[Cal.]

I'm not gonna be

[Maxxie.]

I'd say the only two celebrity deaths I felt REALLY affected by were MJ and him, probably because I subconsiously saw them both coming and also as I really looked up to David as a person and I'm not sure if there's anyone (famous) who I more respected their character! RIP, still missed as always < 3

[Ross.]

Why were Marsh and MB arguing in this thread

[Marsh.]

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by MB.

If you want to settle on nobody being able to do one and criticise the other without being a hypocrite, which has got a grain of truth to it, then we'll do that? But it's not worth an argument over?

The only one starting an argument is you.

People made their thoughts known by posting in the thread. Then I posted my thoughts on it in the thread.

Then for some unknown reason the time I posted my comment is of relevance for you to comment.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by MB.

It wasn't directly related to my first point but a comment about the Death List isn't irrelevant to the thread when you brought up the Death List to begin with

Just what exactly was the point of you commenting in the first place?

My "time limit" comment wasn't about how long after someone's death you can make a joke, it was about how long after a discussion I was allowed to add my opinion on it?

You seemed to struggle with that my dear MB?

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by MB.

This is a great response to an argument nobody else was still having

Originally Posted by MB.

And to clarify again, I wasn't saying you posted too late for the argument/debate/friendly rainbow cuddly talk-a-thon, but that I think it's best to leave that kind of debate where it was because, at the end of the day, it's an argument over how respectful so-and-so is or isn't in a thread largely for condolences and vaaaaguely mature stuff (which I've probably just put a direct end to with this post) - there's a time and a place etc etc

Ah, I see. Well the post implied I shouldn't have posted because the original discussion had ended.

But I didn't realise you're the forum police.

If I'd have known I'd have simply ignored like I do with the mods.

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by MB.

The original discussion had ended

Right, so I wasn't allowed to comment?

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by MB.

I just didn't think it was the kind of argument people should be carrying on since I figured it would keep going round in circles, but if that makes me the forum police then that's fine

It wasn't an argument.

About three people made a comment on it.

[Ross.]

Originally Posted by MB.

I just didn't think it was the kind of argument people should be carrying on since I figured it would keep going round in circles, but if that makes me the forum police then that's fine

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by MB.

For the third time, my issue wasn't to do with the hour and second and minute at which you posted it, but the fact that it was something that was resolved/had barely been started in the first place and you carried it on - I just felt that was unnecessary

I've repeated myself a lot here which I suppose sums up my thoughts that this whole thing would have been better left at 'some people still find the David's dead thing funny, some find that inappropriate, there we go'

Yes, and I've commented on that too?

Perhaps I posted it too late for the deadline? Is the discussion over yet?