change in the law to allow same-sex couples to marry. YouGov's latest poll for the Sunday Times finds that 55% support reform, while 36% oppose it.

Not only is opposition to reform a minority view; it's also an issue that commands the passions of only a tiny number. We asked people which three or four issues, out of a list of 15, "will be important to you in deciding how you vote at the next election". The top three are the economy (56%), immigration (42%) and health (26%). Same-sex marriage comes 12th, cited by just 7%. And that 7% divides 4:3 in saying they would be "more likely" rather than "less likely" to vote for a party that supports same-sex marriage.

In short, this is not an issue that will decide the next election. Politicians who claim to form their views by "listening to voters" should be wary of employing "my postbag" as a reason to resist gay marriage. This is one of those controversies – fox-hunting a decade ago was another – where the number and intensity of letter-writers bears no relation to the views of the wider public.

Last edited by Omah; 07-02-2013 at 12:46 AM.
Omah is offline  
Old 07-02-2013, 12:51 AM #105
Glenn.'s Avatar
Glenn. Glenn. is offline
SIGH
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 23,777


Glenn. Glenn. is offline
SIGH
Glenn.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 23,777


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_ View Post
Again, said 'majority' have, by and large, not experienced for themselves the hardship that has faced LGBT people for decades, and not understood the desperation that they have to get married. It's very easy for Dave, a 40 year old married, straight man with two children to say 'well I want the immigration problem to be sorted out before this gay marriage stuff!', regardless of whether he supports it or not, when he himself has not experienced first-hand what it is like to be a gay man with a partner, wishing to get married, and having wished and hoped for that all of his life.

This issue has gone on for far too long to just be brushed aside. Once it's dealt with, and LGBT have been given the equality they so rightly deserve, then, just as I hope and understand too, the focus can return to the other issues facing the UK. I am no Tory, and I too certainly question whether this is a ploy by Cameron to deflect attention away from other coalition policies, but quite frankly I couldn't care less - pushing this legislation forward is much more important than endless cynicism.


I'm not one for politics but since the Coalition began running this country, passing this bill seems to be the only good thing they've actually done.
__________________




Hadn't thought of you in a long time
But you keep sending me funny valentines
And I know you think it comes off vicious
But it's precious, adorable
Like a toy chihuahua barking at me from a tiny purse
That's how much it hurts
How many times has your boyfriend said
"Why are we always talking 'bout her?"


………….
Glenn. is offline  
Old 07-02-2013, 12:59 AM #106
Omah Omah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tralfamadore
Posts: 10,343
Omah Omah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tralfamadore
Posts: 10,343
Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_ View Post
Again, said 'majority' have, by and large, not experienced for themselves the hardship that has faced LGBT people for decades, and not understood the desperation that they have to get married. It's very easy for Dave, a 40 year old married, straight man with two children to say 'well I want the immigration problem to be sorted out before this gay marriage stuff!', regardless of whether he supports it or not, when he himself has not experienced first-hand what it is like to be a gay man with a partner, wishing to get married, and having wished and hoped for that all of his life.
and your experience?
Omah is offline  
Old 07-02-2013, 01:01 AM #107
Glenn.'s Avatar
Glenn. Glenn. is offline
SIGH
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 23,777


Glenn. Glenn. is offline
SIGH
Glenn.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 23,777


Default

Why should gay marriage be pushed aside though? That's what I don't get.
__________________




Hadn't thought of you in a long time
But you keep sending me funny valentines
And I know you think it comes off vicious
But it's precious, adorable
Like a toy chihuahua barking at me from a tiny purse
That's how much it hurts
How many times has your boyfriend said
"Why are we always talking 'bout her?"


………….
Glenn. is offline  
Old 07-02-2013, 01:05 AM #108
Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Omah View Post
No, they're not.
Yes, they are. A marginalised section of society's opportunity to bring themselves up to the level of the rest of the country who can already get married is of much greater importance than issues facing the majority of the electorate. Issues that, whilst important, can wait - especially considering this piece of legislation has had just about enough of a wait, thanks.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Omah View Post
Quite frankly, on this issue, the electorate couldn't care less.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisf...ervative-party



You're not getting it are you? No opinion poll or statistic is going to change the fact that regardless of your political beliefs, what you consider to be pressing issues facing this country, whether you support same sex marriage or not - this is a long overdue piece of legislation that a minority group have waited decades for and it is essential that it is passed sooner rather than later (as it should have been passed years ago), so that equality prevails, bigotry is given a kicking and we as a society can move on and this no longer has to be an issue.
Jack_ is offline  
Old 07-02-2013, 01:08 AM #109
Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Omah View Post
and your experience?
...which is completely irrelevant considering the debate here is over the lack of experiences the majority of the apathetic electorate have had on this issue. I'm not apathetic to this bill, therefore I am not part of this majority that you continually keep referring to.
Jack_ is offline  
Old 07-02-2013, 01:15 AM #110
Omah Omah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tralfamadore
Posts: 10,343
Omah Omah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tralfamadore
Posts: 10,343
Arrow

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn View Post
Why should gay marriage be pushed aside though? That's what I don't get.
The issue, AFAIC, is not that it should be pushed aside but that Cameron has brought gay marriage to the fore on a pretext that was neither in the Conservative Party manifesto nor given to the government as a mandate by the electorate - since well over 40 election promises have already been broken, why has Cameron placed so much emphasis on the success, and publicity, of an issue which concerns almost none of the electorate but which antagonises his own party while satisfying the aims of the opposition?

Omah is offline  
Old 07-02-2013, 01:19 AM #111
Omah Omah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tralfamadore
Posts: 10,343
Omah Omah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tralfamadore
Posts: 10,343
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_ View Post
...which is completely irrelevant considering the debate here is over the lack of experiences the majority of the apathetic electorate have had on this issue. I'm not apathetic to this bill, therefore I am not part of this majority that you continually keep referring to.
You were, apparently, quoting other people's experiences, presumably because you could not draw on your own, then criticising the electorate for a lack of experience, which would appear to be your own dilemma.
Omah is offline  
Old 07-02-2013, 01:25 AM #112
Glenn.'s Avatar
Glenn. Glenn. is offline
SIGH
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 23,777


Glenn. Glenn. is offline
SIGH
Glenn.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 23,777


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Omah View Post
The issue, AFAIC, is not that it should be pushed aside but that Cameron has brought gay marriage to the fore on a pretext that was neither in the Conservative Party manifesto nor given to the government as a mandate by the electorate - since well over 40 election promises have already been broken, why has Cameron placed so much emphasis on the success, and publicity, of an issue which concerns almost none of the electorate but which antagonises his own party while satisfying the aims of the opposition?

Its the govt. Since when do they stick to anything they promise?

And you say it concerns almost none of the electorate. I think the LGBT community would disagree with that completely, and to suggest such a thing is absurd.
__________________




Hadn't thought of you in a long time
But you keep sending me funny valentines
And I know you think it comes off vicious
But it's precious, adorable
Like a toy chihuahua barking at me from a tiny purse
That's how much it hurts
How many times has your boyfriend said
"Why are we always talking 'bout her?"


………….
Glenn. is offline  
Old 07-02-2013, 01:27 AM #113
Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Omah View Post
You were, apparently, quoting other people's experiences, presumably because you could not draw on your own, then criticising the electorate for a lack of experience, which would appear to be your own dilemma.
Again, you're missing the point.

You: Quoting opinion polls that are supposed to show the lack of current interest towards this issue by the majority of the electorate.

Me: Explaining how it's likely that they're disinterested because it doesn't directly affect them (that's not to say they disagree with the legislation, they are merely apathetic towards it, at least at the moment) - they're not LGBT (and the majority aren't) and so the chances are that they won't have had much experience with LGBT campaigns. Some will have, but the majority won't, and that is how I would explain their supposed lack of current interest in this bill, and why they regard other issues as more important.

In fact, it's one thing even having this bill passed, but the day that a LGBT issue becomes the main concern of the majority of the British public, over other issues that you have raised, will be even more of a historic moment. That day, as sad as it is, is still quite a way off I believe.
Jack_ is offline  
Old 07-02-2013, 01:28 AM #114
Omah Omah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tralfamadore
Posts: 10,343
Omah Omah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tralfamadore
Posts: 10,343
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_ View Post
Yes, they are. A marginalised section of society's opportunity to bring themselves up to the level of the rest of the country who can already get married is of much greater importance than issues facing the majority of the electorate. Issues that, whilst important, can wait - especially considering this piece of legislation has had just about enough of a wait, thanks.



You're not getting it are you? No opinion poll or statistic is going to change the fact that regardless of your political beliefs, what you consider to be pressing issues facing this country, whether you support same sex marriage or not - this is a long overdue piece of legislation that a minority group have waited decades for and it is essential that it is passed sooner rather than later (as it should have been passed years ago), so that equality prevails, bigotry is given a kicking and we as a society can move on and this no longer has to be an issue.
"You're not getting it are you?"

It may be a "Big Issue" for you, but if you can't see the importance of other issues to the majority of the electorate then that makes you a bigot, too.
Omah is offline  
Old 07-02-2013, 01:47 AM #115
Omah Omah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tralfamadore
Posts: 10,343
Omah Omah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tralfamadore
Posts: 10,343
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack_ View Post
Again, you're missing the point.

You: Quoting opinion polls that are supposed to show the lack of current interest towards this issue by the majority of the electorate.

Me: Explaining how it's likely that they're disinterested because it doesn't directly affect them (that's not to say they disagree with the legislation, they are merely apathetic towards it, at least at the moment) - they're not LGBT (and the majority aren't) and so the chances are that they won't have had much experience with LGBT campaigns. Some will have, but the majority won't, and that is how I would explain their supposed lack of current interest in this bill, and why they regard other issues as more important.

In fact, it's one thing even having this bill passed, but the day that a LGBT issue becomes the main concern of the majority of the British public, over other issues that you have raised, will be even more of a historic moment. That day, as sad as it is, is still quite a way off I believe.
OTOH, Kizzy believes that Cameron has the public backing in support of the issue.

So which is it ?

IMO, "they are merely apathetic towards it", as you say, and as the poll proves.

The bill will now get lost in the House of Lords for a few years and the "Big Issue", having distracted the punters for a few days, will assume its rank in the interests of the electorate (currently 12th, IIRC).
Omah is offline  
Old 07-02-2013, 01:56 AM #116
Omah Omah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tralfamadore
Posts: 10,343
Omah Omah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tralfamadore
Posts: 10,343
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn View Post
And you say it concerns almost none of the electorate. I think the LGBT community would disagree with that completely, and to suggest such a thing is absurd.
No, it isn't ..... it's borne out be facts.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...#axzz2K2j76vX1

Quote:
Marriage rate falls to its lowest level since records began

Marriage has slumped to its lowest level since records were first kept more than 150 years ago, official figures have revealed.

The proportion of couples tying the knot has fallen back into line with its declining long-term trend following a clampdown on sham weddings.

The popularity of marriage has been waning since 1973.

The Office for National Statistics said the long-term fall in the popularity of marriage was continuing, with millions of couples choosing instead to live together and delay having a family. The figures show the number of weddings in England and Wales dropped by more than 28,000, from 273,070 to 244,710.

The fall brought the marriage rate, the number of people marrying compared to the population as a whole, to its lowest level since records were first kept.

The proportion of married people among the adult population is now only a fraction over a half, at 50.3 per cent.

This figure compares with 54 per cent in 1997 and more than two thirds in the 1970s.
Nearly half the electorate aren't bothered about marriage at all and that proportion is set to increase.
Omah is offline  
Old 07-02-2013, 02:01 AM #117
Kizzy's Avatar
Kizzy Kizzy is offline
Likes cars that go boom
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 41,755


Kizzy Kizzy is offline
Likes cars that go boom
Kizzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 41,755


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Omah View Post
OTOH, Kizzy believes that Cameron has the public backing in support of the issue.

So which is it ?

IMO, "they are merely apathetic towards it", as you say, and as the poll proves.

The bill will now get lost in the House of Lords for a few years and the "Big Issue", having distracted the punters for a few days, will assume its rank in the interests of the electorate (currently 12th, IIRC).
Here's what I believe, the public are far more forward thinking in this respect than a few stuffed shirts in the consrvative party on this issue yes....Is it the most pressing thing facing everyone in the UK today? probably not.
__________________
Kizzy is offline  
Old 07-02-2013, 02:01 AM #118
Glenn.'s Avatar
Glenn. Glenn. is offline
SIGH
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 23,777


Glenn. Glenn. is offline
SIGH
Glenn.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 23,777


Default

The thing is Omah, it may not seem to be a 'Big Issue' with you, but it to thousands of others.
__________________




Hadn't thought of you in a long time
But you keep sending me funny valentines
And I know you think it comes off vicious
But it's precious, adorable
Like a toy chihuahua barking at me from a tiny purse
That's how much it hurts
How many times has your boyfriend said
"Why are we always talking 'bout her?"


………….
Glenn. is offline  
Old 07-02-2013, 02:13 AM #119
Omah Omah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tralfamadore
Posts: 10,343
Omah Omah is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Tralfamadore
Posts: 10,343
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glenn View Post
The thing is Omah, it may not seem to be a 'Big Issue' with you, but it to thousands of others.
I understand and am happy to accept that, but I do not accept the view (of another poster) that it eclipses all other issues of interest to the electorate.
Omah is offline  
Old 20-05-2013, 09:14 AM #120
Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Default

Bumping this in time for the debates and subsequent votes today. Starts at 3:30 I believe.
Jack_ is offline  
Old 20-05-2013, 09:17 AM #121
lostalex's Avatar
lostalex lostalex is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: California
Posts: 18,029


lostalex lostalex is offline
Senior Member
lostalex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: California
Posts: 18,029


Default

If France can do it, so can Britain. Don't let us down!
__________________
Don't be afraid to be weak.
lostalex is offline  
Old 20-05-2013, 10:13 AM #122
Vicky. Vicky. is offline
0_o
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 65,900


Vicky. Vicky. is offline
0_o
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 65,900


Default

Why is this down to a MP vote? MPs get to vote on basic human rights now?

If anything, the public should get their say. I trust them more.
Vicky. is offline  
Old 20-05-2013, 11:18 AM #123
arista's Avatar
arista arista is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 190,817
arista arista is offline
Senior Member
arista's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 190,817
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vicky. View Post
Why is this down to a MP vote? MPs get to vote on basic human rights now?

If anything, the public should get their say. I trust them more.

its to to try to Wreck the Gay Vote
arista is offline  
Old 20-05-2013, 11:20 AM #124
Jesus.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Jesus.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by arista View Post
its to to try to Wreck the Gay Vote
Crystal.
 
Old 20-05-2013, 03:35 PM #125
Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Jack_ Jack_ is offline
oh fack off
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: England
Posts: 47,434

Favourites (more):
Survivor 40: Tony
IAC2019: Ian Wright


Default

The debate has started.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/tv/bbc_...ment/watchlive
Jack_ is offline  
Register to reply Log in to reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
equal, marriage, vote


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:34 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2026 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts