[Kate!]

Well ........

In third place with 20 points

Spoiler:

Vanessa and Pothuthic

The winning team with 28 points

Spoiler:

Loukas and Jordan

Spoiler:

And with a respectable 24 points - Drew Jake and Natalie

Breakdown to follow.......

[Pete.]

The deserved winners

[Drew.]

Thanks for the votes

[Mitchell]

Oh

[Benjamin]

Originally Posted by Benjamin

5 points - Jordan/Loukas. I think their design of it and description was good, I feel it would work well on TiBB. The copyright thing is an issue easily fixed by using YT vids instead. Took a while to answer some questions and seemed little perplexed by some. Overall though this would be the one I would invest in for TiBB.


3 points - Just getting these is Drew, Jake and Natalie. I think it is a workable idea on TiBB, just lacking any real enthusiasm or self-input. I feel the answers to the questions were weak and that they played it far too safe. They need to learn to answer questions better too if they make the final or it will be their undoing.


1 point: Vanessa/Pothutic - I love this idea, it different, it;s funny, it just would not work on TiBB. It would be a fad that lasted a few weeks if that before succumbing to the depths of TiBB joining most of the social groups and the blogs as rarely used areas. I did like their pitch however and their question answering, but it comes down to the product, which sadly let them down.

.

[Loukas]

Originally Posted by Benjamin

.

my name is Loukas
With a K and an U and an A

not Lewis with an E and an I and a W

lol

(thanks for the 5 points)

[Vanessa]

I'm here.

[Benjamin]

Originally Posted by Loukas

my name is Loukas
With a K and an U and an A

not Lewis with an E and an I and a W

lol

(thanks for the 5 points)

I posted that before I saw my error earlier, then just copied it from my sent messages.

[T*]

Yay Joukas!

[Jake.]

thanks guys, well done Loukas and Jordan

[Shaun]

lewis such a good candidate that he's getting points 3 days after quitting

[Kate!]

Loukas and Jordan congrats - you progress to the next stage.

Drew, Natalie, Jake, Vanessa and Pothuthic please assemble in the boardroom.

[Jake.]

-assembles-

hope this is quick lol, nice early start for me

[Jordan.]

Ty for believing in our artistic vision investors

[Mitchell]

Good luck

[Kate!]

I will post the next task tonight, after the firing, but you'll have all weekend for it so have a chillout

[Vanessa]

Good luck everyone!

[Pete.]

Originally Posted by Petemitch

5 points - Loukas and Jordan
A clear, well structured pitch with a solid idea and interactivity. They were very good at answering posed questions and criticisms

3 points - Drew, Jake, Natalie
Another excellent idea only topped by the above. Their pitch was a bit wafflely (spelling sorry) and could have easily been broken down into different section, bullet points to attract attention and to further convey their ideas. Also the lack of input in the answering questions section disappointed me and contributed to this average scoring

1 point - Mitchell and Vanessa
A different idea, yes, but not as exciting as the two other ideas. Also, they should have been prepared not to offend people and look for reasons that all people could accept it and enjoy it and not pass it off as a 'joke'. Also, it seemed that only one person was doing to the work while the other person was reaping the benefits with contributed to their low score.

.

[Pete.]

Sorry for being harsh Pot and Van

[Vanessa]

Thanks, Lord Shugrr!

[Vanessa]

Originally Posted by Petemitch

Sorry for being harsh Pot and Van

Thanks for taking things personally. Welcome to my ignore list.

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by Vanessa

Thanks for taking things personally. Welcome to my ignore list.

:orangu:

[Kate!]

Originally Posted by Vanessa

Thanks for taking things personally. Welcome to my ignore list.

Now now

[Vanessa]

No need to take things personally.

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by Vanessa

No need to take things personally.

That's what you're doing now tho