[Oliver_W]

I hope there aren't any repercussions for the minor, selling underage explicit photos is still a crime. There's not any indication (that I know of?) that there was an element of coercion?

[Zizu]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

I hope there aren't any repercussions for the minor, selling underage explicit photos is still a crime. There's not any indication (that I know of?) that there was an element of coercion?

I thought the youngster took to drugs and committed suicide ??

Wasn’t the mum blaming the celeb ?

Unless I misheard something ??


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

[bots]

the whole thing is pretty messed up really. How did the person become a crack addict at 17. How did the parents not notice that the person had a lot more cash to spend. How can someone paying cash to another person be blamed for their addictions. Why does the mother keep referring to her 20 year old as a child. Even at 17, they are a young adult

The presenter is dodgy for sure, but he wasn't responsible for everything else

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by Zizu

I thought the youngster took to drugs and committed suicide ??

Wasn’t the mum blaming the celeb ?

Unless I misheard something ??


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

If the youngster committed suicide that passed me by.

[Christmas Dynasnow]

[Candy Annie Cane]

Originally Posted by Zizu

I thought the youngster took to drugs and committed suicide ??

Wasn’t the mum blaming the celeb ?

Unless I misheard something ??


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

No, I don't think they have committed suicide. They are a crack addict but still alive

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

the whole thing is pretty messed up really. How did the person become a crack addict at 17. How did the parents not notice that the person had a lot more cash to spend. How can someone paying cash to another person be blamed for their addictions. Why does the mother keep referring to her 20 year old as a child. Even at 17, they are a young adult

The presenter is dodgy for sure, but he wasn't responsible for everything else

Not only did the celeb push the kid into drugs, but opened the door to sex work. Pure evil.

[bots]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

Not only did the celeb push the kid into drugs, but opened the door to sex work. Pure evil.

how did he push the person into drugs? If you work for an employer and they pay you, are they pushing you into drugs? As i said, the presenter is obviously dodgy, but a lot of blame is being put on him for things completely unrelated. There doesn't appear to be any suggestion of coercion

[Liam-]

Going to the persons employer rather than the police if you have iron clad evidence of the crime committed, isn’t a very good look

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

I wasnt aware that in order to have an opinion on music you have to be a dreadful manufactured teenage girl group.

This is a revelation

I’m afraid you are unaware of most of what you say.

[Cherry Christmas]

The licence payer has a right to know who this individual is, their duty of care to other male presenters is shocking

[Cherry Christmas]

Originally Posted by Liam-

Going to the persons employer rather than the police if you have iron clad evidence of the crime committed, isn’t a very good look

Maybe the police are involved?

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Cherie

The licence payer has a right to know who this individual is, their duty of care to other male presenters is shocking

Come on cherie that’s not how it works

[bots]

The BBC seem to forget it's a service paid for by the public

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by bitontheslide

The BBC seem to forget it's a service paid for by the public

They are a modern day mafia that use threats to extort money

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

Come on cherie that’s not how it works

Well it is - by not clarifying, all male presenters have the possibility that it's them being bandied around.

[Christmas Dynasnow]

so glad i dont pay their silly tax

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

Well it is - by not clarifying, all male presenters have the possibility that it's them being bandied around.

We have a world now we’re it’s trial by public

[arista]

Police were told before Friday

[Oliver_W]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

We have a world now we’re it’s trial by public

Exactly.

By leaving virtually all of their tv talent up in question, the BBC is failing all of them.

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by Oliver_W

Exactly.

By leaving virtually all of their tv talent up in question, the BBC is failing all of them.

No, accusations are just that, accusations

If wrong doing is proven then it’s should come into the public domain

I could accuse you someone of rape, it shouldn’t be a guessing game of who it is

[Christmas Dynasnow]

an
MP could out this nonce in the house tomorrow

has happened before

[thesheriff443]

Originally Posted by LeatherTrumpet

an
MP could out this nonce in the house tomorrow

has happened before

Strong words without out knowing the facts

[Christmas Dynasnow]

Originally Posted by thesheriff443

Strong words without out knowing the facts

immunity in the house

[Tinsel Toes]

Originally Posted by Cherie

Maybe the police are involved?

BBC have informed police.