[Cal.]

I really don’t think so!

Ugh...her mind.

[montblanc]

me obvs!

[Cal.]

Originally Posted by montblanc

me obvs!

Don’t be so STUPID!

[RileyH]

Originally Posted by Cal.

Don’t be so STUPID!

oop

[montblanc]

Originally Posted by Cal.

Don’t be so STUPID!

[Denver]

Atleast 74

[Daniel-X]

Originally Posted by Adam.

Atleast 74

Name 1? Fatty.

[Denver]

Originally Posted by Daniel-X

Name 1? Fatty.

Brillopad

[Daniel-X]

All this... for me?

[Greg!]

Annabelindabee just pips ha at the post as she is literally God

[Withano]

I am better so nyehh

[Jake.]

Rude

[Marsh.]

Danielle didn't win Most Loved did she?

[Black Dagger]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

Danielle didn't win Most Loved did she?

So you blew a lot of people. BIG DEAL

[user104658]

Apparently Marsh but that does seem sort of unrealistic?

[Crimson Dynamo]

Michael21 for one

I think I will make a thread about him...

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

Michael21 for one

I think I will make a thread about him...

[Kazanne]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

Michael21 for one

I think I will make a thread about him...

And people wonder why some people react like they do ,here it is for all to see.

[bots]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

Michael21 for one

I think I will make a thread about him...

more tea vicar?

[Calderyon]

Depends on how you measure it. For you personally no, to others very likely yes.

[Vicky.]

There is a difference between a thread that was asking if michael 21 is fake or not, and a thread saying he is a good member,

Feel free to make a positive thread about michael21

I know kirk did not mean the thread in a negative way, but it would clearly go that way with the Op asking if people thought M21 was fake or not. And the reason it was deleted was that, along with...if someone made a thread asking if (for example) brillopad was fake or not...it would be reported and there would be hell on if it was not removed. And if not reported straight away, then once people said 'yes I think so' it would be reported.

Actually, there were reports from inside that M21 thread about people answering 'yes he is fake' or whatever. But the actual thread was not reported itself, but people were reported for ANSWERING the OP. So quite how a thread could remain, when if people answered the question one way there were reports, I don't know?

I seem to be writing essays today, but yeah, if you want to make a thread to actually say M21 is a great member, knock yourself out.

[kirklancaster]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

There is a difference between a thread that was asking if Michael 21 is fake or not, and a thread saying he is a good member,

Feel free to make a positive thread about michael21

I know kirk did not mean the thread in a negative way, but it would clearly go that way with the Op asking if people thought M21 was fake or not. And the reason it was deleted was that, along with...if someone made a thread asking if (for example) brillopad was fake or not...it would be reported and there would be hell on if it was not removed. And if not reported straight away, then once people said 'yes I think so' it would be reported.

Actually, there were reports from inside that M21 thread about people answering 'yes he is fake' or whatever. But the actual thread was not reported itself, but people were reported for ANSWERING the OP. So quite how a thread could remain, when if people answered the question one way there were reports, I don't know?

I seem to be writing essays today, but yeah, if you want to make a thread to actually say M21 is a great member, knock yourself out.

Michael 21 sent me a friends request after I made that good-natured tongue-in-cheek friendly thread but whatever, Vicky.

My question is; did I deserve Infracting for it?

Why not just a friendly pm advising me just why such a thread wasn't such a good idea?

I have had 3 Infractions in a week and all of them are pure B.S. - In my opinion.

[Vicky.]

Originally Posted by kirklancaster

Michael 21 sent me a friends request after I made that good-natured tongue-in-cheek friendly thread but whatever, Vicky.

My question is; did I deserve Infracting for it?

Why not just a friendly pm advising me just why such a thread wasn't such a good idea?

I have had 3 Infractions in a week and all of them are pure B.S. - In my opinion.

Kirk I specifically said (twice I think but not reading back, but it does actually say in the post you quoted) that I know you did not mean it in a bad way. However it was inviting negative posts about micahel and there were reports from the thread too which showed us the way the thread would end up.

I would not have infracted you for that, no. I would have sent a PM or maybe a warning. But I would have deleted the thread for sure.

Edit. I agree with the other infractions though, just checked them.

[jet]

Well, threads asking is there a better forum member than Daniel X could also invite negativity like 'of course there is, he/she is a s*** member, what are you on about' (not that I know anything about Daniel at all so that is no reflection on that poster)...
So were the posters who made negative remarks about Michael infracted ...and why was Kirk infracted when it is said it is understood his thread wasn't meant in a bad way? If you wouldn't have infracted him Vicky, then why WAS he infracted? It all sounds dodgy to me.
This forum is a minefield of confusion about what is and isn't allowed and tolerated depending on the mod online at the time, it's currently an uncomfortable place to navigate re the rules which treat us a bit like like children and feels stifling to post on when one mod will do one thing and another do something else - which is why I don't bother anymore and many long time posters are losing their love for this place.

[Josy]

Originally Posted by jet

Well, threads asking is there a better forum member than Daniel X could also invite negativity like 'of course there is, he/she is a s*** member, what are you on about' (not that I know anything about Daniel at all so that is no reflection on that poster)...
So were the posters who made negative remarks about Michael infracted ...and why was Kirk infracted when it is said it is understood his thread wasn't meant in a bad way? If you wouldn't have infracted him Vicky, then why WAS he infracted? It all sounds dodgy to me.
This forum is a minefield of confusion about what is and isn't allowed and tolerated depending on the mod online at the time, it's currently an uncomfortable place to navigate re the rules which treat us a bit like like children and feels stifling to post on when one mod will do one thing and another do something else - which is why I don't bother anymore and many long time posters are losing their love for this place.

I'm getting really sick of this and this isn't just aimed at you jet this is just the post I chose to quote, its aimed members that are continually entering threads lately in a pack manner and CONSTANTLY picking at other members and/or questioning forum staff in threads, I may not be posting much but i've been seeing this far too much lately and it stops now!

Other members infractions bans etc ARE NO ONE ELSES BUSINESS, this also means you dont post in threads asking for them to be explained, attempting to kick up drama due to staff actions, blatantly bait other forum members, abuse the report system by using to both report and insult members you have a problem with at the same time... I could go on n on.

IF you have a genuine query about any staff actions that relates to you personally then contact a mod or admin and IF we think its something that needs discussed further we will reply.

I wont be posting any more warnings about this sort of behaviour so just a heads up right now that heavy infractions will be given out if this continues from here on in.