[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by arista

Sure
but now they are Money Making Ex Royals.


Feel The Force

Earning their own coin instead of handouts from taxpayers

[Livia]

Selling gossip about your own family and imagining people see them as the wounded party. Deluded.

[Glenn.]

Meghans “family” did the same and they’re the wounded party

[Crimson Dynamo]

[Crimson Dynamo]

[hijaxers]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Meghans “family” did the same and they’re the wounded party

Well we'll soon see what they have to say when their Netflix programme airs.

[arista]

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by hijaxers

Well we'll soon see what they have to say when their Netflix programme airs.

Are they doing one?

[jet]

Guy Adams and Richard Kay "Talk about recollections may vary"

Shop’s newspapers that weren’t on sale

During a visit to London in November 2016, weeks after she was revealed to be dating Harry, Meghan walked from Kensington Palace to the nearby branch of Whole Foods, an organic supermarket.
The prince says she queued at the check-outs. ‘Before her were rows and rows of magazines and newspapers, and on all of them, under the most shocking and disgusting headlines . . . was her. The other customers noticed as well. They looked at the magazines, looked at her, and now they too pulled out their phones, like zombies. Meg caught two cashiers sharing a horrible smile.’
All very dramatic and, if true, frightening. In fact, only one shopper recognised her — a journalist.
As for the headlines, on the day in question, November 10, Meghan did not feature on a single front page. Even if she had she wouldn’t have seen them at Whole Foods, because they don’t sell newspapers. And the only magazines it stocks are specialist lifestyle publications.
...........
That was the day Harry wrote that he came home to find Meghan sobbing and shaking and inconsolable...

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by jet

Guy Adams and Richard Kay "Talk about recollections may vary"

Shop’s newspapers that weren’t on sale

During a visit to London in November 2016, weeks after she was revealed to be dating Harry, Meghan walked from Kensington Palace to the nearby branch of Whole Foods, an organic supermarket.
The prince says she queued at the check-outs. ‘Before her were rows and rows of magazines and newspapers, and on all of them, under the most shocking and disgusting headlines . . . was her. The other customers noticed as well. They looked at the magazines, looked at her, and now they too pulled out their phones, like zombies. Meg caught two cashiers sharing a horrible smile.’
All very dramatic and, if true, frightening. In fact, only one shopper recognised her — a journalist.
As for the headlines, on the day in question, November 10, Meghan did not feature on a single front page. Even if she had she wouldn’t have seen them at Whole Foods, because they don’t sell newspapers. And the only magazines it stocks are specialist lifestyle publications.
...........
That was the day Harry wrote that he came home to find Meghan sobbing and shaking and inconsolable...

.....you couldnt make it up...oh no hold on a minute...Harry did

[AnnieK]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

William is totally punching

[jet]

Guy Adams and Richard Kay "Talk about recollections may vary"

Art A-level ‘cheat’ scandal

A year after leaving Eton, Harry was accused by an art teacher of cheating in A-level coursework. ‘Broken-hearted, I wanted to release a statement, hold a press conference, tell the world: I did the work! I didn’t cheat,’ he writes. The cold-hearted Palace wouldn’t let him, he alleges. ‘In this, as in most things, the Palace stuck fast to the family motto: never complain, never explain. Especially if the complainer was an 18-year-old boy.’

All very scandalous. But also untrue: the Royal Family did release a statement, which strenuously denied the claims.
It was circulated by Clarence House on the day the story broke in October 2004 and begins: ‘It is not true that Harry cheated in his exam.’ It roundly dismissed what it called ‘unfounded allegations by a teacher in the context of a dispute with the school.’
Eton also described the claims as ‘untrue’ and ‘absurd’.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by jet

Guy Adams and Richard Kay "Talk about recollections may vary"

Art A-level ‘cheat’ scandal

A year after leaving Eton, Harry was accused by an art teacher of cheating in A-level coursework. ‘Broken-hearted, I wanted to release a statement, hold a press conference, tell the world: I did the work! I didn’t cheat,’ he writes. The cold-hearted Palace wouldn’t let him, he alleges. ‘In this, as in most things, the Palace stuck fast to the family motto: never complain, never explain. Especially if the complainer was an 18-year-old boy.’

All very scandalous. But also untrue: the Royal Family did release a statement, which strenuously denied the claims.
It was circulated by Clarence House on the day the story broke in October 2004 and begins: ‘It is not true that Harry cheated in his exam.’ It roundly dismissed what it called ‘unfounded allegations by a teacher in the context of a dispute with the school.’
Eton also described the claims as ‘untrue’ and ‘absurd’.

It seems that a few of the situations Harry says the palace did not support him and he and Meghan are being proved to be completely untrue…

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by AnnieK

William is totally punching

He’s not called big Willy for nothing anniek

[Cherie]

Spare needs to be recategorised ASAP to a work of fiction

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by jet

Guy Adams and Richard Kay "Talk about recollections may vary"

Art A-level ‘cheat’ scandal

A year after leaving Eton, Harry was accused by an art teacher of cheating in A-level coursework. ‘Broken-hearted, I wanted to release a statement, hold a press conference, tell the world: I did the work! I didn’t cheat,’ he writes. The cold-hearted Palace wouldn’t let him, he alleges. ‘In this, as in most things, the Palace stuck fast to the family motto: never complain, never explain. Especially if the complainer was an 18-year-old boy.’

All very scandalous. But also untrue: the Royal Family did release a statement, which strenuously denied the claims.
It was circulated by Clarence House on the day the story broke in October 2004 and begins: ‘It is not true that Harry cheated in his exam.’ It roundly dismissed what it called ‘unfounded allegations by a teacher in the context of a dispute with the school.’
Eton also described the claims as ‘untrue’ and ‘absurd’.

I mean a simple google shows this as a pack of lies I think I remember this as well

Royal Family denies Harry cheated
Prince Harry
Prince Harry got a B for his art A-level
The Royal Family has denied a claim that Prince Harry cheated in his art A-level.
The allegation is said to have been made by a former teacher at Eton who is taking the college to an industrial tribunal claiming unfair dismissal.

Sarah Forsyth reportedly said a senior master told her to help the prince answer questions enabling him to achieve a B grade.

Clarence House said an investigation by an examination board had concluded there had been no cheating.

Ms Forsyth will make her allegations when she appears at the tribunal on Monday, the News of the World said.

The newspaper reported that the former teacher claims she was asked to assist Prince Harry to compile his AS-level art coursework journal. The marks from this discipline counted towards his final A-level grade.

The private school's board has denied the allegations.

'Unsubstantiated'

Teachers sent the prince's 2002 exam paper to be double-checked anonymously by the exam board, but no irregularities were discovered.

The board, Edexcel, said in a statement that it did not comment on individuals but could confirm that in 2003 Eton contacted it about an allegation of cheating against a candidate.

"All such complaints are treated very seriously and always thoroughly investigated by experienced personnel," the board said.

"In this particular instance there was no evidence to support the claim. It was found to be unsubstantiated and the file closed."

The 20-year-old royal, whose other A-level pass was a D in geography, needed reasonable grades in order to help him qualify for Sandhurst military academy, where he will begin his army career in January.

The minimum Sandhurst entrance requirement is two A-levels and it is understood Prince Harry's military career could be at stake if one of his passes was shown to have been obtained by cheating.

A statement released by Clarence House dismissed the allegation as "unfounded".

"A full investigation into these allegations was held by the relevant exam board which found no evidence to support the claims."

Ms Forsyth is thought to have been turned down for a staff position at the school after three years on probation, before being offered a £10,000 pay-off.

Prince Harry, who is third in line to the throne, passed his Sandhurst entrance exams in September.

The Regular Commissions Board four-day test included obstacle courses, medicals and planning exercise.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/3730684.stm

[jet]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Spare needs to be recategorised ASAP to a work of fiction

It seriously does. There is so much being exposed as made up rubbish.

Guy Adams and Richard Kay “Talk about recollections may vary”

Army ‘bunking off’ claim

Fast-forward to December 2004, and a knee injury saw Harry’s entry into the Army postponed. In Spare, he claims newspapers quickly ‘began pushing a story that I was afraid to go into the Army, that I was bunking off, using a fake knee injury as a way of stalling. I was, they said, a coward’.

Quite the claim. But is it true? The Mail is unable to find a single newspaper article covering the affair which contained the words ‘fake’, or ‘bunking off’ or ‘coward’. Neither can we find any piece which claimed he was afraid to enlist.

Harry later claims a hostile media reaction to the Army’s decision, in May 2007, to cancel plans to send him to Iraq. ‘The following week,’ Spare claims, newspapers ‘reported that the abrupt about-face in my deployment had been my own doing. The coward story again’.
In fact, newspapers universally described the prince as being ‘angry’ and ‘devastated’ to be missing out, with the Mail calling him a ‘courageous young man badly let down by his superiors’.

[Swan]

His memory and detail for all this is far too good to be true.

[jet]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

.....you couldnt make it up...oh no hold on a minute...Harry did

[hijaxers]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Are they doing one?

Yes they said they are sick of her lies and they have their own truth, so i can't wait for that one !

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by Livia

Selling gossip about your own family and imagining people see them as the wounded party. Deluded.

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Meghans “family” did the same and they’re the wounded party

Can see this has been ignored

[Beso]

Originally Posted by jet

It seriously does. There is so much being exposed as made up rubbish.

Guy Adams and Richard Kay “Talk about recollections may vary”

Army ‘bunking off’ claim

Fast-forward to December 2004, and a knee injury saw Harry’s entry into the Army postponed. In Spare, he claims newspapers quickly ‘began pushing a story that I was afraid to go into the Army, that I was bunking off, using a fake knee injury as a way of stalling. I was, they said, a coward’.

Quite the claim. But is it true? The Mail is unable to find a single newspaper article covering the affair which contained the words ‘fake’, or ‘bunking off’ or ‘coward’. Neither can we find any piece which claimed he was afraid to enlist.

Harry later claims a hostile media reaction to the Army’s decision, in May 2007, to cancel plans to send him to Iraq. ‘The following week,’ Spare claims, newspapers ‘reported that the abrupt about-face in my deployment had been my own doing. The coward story again’.
In fact, newspapers universally described the prince as being ‘angry’ and ‘devastated’ to be missing out, with the Mail calling him a ‘courageous young man badly let down by his superiors’.

That would explain why he wanted to jump from pilot to gunner pilot to get a kill total.


Hopefully it wasnt civilians. I guess only the saved video evidence of the knight mounting the prawn would prove whatever

[arista]

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by arista

Just leave them where they are ...who cares

[rusticgal]

Of course the big difference is Meghans father was thrown into the spotlight…not used to having any sort of media attention…I don’t think he knew where to turn. I also think that Meghan was embarrassed of her own father…who would she rather walk her down the aisle watched by millions…the future King of England or her rather scruffy unkempt looking father. She’s a massive snob…image means so much to her…her family were not befitting her image…so she invited those that would…Hollywood elite at its best…most of whom she had never even met before. The only person she had there was her mother who ‘projected a bit of class’.
Despite everything she dropped her father at the drop of a hat…his selling of a story is NOTHING compared to what they have done.
Everything Harry and Meghan have done…they have never had a thought for anyone but themselves…it’s all about them and they will walk over everyone including their families for money and exposure. Meghan thinks she is so special that playing second fiddle to Kate was never going to be an option….