[Johnduddy]

Lisa would be well out of it was a vote to evict so why have they changed it to save on this eviction ?

A lot of people who would usually vote wont bother now because they think their favourite will be safe....I think theres going to be an upset...

[x-desire-x]

Not sure but it might be because they are evicting more than one.

[chris1232]

I agree with both!

[Jintyrocks]

How else will they keep in the strong characters? Vote to evict and either Lisa or Marcus would go.... Vote to save and you might lose one of the non-entities.

[Marc]

To get rid of the least popular ones!

[Claymores]

Vote to save is a cheap income generator.

In a normal vote to evict, only 2 or three of them would get targetted. For example, it would be a waste of time/money trying to evict Halfarse as it wouldn't happen. BUT in a vote to save, his fans have to telephone save him.

[Captain.Remy]

It should always be a vote to save. Not especially in this series because the results would have been the same but it would have been useful in previous series. We wouldn't have lost so many entertaining housemates in the first weeks.

[neonlight]

It makes them more money, it's as simple as that.

[Savetherainforest]

Kerching....I hear those cash tills ringing for Berlosconi...save your money

[Tom]

Originally posted by Captain.Remy
It should always be a vote to save. Not especially in this series because the results would have been the same but it would have been useful in previous series. We wouldn't have lost so many entertaining housemates in the first weeks.

It would have the same outcome in a 2 way vote though

People moan for a vote to save when everyone is up anyway so whats the big issue here? Because people think Lisa will be saved? They might be in for a pleasant surprise tomorrow (I reckon her David or Hira will go)