[Crimson Dynamo]

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

What else is Sir Kier meant to do? She was dewhipped pretty darn fast.

[bots]

She and Corbyn are 2 peas in a pod, it's hardly surprising

[arista]

[arista]

[arista]

Starmer is going on "This Morning"
ITV1HD
tomorrow Tuesday 24/4/23 10AM Live

[arista]

Starmer Live ITV1HD

[arista]

After talking about the Jewish Labour Problem.

Onto Evil Rape
he is going to update laws
his own daughter is 12.

[arista]

He claims
on the small boats

He said we have to stop the boats
and will work upstream.

So France, is going to suddenly stop these
Smuggler Criminals for tubby Kier?

[arista]

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by arista

To be fair to him here and I do criticise him a lot.

His record from becoming leader and following the equalities commission investigation findings, is strong and praiseworthy.

I believe he has no intention of tolerating any even small elements of the vile thing which is antisemitism.

I have no idea whether Abbott should be forgiven.
The forgiveness she needs has to be sought from and given by those she offended iF they felt able to.
It's not forgiveness from Starmer that's relevant.

He's acted quickly and rightly, the process is enacted to investigate the issue as laid down by the Equalities commision directive on antisemitism.

Personally, I think Abbott would be better to stand down now.
She has had horrendous racist attacks on herself from people and even media too.
She just doesn't seem to take on board some very serious issues and realise the importance of how wrong they can be.
Her apology while welcome, came only after the issue was publicised and the fallout afterwards.

I've long held the view that there are times, when saying sorry doesn't then make things right.
For me personally , antisemetism from anyone, no matter who they are is an issue where sorry just doesn't put things right,.

On this I fully support Starmer's stance.

I just wish I could really enthusiastically get behind him on other things.
If he was to adopt the policies he says he is open on but they're not right for the next election.
Then Labour would have a really great programme to offer more than the one he appears to be going to offer.

[bots]

Abbot saying it was a first draft error is just taking the piss. She meant to say exactly what she wrote, she believes exactly what she wrote. There was no error and that is why she should be kicked from the party. It's no coincidence that she had a relationship with Corbyn, they both think the same way and they should both suffer the same fate

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

Abbot saying it was a first draft error is just taking the piss. She meant to say exactly what she wrote, she believes exactly what she wrote. There was no error and that is why she should be kicked from the party. It's no coincidence that she had a relationship with Corbyn, they both think the same way and they should both suffer the same fate

I agree with this.

[Liam-]

It’s a shame he isn’t as committed to stamping out all forms of racism members of the party have been subjected to

[arista]

A shorter Tweet has replaced the 3Mins tweet
That page before Longer Tweet was Deleted by ITV

[arista]

[arista]

SkyNews Text:
[Sue Gray held secret talks with Sir Keir Starmer
while working for the team advising the
Commons partygate investigation,
according to The Daily Telegraph.]

[arista]

Sky News Text:
[Labour is at odds with Britons on a
number of "woke cultural issues"]

[The Slim Reaper]

Joey, Joey, where are you?

[arista]

Some reports this morning,
claim Sue Gray will have to wait 2 years
before working for Starmer

This is Stinking.

[arista]

Starmer is on BBC1AM
Salford.

Justifying his Sunak Attack Posters

And saying how Royal he is?

His 2 kids aged 14 and 12
are also Royal fans

[joeysteele]

I'm not pleased with the posters attacking Sunak myself.

However he has sought to lead this discredited Party and government twice, being successful the second time.

For me, attacking the government is fine, plus pointing out Sunak as a weaker leader who isn't really addressing the issues which the attacks are on.
Not to accuse him though of the negatives of those issues.

Attack him for not acting on them fine.
Not personally.

However wait for it, the Cons will be presenting Starmer as the devil incarnate as the elections approach.

This is why a different politics is getting more vital to be explored.
Not all this childish tit for tat nonsense around very serious matters.

[arista]

Originally Posted by joeysteele

I'm not pleased with the posters attacking Sunak myself.

However he has sought to lead this discredited Party and government twice, being successful the second time.

For me, attacking the government is fine, plus pointing out Sunak as a weaker leader who isn't really addressing the issues which the attacks are on.
Not to accuse him though of the negatives of those issues.

Attack him for not acting on them fine.
Not personally.

However wait for it, the Cons will be presenting Starmer as the devil incarnate as the elections approach.

This is why a different politics is getting more vital to be explored.
Not all this childish tit for tat nonsense around very serious matters.

Yes, makes sense what you have stated.

[The Slim Reaper]

[arista]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

Slim Put the DATE
of that
you lazy poster

Because it just says 2023