[MeMyselfAndI]

Originally Posted by Santi Claus

If it wasn't for Munch then Mollie might still be on here.

Don't drag her name because you can, she was trying too stop it, and was asking you guys too. All you've done now is prove you were involved.

[Drew.]

Originally Posted by MeMyselfAndLeona

Don't drag her name because you can, she was trying too stop it, and was asking you guys too. All you've done now is prove you were involved.

the whole SH situation was dealt with privately, she admitted she was wrong and now shes posting regularly and getting on with most members and being herself and she's probably happy about it now. The whole Mollie/Mike thing was private between a few people until you were bought into it by Munch and were on the verge of revealing it to the whole forum before Raph decided to before you lot did. You have fun from being controversial and getting involved in debates/arguments so we wont pretend you probably didnt enjoy the whole thing. If things weren't revealed to you then the outcome could have been a lot better.

[MeMyselfAndI]

Originally Posted by Santi Claus

the whole SH situation was dealt with privately, she admitted she was wrong and now shes posting regularly and getting on with most members and being herself and she's probably happy about it now. The whole Mollie/Mike thing was private between a few people until you were bought into it by Munch and were on the verge of revealing it to the whole forum before Raph decided to before you lot did. You have fun from being controversial and getting involved in debates/arguments so we wont pretend you probably didnt enjoy the whole thing. If things weren't revealed to you then the outcome could have been a lot better.

shut up, I did not make it worse, I asked him too stop repeatedly

[Brother Leon]

Originally Posted by Santi Claus

the whole SH situation was dealt with privately, she admitted she was wrong and now shes posting regularly and getting on with most members and being herself and she's probably happy about it now. The whole Mollie/Mike thing was private between a few people until you were bought into it by Munch and were on the verge of revealing it to the whole forum before Raph decided to before you lot did. You have fun from being controversial and getting involved in debates/arguments so we wont pretend you probably didnt enjoy the whole thing. If things weren't revealed to you then the outcome could have been a lot better.

Why you even wasting your time?

I was enjoying their posts tbh.

[Me. I Am Salman]

Originally Posted by Father Simpmas

Why you even wasting your time?

I was enjoying their posts tbh.

You would wouldn't you, you know everything about it considering you were part of the catfish team (and I've seen the screenshot so don't go denying)

[MeMyselfAndI]

Salman is a cyberbullying victim from some of these these members & their antics, hes allowed his say rih3

[Brother Leon]

This thread though.

[Kyle]

Originally Posted by Father Simpmas

This thread though.

Just read it all through. This is one hell of a history lesson.

Are these supposed to be the better days that everyone keeps talking about?

[Ramsay]

Wow

[Vicky.]

Does noone see just why the person in question (helped by friends) would want to find out who Mollie actually was, after he spent actual time and money going to meet 'her'?

Would you all be on mollies side over this if it had been underage people 'she' had been luring to meet 'her'? Its ok just because the person in question was 20?

As I said earlier, the contacting family members was disgusting. However, I get why the 'investigation' took place. Completely. Its not like it was just a totally random thing that was decided..the catalyst was 'Mollie' planning on meeting another member, despite not being who she said she was. Thats not to say I agree with all aspects of how they went about finding out she was actually a guy, but when you put the whole thing in context, what they did doesn't seem half as bad. When you make ot they randomly 'stalked' 'her' then of course it sounds awful.

[Lee.]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Does noone see just why the person in question (helped by friends) would want to find out who Mollie actually was, after he spent actual time and money going to met 'her'?

Would you all be on mollies side over this if it had been underage people 'she' had been luring to meet 'her'? Its ok just because the person in question was 20?

As I said earlier, the contacting family members was disgusting. However, I get why the 'investigation' took place. Completely. Its not like it was just a totally random thing that was decided..the catalyst was 'Mollie' planning on meeting another member, despite not being who she said she was. Thats not to say I agree with all aspects of how they went about finding out she was actually a guy, but when you put the whole thing in context, what they did doesn't seem half as bad. When you make ot they randomly 'staled' 'her' then of course it sounds awful.

Yes I agree.. It was reactionary.

Very different to the Stacey situation.

[Me. I Am Salman]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

Does noone see just why the person in question (helped by friends) would want to find out who Mollie actually was, after he spent actual time and money going to meet 'her'?

Would you all be on mollies side over this if it had been underage people 'she' had been luring to meet 'her'? Its ok just because the person in question was 20?

As I said earlier, the contacting family members was disgusting. However, I get why the 'investigation' took place. Completely. Its not like it was just a totally random thing that was decided..the catalyst was 'Mollie' planning on meeting another member, despite not being who she said she was. Thats not to say I agree with all aspects of how they went about finding out she was actually a guy, but when you put the whole thing in context, what they did doesn't seem half as bad. When you make ot they randomly 'stalked' 'her' then of course it sounds awful.

They've repeatedly offended, there was no excuse for that so I hold on to my judgement that the person is a creep who should have been banned

[Vicky.]

Plus, no offence, but I don't particularly like (or dislike) the people involved...so my opinion is not because they are 'friends'

[Jake.]

Exactly Vicky, couldn't have put it better.

[MeMyselfAndI]

I was banned for 6 months, how could I reveal it too the forum? You clearly like too bull****

[Jordan.]

lmao I can't at people thinking it's acceptable for members to invade others private life as long as theirs a reason to do so.

[Jake.]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

lmao I can't at people thinking it's acceptable for members to invade others private life as long as theirs a reason to do so.

Is saving somebodies pictures from FB not invading their privacy then?

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by Snowjakes

Is saving somebodies pictures from FB not invading their privacy then?

Yes, I've already admitted what Stacey did was wrong. She's been punished for it where as these lot haven't.

[Me. I Am Salman]

Originally Posted by Snowjakes

Is saving somebodies pictures from FB not invading their privacy then?

He's already stated a million fair reasons why she should now be unbanned go back to the first few pages, there's no need to talk about Stacey anymore

[Z]

Originally Posted by Salman!

He's already stated a million fair reasons why she should now be unbanned go back to the first few pages, there's no need to talk about Stacey anymore

Great time to lock the thread then really...

[Jake.]

Originally Posted by Salman!

He's already stated a million fair reasons why she should now be unbanned to back to the first few pages

So, this is where I get a bit confused, it's completely wrong to do it unless you're Stacey who's been banned for a few years? Surely if it's wrong, it's wrong, you feel ****ty about having your picture saved and used against you but campaigning for a person who did this to everybody to come back?

[Z]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

lmao I can't at people thinking it's acceptable for members to invade others private life as long as theirs a reason to do so.

So was it not okay for Stacey to out MeMyselfandI's fake personality?

[Marsh.]

Originally Posted by Jordan.

lmao I can't at people thinking it's acceptable for members to invade others private life as long as theirs a reason to do so.

As opposed to having no reason at all?

Lmao. I can't at people thinking someone has changed after 3 years when evidence on another forum suggest they're still the same vile person they always were.

[Jordan.]

Originally Posted by 08marsh

As opposed to having no reason at all?

Lmao. I can't at people thinking someone has changed after 3 years when evidence on another forum suggest they're still the same vile person they always were.

And what would you know? Have you even spoken to Stacey?

[Josy]

Originally Posted by Salman!

It's not hypocritical at all, a member repeatedly being stalkerish yet be able to continue posting and be loved by the forum (by you for example) and someone who did something ONCE, years ago, when they were young, and nowhere near on the scale of Mollie/Mike, and is ashamed of their actions (she says herself she regrets it) be permabanned and hated on by so many members on this site, is what hypocrisy is

-exhales-

I have never been friendly or 'loved' the person that contacted Mikes family so have no idea what you are on about...

Also Staceys ban was for a lot more than something that was done ONCE.