[Calderyon]

Nah, there are enough now.

No need for a new one.

[Kizzy]

Only one vote?... Well I wouldn't mod for you unappreciative muggles anyway!

[joeysteele]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Only one vote?... Well I wouldn't mod for you unappreciative muggles anyway!

I think you're a bit like me Kizzy.
You'd hate the thought even of being one.

Despite my own moans, they do their best I guess.
However I'd hate to be one myself.

It does seem a rather unappreciated and thankless position to be in.

Personally I'd also like Jack_ or Mock.
They could be very interesting mods indeed in my view.

[Mitchell]

Originally Posted by Kizzy

Only one vote?... Well I wouldn't mod for you unappreciative muggles anyway!

This is exactly why i didn’t vote for Ammi and yourself (and Tony), because I genuinely didn’t think you’d want it haha

[Nicky91]

voted for who i trust to be a non-biased mod

but current modding team is fine (wish Vicky would be more active though, kinda miss her)

[thesheriff443]

Out of the list I’d do Anniek

[thesheriff443]

Mods and admin would get more appreciation if they were not members.

There will always be questions asked.

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

Out of the list I’d do Anniek

I'm sure she'd be honoured.

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

Mods and admin would get more appreciation if they were not members.

There will always be questions asked.

I agree that a forum without Niamh posting would be at least 150% better, but this is a little extreme on a big brother forum with 5 people posting.

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

I'm sure she'd be honoured.




I agree that a forum without Niamh posting would be at least 150% better, but this is a little extreme on a big brother forum with 5 people posting.

It’s not about individuals it’s the forum as a whole.

I think the most disturbing thing on this is that private messages are not private and in a age of data protection this is not only a moral issue but an unlawful one.

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

It’s not about individuals it’s the forum as a whole.

I think the most disturbing thing on this is that private messages are not private and in a age of data protection this is not only a moral issue but an unlawful one.

PM's are private, so no idea what you're on about. Trust me, no one wants to hack in and see you and scott sharing dick and feet pics.

[Nicky91]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

PM's are private, so no idea what you're on about. Trust me, no one wants to hack in and see you and scott sharing dick and feet pics.

too much information

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by The Slim Reaper

PM's are private, so no idea what you're on about. Trust me, no one wants to hack in and see you and scott sharing dick and feet pics.

Well clearly you don’t know what’s been going on, James admitted on here he read members private messages.

And why would I would to share dick pics with Scott when you would be the obvious choice.

[Nicky91]

i would not put myself forward for a mod position since i do not trust myself with that sort of power

also i do not want anyone to get banned like ever, wish everyone could just get along in a friendly way with each other, who cares if someone has different opinions, views than yours

a friendly forum is a more inviting forum which could draw some old members back on here, or be inviting to more new members


that is what i dream of, for this place to be very crowded, alive again (good to have dreams i guess)

a more crowded forum is more fun for our games too, instead of having same people in games over and over again

[Cal.]

I’m no longer pursuing this as I’m very busy.

[Fetch The Bolt Cutters]

[Amy Jade]

Oops if James can see me slagging him off in PMs

[Shaun]

I'd have thought it were obvious that a prerequisite of running a message board is a potential power to intervene when serious circumstances arise (for example, if members started conspiring to threaten/literally kill another member, it'd need to be proven for criminal prosecution)

It's been pretty common knowledge that everything you PM can be reported by the recipient... who did you think would read the reports?

[Crimson Dynamo]

If you look at the rules page

at the bottom there is a secret contact admin link

Id imagine that is the one to use if ( and i know this rarely happens) you wish to discuss an infraction?

[Marsh.]

Marsh
Amy Jade, Cherie, LeatherTrumpet, Saph

Oh wow, we love taste.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Well i pmd Parmy asking if i could borrow his gimp suit and Valerie SIngleton special edition fleshlight and the next day i had Josy messaging me offering up her Lesley Judd Cosplay outfit plus her homemade lube/hand sanitiser?

[Dogeatdog]

Me waiting for my first vote...

[Marsh.]

This PM stuff is laughable. If you're choosing to share personal information via a Big Brother message board then give your head a wobble. James is hardly hacking your personal emails.

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

This PM stuff is laughable. If you're choosing to share personal information via a Big Brother message board then give your head a wobble. James is hardly hacking your personal emails.

[DouglasS]

Originally Posted by Marsh.

This PM stuff is laughable. If you're choosing to share personal information via a Big Brother message board then give your head a wobble. James is hardly hacking your personal emails.

Some people have made genuine friends here, they may wish you share personal infomation with those people. They may also wish to discuss personal matters over PM with the trust that those PMs cannot be read by others (as personal infomation). I don’t think that makes people crazy...

[The Slim Reaper]

Originally Posted by DouglasS

Some people have made genuine friends here, they may wish you share personal infomation with those people. They may also wish to discuss personal matters over PM with the trust that those PMs cannot be read by others (as personal infomation). I don’t think that makes people crazy...

James isn't going into anyones pm's to see what someones facebook address is. Folks should be bothered by the act that required it, not the investigation.