[Liam-]

[arista]

Yes get her in a Live CNN HD
debate with Trump.


And an Audience

[Crimson Dynamo]

Elizabeth Warren confirms that Kamala Harris will grant citizenship TO ALL THE
million OF illegals she let in as Border Czar:

“She will work with Congress to get that done.”

Kamala is a Marxist who wants all of America to follow California’s disastrous
path.


CHILLING VIDEO HERE: https://x.com/charliekirk11/status/1817582179691716891

[Barry.]

I’m shocked LT lets Trump get away with being a rapist and felon but calls Harris a terrible candidate. It makes no sense

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by Barry.

I’m shocked LT lets Trump get away with being a rapist and felon but calls Harris a terrible candidate. It makes no sense

He’s the most disingenuous member on here

[Barry.]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

He’s the most disingenuous member on here

I see he ignores the truth to go into his false stories too

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by Barry.

I see he ignores the truth to go into his false stories too

Yep.

Glad to see other people finally clocking it

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Barry.

I’m shocked LT lets Trump get away with being a rapist and felon but calls Harris a terrible candidate. It makes no sense

It makes nothing but sense; LT's threads have been oozing misogyny since [a certain time when a certain thing changed but mods don't like us to talk about that and suddenly become very active].

[Alf]

Originally Posted by Barry.

I’m shocked LT lets Trump get away with being a rapist and felon but calls Harris a terrible candidate. It makes no sense

This guy was also one time seen as a rapist and a felon. Whilst Jimmy Saville was living a life of luxury and seen has a great man.

There's a lesson there somewhere for you.

Youtube video

[Barry.]

Originally Posted by Alf

This guy was also one time seen as a rapist and a felon. Whilst Jimmy Saville was living a life of luxury and seen has a great man.

There's a lesson there somewhere for you.

Youtube video

Doesn’t mean trump is innocent. What’s your point?

[Alf]

Originally Posted by Barry.

Doesn’t mean trump is innocent. What’s your point?

I say he is innocent. That's my point.

I was taught the story of the boy who cried wolf. And they've cried wolf that many times against Trump that I don't believe them.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by Alf

I say he is innocent. That's my point.

I was taught the story of the boy who cried wolf. And they've cried wolf that many times against Trump that I don't believe them.

Nah I reckon pretty much everything said about Trump has been true, just without enough evidence to stick. In my opinion, of course.

[Crimson Dynamo]

Youtube video

[GiRTh]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

Youtube video

Interesting but silly video.

Look a few posts above and you will see that Trump help gut a good bill that would have been positive for the border.

Is the MSM lying? Probably, does it matter when Trump blocks perfectly good bills?

There's gaslighting and then there's what you're doing.

[Maru]

I think we should play a game, when the news is slow or just not interesting enough, where we find some way to connect the current thread or article to Meghan Markle.

In all seriousness, she's a social media expert. That just means she's into social engineering and has designed her image to act like a mind virus. So it really shouldn't be difficult to find some way to twist anything mundane into a for/against situation and connect her with even seemingly "out there" narratives. Other social media-styled celebrity personalities are designed the same and their images are hyper-fixated and fine-tuned to get get the max amount of people to argue/post about them either favorably or unfavorably. The more divided, the better, so it's all a trap to get people angry about about them (favorably or not) and posting regularly. Even the people who "slate" them online, they're fully in on the grift. It's not an accident her name got drug up here again. One can easily blame racism or whatever, but it's far more sinister than that. The racial eliminate is just a way to manipulate the audiences into clashing. Though I agree there's "similarities", if we are only were looking at their crafted image and their participation in the same craftiness behind said images (Kamala particularly, but she's a politician by trade)... Anyway, it's intentional that both are as opaque as possible so as to not reveal what we can't see behind the mask. Instead, we see a veneer designed to be as superficial as feasible, and that superficiality is tweaked to get as many people pissed off as possible... and makes it easier to gaslight others when they just want to talk policy. "You just have a bias because XYZ!". Consider if this if your own reaction to discussions around certain figures whether It's 100% intended that this will be a never ending culture war. No resolution, just argue about pretty faces and keep the media busy writing endless tabloid fodder about all of them... and thus people will vote for them for the symbolic purpose of fueling a lust for goading the other side edit: whether with views, impressions, cash, actual votes, etc...

[Liam-]

Donald Trump owns any problems at the border

[bots]

The AI models only cover the time period up to the point they were created. If you ask it, what is the weather today in your location, its not able to give a response. Your example is no different to that

[Crimson Dynamo]

[GiRTh]

Originally Posted by jet

Different people are named for each likeness. What ONE individual with all of those traits could replace Meghan in the article? I personally can’t think of any.
Apart from that:
Kamala is running for President, Meghan has apparently expressed a desire to one day run for President (haha), or at least become seriously involved in US politics.
They have expressed support for each other more than once in the past.

But no, the one and only link is their skin colour. Really? Why does the mind zoom in on race?

Taylor Swift applies to almost all of these.

Someone like Elizabeth Warren or Klobuchar have both been elected to a house, run for president, been considered a VP pick now these are actual things in common. Not word salad, awkward laughs and social media presences. Those apply to dozens of people.

its incredible that you dont see the point I'm making and want to make comments about a mind that 'zooms in on race'. Do you honestly think that VP Harris has more in common with Meghan than say Klobuchar then, if so, I cant help you and you can discuss this with yourself.

There are dozens of people who court chat shows and laugh awkwardly and use social media and chat word salad etc. All of them. Why pick Meghan? Their race is almost literally the only thing they have in common.

[user104658]

Originally Posted by GiRTh

Taylor Swift applies to almost all of these.

Someone like Elizabeth Warren or Klobuchar have both been elected to a house, run for president, been considered a VP pick now these are actual things in common. Not word salad, awkward laughs and social media presences. Those apply to dozens of people.

its incredible that you dont see the point I'm making and want to make comments about a mind that 'zooms in on race'. Do you honestly think that VP Harris has more in common with Meghan than say Klobuchar then, if so, I cant help you and you can discuss this with yourself.

There are dozens of people who court chat shows and laugh awkwardly and use social media and chat word salad etc. All of them. Why pick Meghan? Their race is almost literally the only thing they have in common.

"Why pick Meghan" as a question for Jet is really moot I suspect; there's more similarity between her and Meghan than there is between her and Harry. If there's no opportunity to turn a thread into one about Harry & Meghan, he simply won't post in it.

[jet]

Originally Posted by Soldier Boy

If there's no opportunity to turn a thread into one about Harry & Meghan, he simply won't post in it.

Not true.

I didn’t post the article, I simply gave an opinion on it. How very dare I.

I am pretty sure I only post in threads turned into H or M ones if they have already been mentioned.

I post in existing H&M threads, I don’t create them.

I post in threads not about H&M. You’d think with all the free time you have to post, you could at least try to be accurate instead of trolling by spouting lies.

[bots]

Youtube video

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

Youtube video

…the prosecutor or the criminal…/America or Trump…pretty strong/blunt stuff there from Ms Kamala camp…

[bots]

Originally Posted by Ammi

…the prosecutor or the criminal…/America or Trump…pretty strong/blunt stuff there from Ms Kamala camp…

it's produced by the Lincoln Project, which is a group of republicans determined that Trump shouldn't be elected

[Ammi]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

it's produced by the Lincoln Project, which is a group of republicans determined that Trump shouldn't be elected

…oh yeah, I’m familiar with the Lincoln project and how they produced similar vids for Biden as well …and he became President …to be continued, then…?…