Home Menu

Site Navigation


Notices

BB10 Big Brother 10 from 2009 was won by Sophie Reade.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old 18-08-2009, 08:57 PM #1
Sir_Diary_of_Roomus's Avatar
Sir_Diary_of_Roomus Sir_Diary_of_Roomus is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 871
Sir_Diary_of_Roomus Sir_Diary_of_Roomus is offline
Senior Member
Sir_Diary_of_Roomus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 871
Default Siavash basically made a fool of BB

Nominations have been unfairly decided since week one, apart from when BB has intervened a couple of times. When somebody has total control over 5-6 thick idiots and essentially you can pick off who you want to go up for eviction, the game is no longer a game, it's a shambles.
If I was in there, I'd tell BB to shove their noms up their arse aswell. Why should I sit and adhere to their rules every week only to get *****d over week by week by a faction that has dominated this series and has seen minimal intervention.
Sir_Diary_of_Roomus is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-08-2009, 08:58 PM #2
santaa santaa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 801
santaa santaa is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 801
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Sir_Diary_of_Roomus
Nominations have been unfairly decided since week one, apart from when BB has intervened a couple of times. When somebody has total control over 5-6 thick idiots and essentially you can pick off who you want to go up for eviction, the game is no longer a game, it's a shambles.
If I was in there, I'd tell BB to shove their noms up their arse aswell. Why should I sit and adhere to their rules every week only to get *****d over week by week by a faction that has dominated this series and has seen minimal intervention.

Well said
santaa is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-08-2009, 08:59 PM #3
pixee's Avatar
pixee pixee is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,291
pixee pixee is offline
Senior Member
pixee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,291
Default

Because they wouldn't dare not do as they are told? does that not concern you about people?
pixee is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-08-2009, 09:00 PM #4
Tom Tom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,738

Favourites (more):
BB12: Anton
CBB7: Stephanie


Tom Tom is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 23,738

Favourites (more):
BB12: Anton
CBB7: Stephanie


Default

I think BB actually shown Siavash who is the boss by nominating for him (as much as I disagree with intervention). Siavash didn't get his own way for the whole house to be up
Tom is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 18-08-2009, 09:14 PM #5
JTM45 JTM45 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Usa
Posts: 9,881

Favourites (more):
CBB2024: Fern Britton
BB2023: Olivia
JTM45 JTM45 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Usa
Posts: 9,881

Favourites (more):
CBB2024: Fern Britton
BB2023: Olivia
Default

BB have been making fools out of the viewing public for years now by setting up nominations and making rules so things go the way they want to get the most people voting so it's about time someone made a fool of them in return!

If everyone did exactly what they were told to by authority figures we might as well just live in a dictatorship.

People should ALWAYS question authority and if they don't agree with what they're being told to do then they shouldn't do it.

It's called freedom of choice people!
JTM45 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 19-08-2009, 01:18 PM #6
shirl1 shirl1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 245
shirl1 shirl1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 245
Default

here,here
shirl1 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 19-08-2009, 01:21 PM #7
Arneldo's Avatar
Arneldo Arneldo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ireland
Posts: 23,508


Arneldo Arneldo is offline
Senior Member
Arneldo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Ireland
Posts: 23,508


Default

Siavash is just an attention seeker. Everyone was talking about Bea, and he wanted some attention and thats why he didn't nominate.
Arneldo is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 19-08-2009, 01:23 PM #8
ange7 ange7 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,327

Favourites:
BB11: John James
ange7 ange7 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,327

Favourites:
BB11: John James
Default

awwww dry your eyes.
You all sound like Rodrigo. "waaaaa THEY ALL MUST FOLLOW THE RULES!!!"
zzzz
ange7 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 19-08-2009, 01:26 PM #9
MissKittyFantastico's Avatar
MissKittyFantastico MissKittyFantastico is offline
MissKittyFantastico
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Gwladys Street
Posts: 21,129

Favourites:
X Factor 2010: Matt Cardle


MissKittyFantastico MissKittyFantastico is offline
MissKittyFantastico
MissKittyFantastico's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Gwladys Street
Posts: 21,129

Favourites:
X Factor 2010: Matt Cardle


Default

I actually agree with Siavash's reasons for not nominating this week.

There are people in there who are **** scared about going up for the public vote, and nobody should get a free ride to the final. He assumed the whole house, or at least HE would be put up for not nominating.

BB have made a joke of the whole thing anyway by letting them discuss nominations, as well as nominating being a fundamental rule, so is the NON DISCUSSION of who you plan on nominating, but BB have changed that so people can for all intents and purposes, gang up and pick off certain people. That's not fair. And that was the point Siavash was making when he said Bea was negative last week but people supported her, because it suited them, they wanted Freddie out. Now he's gone, they don't need Bea anymore, and all of a sudden she is a negative person, so they'll nominate her.

I see where he is coming from totally. I don't agree that he has an ego, or is trying to protect himself at all, he just thinks it would be fairer for everyone to be up, seeing as the whole nomination thing has become a total joke now they are allowed to discuss them!
MissKittyFantastico is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 19-08-2009, 01:29 PM #10
CaudleHalbard's Avatar
CaudleHalbard CaudleHalbard is offline
Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,079
CaudleHalbard CaudleHalbard is offline
Platinum Member
CaudleHalbard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,079
Default

BB is unwittingly creating its own demise.

I am now having doubts whether BB11 will actually happen, although Endemol have the rights to do a show in 2010.
CaudleHalbard is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 19-08-2009, 01:30 PM #11
ange7 ange7 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,327

Favourites:
BB11: John James
ange7 ange7 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sydney
Posts: 5,327

Favourites:
BB11: John James
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by MissKittyFantastico
I actually agree with Siavash's reasons for not nominating this week.

There are people in there who are **** scared about going up for the public vote, and nobody should get a free ride to the final. He assumed the whole house, or at least HE would be put up for not nominating.

BB have made a joke of the whole thing anyway by letting them discuss nominations, as well as nominating being a fundamental rule, so is the NON DISCUSSION of who you plan on nominating, but BB have changed that so people can for all intents and purposes, gang up and pick off certain people. That's not fair. And that was the point Siavash was making when he said Bea was negative last week but people supported her, because it suited them, they wanted Freddie out. Now he's gone, they don't need Bea anymore, and all of a sudden she is a negative person, so they'll nominate her.

I see where he is coming from totally. I don't agree that he has an ego, or is trying to protect himself at all, he just thinks it would be fairer for everyone to be up, seeing as the whole nomination thing has become a total joke now they are allowed to discuss them!
FTW!
ange7 is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 19-08-2009, 01:42 PM #12
Slothy Slothy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 177
Slothy Slothy is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 177
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by ange7
Quote:
Originally posted by MissKittyFantastico
I actually agree with Siavash's reasons for not nominating this week.

There are people in there who are **** scared about going up for the public vote, and nobody should get a free ride to the final. He assumed the whole house, or at least HE would be put up for not nominating.

BB have made a joke of the whole thing anyway by letting them discuss nominations, as well as nominating being a fundamental rule, so is the NON DISCUSSION of who you plan on nominating, but BB have changed that so people can for all intents and purposes, gang up and pick off certain people. That's not fair. And that was the point Siavash was making when he said Bea was negative last week but people supported her, because it suited them, they wanted Freddie out. Now he's gone, they don't need Bea anymore, and all of a sudden she is a negative person, so they'll nominate her.

I see where he is coming from totally. I don't agree that he has an ego, or is trying to protect himself at all, he just thinks it would be fairer for everyone to be up, seeing as the whole nomination thing has become a total joke now they are allowed to discuss them!
FTW!
Double FTW (:
People will twist any situation against a housemate they don't like. I know I do the same. Siavash has more balls for doing it, not knowing what the outcome is going to be. Even though Lisa isn't as bad now, she has always stuck to every rule, quite boring to watch when people do that. Her reason was to avoid an eviction completely.
Slothy is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 19-08-2009, 02:38 PM #13
google google is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,099
google google is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,099
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by Slothy
Quote:
Originally posted by ange7
Quote:
Originally posted by MissKittyFantastico
I actually agree with Siavash's reasons for not nominating this week.

There are people in there who are **** scared about going up for the public vote, and nobody should get a free ride to the final. He assumed the whole house, or at least HE would be put up for not nominating.

BB have made a joke of the whole thing anyway by letting them discuss nominations, as well as nominating being a fundamental rule, so is the NON DISCUSSION of who you plan on nominating, but BB have changed that so people can for all intents and purposes, gang up and pick off certain people. That's not fair. And that was the point Siavash was making when he said Bea was negative last week but people supported her, because it suited them, they wanted Freddie out. Now he's gone, they don't need Bea anymore, and all of a sudden she is a negative person, so they'll nominate her.

I see where he is coming from totally. I don't agree that he has an ego, or is trying to protect himself at all, he just thinks it would be fairer for everyone to be up, seeing as the whole nomination thing has become a total joke now they are allowed to discuss them!
FTW!
Double FTW (:
People will twist any situation against a housemate they don't like. I know I do the same. Siavash has more balls for doing it, not knowing what the outcome is going to be. Even though Lisa isn't as bad now, she has always stuck to every rule, quite boring to watch when people do that. Her reason was to avoid an eviction completely.
Agree Vash to win!
google is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 19-08-2009, 02:45 PM #14
UglyBaby UglyBaby is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 161
UglyBaby UglyBaby is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 161
Default

He's a sneaky, disingenuous BS-er. He should have been kicked out long since for constantly going against the rules. Why is he on the show if he doesn't want to play the game? Nominating people is the core of the show and the part viewers enjoy most. It's just arrogant of him to think he can play by his own rules. And his reasons are PATHETIC. Totally so.

Kick him out! How anyone could think that mumbling sloth deserves to win astounds me.
UglyBaby is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 19-08-2009, 02:46 PM #15
Zien Zien is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 657
Zien Zien is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 657
Default

He made a fool out of himself - a tw*t through and through and now closer to losing ha-ha
Zien is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 19-08-2009, 02:56 PM #16
google google is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,099
google google is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,099
Default

Vash is a legend
google is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 19-08-2009, 03:06 PM #17
BitterFruit's Avatar
BitterFruit BitterFruit is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 684
BitterFruit BitterFruit is offline
Senior Member
BitterFruit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 684
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by JTM45
BB have been making fools out of the viewing public for years now by setting up nominations and making rules so things go the way they want to get the most people voting so it's about time someone made a fool of them in return!

If everyone did exactly what they were told to by authority figures we might as well just live in a dictatorship.

People should ALWAYS question authority and if they don't agree with what they're being told to do then they shouldn't do it.

It's called freedom of choice people!
when I catch my nephew cheating at Monopoly next Xmas, I must remember he's striking a blow against capitalistic society and the unfair yoke that is property ownership

who'd have thought
BitterFruit is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 19-08-2009, 03:11 PM #18
MargeryFan's Avatar
MargeryFan MargeryFan is offline
Lemon Twerper
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,386
MargeryFan MargeryFan is offline
Lemon Twerper
MargeryFan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2,386
Default

Well put.
MargeryFan is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 19-08-2009, 04:03 PM #19
bbisfun bbisfun is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 510
bbisfun bbisfun is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 510
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by JTM45
BB have been making fools out of the viewing public for years now by setting up nominations and making rules so things go the way they want to get the most people voting so it's about time someone made a fool of them in return!

If everyone did exactly what they were told to by authority figures we might as well just live in a dictatorship.

People should ALWAYS question authority and if they don't agree with what they're being told to do then they shouldn't do it.

It's called freedom of choice people!
Lol you ****ing noob, freedom of choice was discarded the moment that wanker Saivash adhered to BB terms and conditions before entering the house.
bbisfun is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 19-08-2009, 04:03 PM #20
lavabird lavabird is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 128
lavabird lavabird is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 128
Default

i think hes just making himself look weak and stupid ,play the game or go home
lavabird is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 19-08-2009, 04:13 PM #21
HarryRag HarryRag is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tin Pan Alley
Posts: 1,176
HarryRag HarryRag is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Tin Pan Alley
Posts: 1,176
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by google
Vash is a legend
thats what you think. he never did anything
HarryRag is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 19-08-2009, 04:17 PM #22
UglyBaby UglyBaby is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 161
UglyBaby UglyBaby is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 161
Default

His principals are all over the place. he nominated early on but is now plucking pathetic excuses out of his hairy ass. Why?

For ATTENTION. Simple as.

I pity the fools who buy his muddled brand of BS. He doesn't even make sense half the time!
UglyBaby is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 19-08-2009, 04:20 PM #23
Wilton_Shagpile Wilton_Shagpile is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 294
Wilton_Shagpile Wilton_Shagpile is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 294
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by MissKittyFantastico
I actually agree with Siavash's reasons for not nominating this week.

There are people in there who are **** scared about going up for the public vote, and nobody should get a free ride to the final. He assumed the whole house, or at least HE would be put up for not nominating.

BB have made a joke of the whole thing anyway by letting them discuss nominations, as well as nominating being a fundamental rule, so is the NON DISCUSSION of who you plan on nominating, but BB have changed that so people can for all intents and purposes, gang up and pick off certain people. That's not fair. And that was the point Siavash was making when he said Bea was negative last week but people supported her, because it suited them, they wanted Freddie out. Now he's gone, they don't need Bea anymore, and all of a sudden she is a negative person, so they'll nominate her.

I see where he is coming from totally. I don't agree that he has an ego, or is trying to protect himself at all, he just thinks it would be fairer for everyone to be up, seeing as the whole nomination thing has become a total joke now they are allowed to discuss them!
Agree totally
I wish the whole voting was down to the public every week

let them talk about what they like, leave the voting to us, they normally nominate the wrong ones anyway....WTF do they know
Wilton_Shagpile is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 19-08-2009, 04:22 PM #24
Wilton_Shagpile Wilton_Shagpile is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 294
Wilton_Shagpile Wilton_Shagpile is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 294
Default

Quote:
Originally posted by HarryRag
Quote:
Originally posted by google
Vash is a legend
thats what you think. he never did anything
He doesn't need to he is just "Siavash"
Wilton_Shagpile is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Old 19-08-2009, 04:31 PM #25
oh.really oh.really is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 202
oh.really oh.really is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 202
Default

He doesn't nominate because he sees how it's a case of being picked off one by one and just doesn't want to be one of them. Self preservation man
oh.really is offline   Reply With QuoteReply With Quote
Reply

Bookmark/share this topic

Tags
basically, bb, fool, made, siavash


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:06 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
 

About Us ThisisBigBrother.com

"Big Brother and UK Television Forum. Est. 2001"

 

© 2023
no new posts