| FAQ |
| Members List |
| Calendar |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
| Chat and Games Looking for forum games, and completely off topic banter - this is your place! (includes Virtual Big Brother type forum games) |
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
|
#1 | |||
|
||||
|
Flag shagger.
|
Quote:
I think it makes the mods job harder as the rules are quite wordy, one seems to cancel out another, they're mostly up for conjecture and there's no appeal anymore. The rules could be edited down to a set of bullet points really. I think if there was a review - not by mods or members, by admin - and a proper system of appeal was set, it would make the mods' job clearer, there'd be fewer arguments over warnings and infractions and less abuse of the appeals system. Just my personal opinion of course... |
|||
|
|
|
|
#2 | ||
|
|||
|
0_o
|
Quote:
Appeals was absolutely perfect (the appeals section was actually my idea to begin with) to begin with, until people started going there for EVERY little thing. I think it would probably have been better to just ban certain users from the section than remove it totally, but even doing that would have caused world war 3
|
||
|
|
|
|
#3 | ||
|
|||
|
User banned
|
Yes, some mods have broken many rules & enjoy winding up members
|
||
|
|
|
|
#4 | |||
|
||||
|
Viewer Emeritus
|
There is a a very real problem with interpretation of rules and with personal prejudices on this Forum and it really should be clarified by the Administration even if it means posting clear and unequivocal RULES of conduct and punishments for breaches thereof.
__________________
ad nauseam - ad infinitum!
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#5 | |||
|
||||
|
Z
|
Yeah the infraction system leaves a lot of margin for different interpretations, it's not necessarily flawed, it's just... difficult to make it more comprehensive
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#6 | |||
|
||||
|
Flag shagger.
|
I think - again , just my own opinion - the appeals process should be reinstated and run like this: one plea of mitigation, with a word limit, to be considered by admin. No other dialogue to be entered into, Admin's decision is final... and your ban/infraction can be increased or decreased.
Your home may be repossessed if you do not keep up repayments, terms and conditions apply. Okay, not the last bit. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#7 | |||
|
||||
|
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#8 | |||
|
||||
|
Flag shagger.
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#9 | |||
|
||||
|
Quand il pleut, il pleut
|
..just a little ..('special' exceptions will apply..)..should do it I think...
__________________
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#10 | |||
|
||||
|
Flag shagger.
|
Quote:
No dots allowed in appeals either.............................. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#11 | |||
|
||||
|
I Love Niamh’s Brick
|
Tbh, the last time the rules were updated were when I did them last and that was probably a good couple years back. They could probably do with a review/update soon just so everybody can reread them and so that everybody mods,admin and members are all on the same page.
__________________
It's never too late to be who you once could have been... Spoiler: |
|||
|
|
|
|
#12 | |||
|
||||
|
Viewer Emeritus
|
Just print the rules and penalties and STICK to them.
__________________
ad nauseam - ad infinitum!
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#13 | |||
|
||||
|
I Love Niamh’s Brick
|
I also would like to see things more consistent. Sorry to bring up my infraction from the other day but I got infracted straightaway, not even a warning, despite the fact the member I was referring to was okay with it and the fact I have never had anything other than an infraction that I did deserve for being rude intentionally. I didn;t even know who to query over that as it seemed no mods/admin were online at the time (because I imagine they were appearing offline, something that I don;t think mods should do)
I know mods hating hearing this, but not being one anymore it does sometimes come across very inconsistent depending on who handles it.
__________________
It's never too late to be who you once could have been... Spoiler: Last edited by Benjamin; 04-01-2014 at 10:03 PM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
#14 | ||
|
|||
|
0_o
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
#15 | |||
|
||||
|
Lee.
|
Just condense all the rules into one...
1. Don't act like dicks
__________________
![]() |
|||
|
|
|
|
#16 | |||
|
||||
|
I Love Niamh’s Brick
|
Oh Lee, you;d be infracted all the time.
__________________
It's never too late to be who you once could have been... Spoiler: |
|||
|
|
|
|
#17 | |||
|
||||
|
Lee.
|
this is probably true!
__________________
![]() |
|||
|
|
|
|
#18 | |||
|
||||
|
Z
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#19 | |||
|
||||
|
Lee.
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() |
|||
|
|
|
|
#20 | |||
|
||||
|
Z
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#21 | |||
|
||||
|
I Love Niamh’s Brick
|
God, I think the only person left on the forum would be Arista if that was the rule
__________________
It's never too late to be who you once could have been... Spoiler: |
|||
|
|
|
|
#23 | |||
|
||||
|
Flag shagger.
|
|
|||
|
|
|
|
#24 | |||
|
||||
|
Viewer Emeritus
|
"Institution" was simply terminology, geeze!
__________________
ad nauseam - ad infinitum!
|
|||
|
|
| Register to reply Log in to reply |
|
|