[MarkWaldorf]

Originally posted by Hugo
Yeah, like totally.
I mean, people should have a choice, it's like a democracy, right? We need to speak for all the little, less fabulous people who don't get a voice and are deprived of seeing our art. What kind of world do we live in where somebody has to take the energy to move the mouse, and click 'Show full signature'? Its just so tragic.

IFKR.
we're doing the undeveloped world a favour here, james.

[Hugo]

Originally posted by LemonJam

Best. Comeback. Ever.

[MarkWaldorf]

****

[Shaun]

[Tom4784]

Originally posted by LemonJam

Best. Comeback. Ever.

I'd +karma him but i've used it up.

[lily.]

Originally posted by Hugo
Admin. I'm deleting that - James

Nasty

[James]

Re deleted posts... You really need to stop all that. All of you.

Re... the sigs... there is meant to be 300px high limit for banners anyway. The reason for that is so that people don't have to scroll too much through the same banners that they have probably seen many times before. The 'show full sig' thing is already a compromise between a fixed limit and no limit.

Giving people an option for it, yeah maybe, but it is quite a bit of work adding options to profiles and I don't have time at the moment.

MarkWaldorf, I've resized your banner, if you use this link... no 'show full signature'... if you ask me, looks exactly the same.

[andybigbro]

Originally posted by Shaun
I don't care - people with mammoth signatures annoy me anyway.

I agree. I prefer little sigs.. :P

[Nicky.]

Why don't you just make them the correct sizes when you make them to start with?

[Matt08]

Stick within the rules and there won't be a problem. Simple.

[Tom]

Why is it ridiculous? Surely you're the ridiculous one for having a signature thats too big? Anyway it doesn't bother me, I don't even have signatures turned on. If I had my way they'd be banned altogether

[lily.]

The 'Show Full Signature' phenomenon has claimed another victim.

[MarkWaldorf]

People are acting as if I'm asking for it to be removed <_<

[andybigbro]

Originally posted by lili
The 'Show Full Signature' phenomenon has claimed another victim.

Oooh and "lili" are you a fan or not...

[andybigbro]

Originally posted by MarkWaldorf
People are acting as if I'm asking for it to be removed <_<

YOU ARE YOU ARE!

Kidding lol.

[MarkWaldorf]

Originally posted by andybigbro

YOU ARE YOU ARE!

Kidding lol.

MY SIG JUST WANTS ACCEPTANCE

[lily.]

Originally posted by andybigbro

Oooh and "lili" are you a fan or not...

A fan of what Andrew?

[lily.]

Originally posted by MarkWaldorf

MY SIG JUST WANTS ACCEPTANCE

I accept and embrace your sig.

[MarkWaldorf]

ily Linda.

Chace deserves better than this. He's hotter in FULL form.

[lily.]

Indeed. I feel your pain Mark.

[MarkWaldorf]

*makes leaflets for Campaign for Chace cause*

[andybigbro]

Originally posted by lili

A fan of what Andrew?

A fan of the Show Full Signature phenomenon.. :P

[lily.]

I'm a fan of abolishing it when the signature is too sexy.

I think James is more than capable of fashioning some kind of script which can determine the sexiness of the signature.

Clearly if the signature is rank, then it should be hidden at all times, but sexy signatures should always be shown.

Simples.

[andybigbro]

Originally posted by lili
I'm a fan of abolishing it when the signature is too sexy.

I think James is more than capable of fashioning some kind of script which can determine the sexiness of the signature.

Clearly if the signature is rank, then it should be hidden at all times, but sexy signatures should always be shown.

Simples.

Well, in that case Linda.
BOTH YOUR SIG AND MARKS SHOULD BE HIDDEN

*runs* =D

[lily.]

Oh you better run!!!!!!!!!!!!


Mark, fetch the gifs!