[Christmas Dynasnow]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

LT's point is quite clear, He doesn't want the stereotypical HM's. He just worded it horrifically really.

if i had time and if this was an essay that counted for an exam i would have done better, granted


but it does help to attract a bit of debate if there are ambiguities..

[lozzalondon]

Originally Posted by Dezzy

LT's point is quite clear, He doesn't want the stereotypical HM's. He just worded it horrifically really.

"No gays, no bi's, no gobshytes, no weirdos"

Irrespective of what he wrote the title is plain worng and offensive!

[Alec]

Originally Posted by lozzalondon

"No gays, no bi's, no gobshytes, no weirdos"

Irrespective of what he wrote the title is plain worng and offensive!

This is what I think.

Would it be ok if the OP put "No disabled people" - or "No black people" ?

[Christmas Dynasnow]

Originally Posted by Alec

This is what I think.

Would it be ok if the OP put "No disabled people" - or "No black people" ?

damn goes tomorrow's thread


thanks a bunch

(and if all the black people were like makosi i would)

[Alec]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

damn goes tomorrow's thread


thanks a bunch

(and if all the black people were like makosi i would)

Sorry to spoil your next offensive thread.

What is up with your post pic as well? [del]A woman[/del] Madonna with a see though top, considering this website is used by 10 year olds...

[Tom4784]

Originally Posted by lozzalondon

"No gays, no bi's, no gobshytes, no weirdos"

Irrespective of what he wrote the title is plain worng and offensive!

True, there are better titles but then again it brought attention to it didn't it? Chances are he had that as the topic title so it'd get noticed.

As for his point, I disagree. As long as they provide entertainment the HM's can act how they like.

[Christmas Dynasnow]

Originally Posted by lozzalondon

"No gays, no bi's, no gobshytes, no weirdos"

Irrespective of what he wrote the title is plain worng and offensive!

It happens to be the quote under the Logo of Richmond Council in SW London.

[WOMBAI]

Originally Posted by lozzalondon

"No gays, no bi's, no gobshytes, no weirdos"

Irrespective of what he wrote the title is plain worng and offensive!

In the end - people will read into it what they want! Maybe some are just over-senstive about it!

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

haha this thread reminds me of when lois ran for mayor on family guy and peter made t shirts lol

vote for lois.
unless your queer.
no wait,
even if your queer.
no jews though.
okay, jews.

[Christmas Dynasnow]

Originally Posted by simonsays

haha this thread reminds me of when lois ran for mayor on family guy and peter made t shirts lol

vote for lois.
unless your queer.
no wait,
even if your queer.
no jews though.
okay, jews.

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

i need to buy that shirt lol

[daniel-lewis-1985]

Big brother's core audience are women and gays therefore these are people we relate to!

Big brother is a personality contest so therefor i want a house full of great personality and unlike you LeatherCrumpet am not pigeon holing people or judging everyone by steriotype.

And my spellin mistakes spoil this post?

Well that dirty ***** in your avatar with her nipples showing and a face full of botox is spoiling this post more

peace out x

[Christmas Dynasnow]

Originally Posted by daniel-lewis-1985

Big brother's core audience are women and gays therefore these are people we relate to!

Big brother is a personality contest so therefor i want a house full of great personality and unlike you LeatherCrumpet am not pigeon holing people or judging everyone by steriotype.

And my spellin mistakes spoil this post?

Well that dirty ***** in your avatar with her nipples showing and a face full of botox is spoiling this forum more

peace out x

Big brother's Kore audience are women and gays

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

haha cant wait for the 'no black or disabled people' thread in fact for fun lets try and think of the most offensive tread title lol

il go first

*I know mikey is blind but surely he knows he looks like a paedophile*

[daniel-lewis-1985]

Personally i think this forum should be for 16+

Its Big Brother a programme where women get their tits out, housemates have sex and use words such as f u ck c u n t s l a g etc lol

Its big bro not the power rangers

[WOMBAI]

Originally Posted by daniel-lewis-1985

Personally i think this forum should be for 16+

Its Big Brother a programme where women get their tits out, housemates have sex and use words such as f u ck c u n t s l a g etc lol

Its big bro not the power rangers

Some have expressed the same - but many current members are below that age - and would obviously be unhappy at being booted out!

[Christmas Dynasnow]

Originally Posted by daniel-lewis-1985

Personally i think this forum should be for 16+

Its Big Brother a programme where women get their tits out, housemates have sex and use words such as f u ck c u n t s l a g etc lol

Its big bro not the power rangers

i agree


a minimum IQ level should be set

[Kore]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

i agree


a minimum IQ level should be set

dont shoot yourself in the foot Leath...lol

[Alec]

Originally Posted by daniel-lewis-1985

Personally i think this forum should be for 16+

Its Big Brother a programme where women get their tits out, housemates have sex and use words such as f u ck c u n t s l a g etc lol

Its big bro not the power rangers

Yea I do agree with that, however we all know that just because a film has "18" on it, that some 8 year old will inevitably watch it.

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

i think it should be 18+ and you have to post a picture of your pubic hair to prove you are over 18