[BIG-BRO-FAN]

Who was in the right in the David/Bea arguement tonight?

I could see where David was coming from.

I think Bea's gone on Friday anyway.

Bea is a huge gameplayer.

[King Gizzard]

David

[LipticBoven]

Althou i dislike bea, im on her side.

She had to nominated 2 ppl.

[Deliverance]

I'm on Davids side obviously. I'm also glad he stood up for himself so strongly. Fair play to him. Beas attempt to villify him blew up in her face.

[BIG-BRO-FAN]

Originally posted by Nathan
David

Thanks for your constructive answer

[King Gizzard]

Thats okay!

[Niamh.]

David, Bea played him, she licked is arse all week and made sure he wouldn't vote for her. Then implied she wasn't going to vote for him, then voted for him and said she didn't

[prkp12]

Bea's

[Nigeria_Bob]

Dave

[boomoo]

He did not object to her nominating him only to the fact that she said she did not nom him.

Then she made it worse with her excuse.

[Combo]

I'm on Davids side. She should of used her common sense and nominated someone who is unlikely to be up for eviction. That's why I would of done.

David has done so much for her. She could of just nominated someone else like Charlie or Siavash or even Lisa.

[mother6]

Well her reason was lame lets be honest, Charlie spat water in her face and she was that annoyed that she kept the others up with her lecturing, Rodrigo laughed at her histrionics when mum did not give her a message and David comforted her. How could she ever come out of this blameless.

[Brad.]

davids side

[oh.really]

I thought it was all really funny until Lisa chipped in. She's only pissed because one of her henchmen has been put up for eviction and you can tell from the look on her face when Davids name was announced how shocked she was.

I'm on Bea's side, much as I hate to say it, they can nominate who they want.

[Kazanne]

David,Why didn't Bea nominate Charlie after he spat water in her face,or even Marcus or Siavash she betrayed yet another who befriended her

[XxXILuv2PlayXxX]

David's side - Bea is pathetic

[jadore212]

bea side

[mimec]

David - 100 %. Everybody forgot how she acused him of beeing bully and how horrible she was to him. but he was openen to her, comforted her, trusted her. Just gave her a chance. Im not suprised that he was angry.

[Celeb_Rehab]

They are both pathetic!!

I'd side with Bea cosat least she voted.
Unlike dogflaps who again fecks up by not nominating & no one says a bad word to her,although Vash gets plenty of BS thrown at him,they are hypocrites!!!

I want that fekin idiot shrek out !!just to put one up that old hag Lisa.
Apart from one week the scrounger has had a free ride all the way through....

[paulie57]

Neither. She lied and he over reactede!

[IndigoJo]

Originally posted by paulie57
Neither. She lied and he over reactede!

I'm with you!!!

[fitz2k2]

D

[Slothy]

Well anyone who is on Beas side is ignorant. Of course you have to nominate 2 people, but if you're really close to someone for a whole week and even tell others how david & you have made a fresh start & are so close now (when roddy was in the bath the morning after the charlie argument) then you can assume they'd not nominate you over others she'd continuously moaned about all week.

Thus, she was stating the obvious saying she had to nominate 2 people, her reason was **** and made up to try and dig herself out of a hole.

For once I'm with the sausage, david.

[kisywisy]

team david!! she's a liar and was grabbing at straws trying to justify herself

[Clockers]

I may dislike Bea but it was obvious to anyone who is not biased regard their opinions that spas man David was in the wrong.