[GoldHeart]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

They don’t even live there. Seeing the haters joyously saying they’re been evicted lmao bless ‘em.

Wasn't it still going to be used by Harry & Meghan as like a vacation home for when they visit?. But now they can't stay there anymore.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by GoldHeart

Wasn't it still going to be used by Harry & Meghan as like a vacation home for when they visit?. But now they can't stay there anymore.

I’m sure some of their celebrity friends will offer them some sort of accommodation when necessary….
Meghan wont set a foot in this country unless she has to..thank god

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

I’m sure some of their celebrity friends will offer them some sort of accommodation when necessary….
Meghan wont set a foot in this country unless she has to..thank god

Well we did drive them out so why would they even want to return?

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Well we did drive them out so why would they even want to return?

They drove themselves out to cash in on their titles….and make money trashing their own…

[bots]

Andrews current home has 31 bedrooms ffs

and he is complaining at having to slum it in frogmore which has 10 bedrooms

and people have sympathy for this shower?

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

Andrews current home has 31 bedrooms ffs

and he is complaining at having to slum it in frogmore which has 10 bedrooms

and people have sympathy for this shower?

I don’t think the bed room count is accurate
Frogmore has five bedrooms andrews place has 30 rooms not all bedrooms

[arista]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

Andrews current home has 31 bedrooms ffs

and he is complaining at having to slum it in frogmore which has 10 bedrooms

and people have sympathy for this shower?

Yes he is lucky Frogmore
is available for him.


One Pervert does not need 31 Rooms

[Oliver_W]

For some reason I had it in my head there was an "unwritten rule" or maybe an actual one that any of the Royal Family could visit any of the Royal Residencies for as long as they wanted?

[Glenn.]

Also I wonder if they’ll be reimbursed the £2.4m they paid to renovate it? The money that the public demand they repaid when they withdrew from duties.

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Also I wonder if they’ll be reimbursed the £2.4m they paid to renovate it? The money that the public demand they repaid when they withdrew from duties.

They only paid up because they used tax payers money refurbishing a home they never intended to live in permanently….

[Glenn.]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

They only paid up because they used tax payers money refurbishing a home they never intended to live in permanently….

Which should now be reimbursed

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by Glenn.

Which should now be reimbursed

Why??… the house was gifted to them as a foreseeable home…they refurbished it at our expense…they don’t own it and they don’t live here anymore…they chose to vacate to live in America….

[Cherie]

Originally Posted by rusticgal

Why??… the house was gifted to them as a foreseeable home…they refurbished it at our expense…they don’t own it and they don’t live here anymore…they chose to vacate to live in America….

If you rent perfectly habitable house, but choose to redecorate to your own taste, the landlord does not have to pay for this when you move out, it was their choice to refurbish

[thesheriff443]

They knew all along they would not be able to keep frogmore as a home if they were no longer working royals , hence they tried the half in half out option which was rightfully rejected.
And I believe their belongings were already in storage as I said in a previous thread.

[arista]

[arista]

[bots]

it's hardly a cruel eviction when they are never there and have their own multi million mansion. A cruel eviction is when some poor sod gets evicted and they end up homeless

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

it's hardly a cruel eviction when they are never there and have their own multi million mansion. A cruel eviction is when some poor sod gets evicted and they end up homeless

It’s all pantomime

[jet]

Daily Mail
“Speaking of: have you heard about Harry's latest money-grubbing scheme? It's a live online chat about all his traumas. Can't imagine he's got anything new to say — how to top tales of a frostbitten penis and sex next to a box of his dead mother's hair? — but for the low, low price of $33.99, you can log on to a livestream chat and ask your own questions of Harry this Saturday at noon eastern.
Of course, there's a caveat — what, did you expect something straightforward here? Comments will be disabled and there will be no live questions taken. Our prince will be fielding only pre-submitted and pre-approved queries.”

The Victimisation Tour continues….

[rusticgal]

Originally Posted by jet

Daily Mail
“Speaking of: have you heard about Harry's latest money-grubbing scheme? It's a live online chat about all his traumas. Can't imagine he's got anything new to say — how to top tales of a frostbitten penis and sex next to a box of his dead mother's hair? — but for the low, low price of $33.99, you can log on to a livestream chat and ask your own questions of Harry this Saturday at noon eastern.
Of course, there's a caveat — what, did you expect something straightforward here? Comments will be disabled and there will be no live questions taken. Our prince will be fielding only pre-submitted and pre-approved queries.”

The Victimisation Tour continues….

Oh dear....so he cant even to a 'livestream' chat without it being a complete farce....

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by jet

Daily Mail
“Speaking of: have you heard about Harry's latest money-grubbing scheme? It's a live online chat about all his traumas. Can't imagine he's got anything new to say — how to top tales of a frostbitten penis and sex next to a box of his dead mother's hair? — but for the low, low price of $33.99, you can log on to a livestream chat and ask your own questions of Harry this Saturday at noon eastern.
Of course, there's a caveat — what, did you expect something straightforward here? Comments will be disabled and there will be no live questions taken. Our prince will be fielding only pre-submitted and pre-approved queries.”

The Victimisation Tour continues….

Omg didn't know about this thanks for promoting it

[GoldHeart]

Live chat stream $33.99???!

[jet]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

Omg didn't know about this thanks for promoting it

You are very welcome - they do need the support as their popularity is crashing.....and you'll get a free WAAAGH book, how exciting for you!!!

https://www.news.com.au/entertainmen...41821df9587b0c
The 38-year-old will be joined in conversation with Dr Gabriel Maté to discuss “living with loss and the importance of personal healing,” according to the website, and that entry fee includes a copy of Spare.
In case anyone doesn’t have their pocket calculator to hand, that’s a $1,479,966 drop in how much it costs to hear from the horsey HRH’s mouth in only 36 months. If ever there was a way of illustrating just how much things have changed since those heady first weeks, post-Megxit, when it looked like Harry and wife Meghan, Duchess of Sussex had the world at their feet and the royal family on the ropes, then this is it.
If there is one thing that Harry has proven this year it is that familiarity breeds both contempt and low price points.

[Cherie]

Harry and Meghan's spokesperson said a "request" had been made for them to give up Frogmore Cottage, near Windsor Castle.

The spokesperson said: "We can confirm the Duke and Duchess of Sussex have been requested to vacate their residence at Frogmore Cottage."

Reports have claimed the move, which removes their final remaining foothold in the UK, was sanctioned by the King.
https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/uknew...4710b28d&ei=12

[Glenn.]

Literally already a thread. Don’t need yet another one