[BONNEIP]

Do what most of them don't want, make it all up with a vote to evict the least popular, this might help you's win back some control & liven the house up for us viewers, especially us who stay up to watch the LF, which usualy starts as their all off to bed.

[Brad.]

that would mean BB are giving in to the HMs, they dont want to give that impression..

[ElProximo]

Originally posted by BONNEIP
Do what most of them don't want, make it all up with a vote to evict the least popular, this might help you's win back some control & liven the house up for us viewers, especially us who stay up to watch the LF, which usualy starts as their all off to bed.

This programme has been astonishingly successful for a decade using the basic premise that the HMs nominate two to leave and then the audience picks one and sends one back.
Without getting into a big sociology article - this is core to what creates the drama and intrigue and suspense and social dynamics and tension and the 'back and forth',
and,
So no. I do not want this. The further they get away from these core premise rules the WORSE this gets.
This season is a good example.

Sorry no.
I like the original fundamental agreed-upon rules to continue.
That is why I started watching. Its what I expect and why Im following it.

[BONNEIP]

Well as both Siavash & Sophie want to be up give them their wish.

[AhmedFan2004]

They wouldn't do Vote to Evict if all are up, it'd be Vote to Save again.

[dixiebell1991]

Originally posted by ElProximo

This programme has been astonishingly successful for a decade using the basic premise that the HMs nominate two to leave and then the audience picks one and sends one back.
Without getting into a big sociology article - this is core to what creates the drama and intrigue and suspense and social dynamics and tension and the 'back and forth',
and,
So no. I do not want this. The further they get away from these core premise rules the WORSE this gets.
This season is a good example.

Sorry no.
I like the original fundamental agreed-upon rules to continue.
That is why I started watching. Its what I expect and why Im following it.

agree - bb has lost control, their 'punishments' are a joke and do not have control over tthe house. defeats the whole concept of 'big brother'.

[Vicky.]

Originally posted by AhmedFan2004
They wouldn't do Vote to Evict if all are up, it'd be Vote to Save again.

If they were going to do that, they would just open the 'vote to win' lines and do it that way I think...

If its vote to save, David would be toast...then again, if they open the win phonelines, he would probably be gone also.

[CaudleHalbard]

The nominations system has been destroyed by BB, by letting HMs discuss noms. There is really no point to it any more.

So put all HMs up for eviction - and maybe make it a double eviction this week... about time we had one!

[King Gizzard]

I think some people are scared their favouirtes (lisa) would go if it was everyone up. Thus the rejection of the idea.

[AhmedFan2004]

Originally posted by VickyJ

If they were going to do that, they would just open the 'vote to win' lines and do it that way I think...

If its vote to save, David would be toast...then again, if they open the win phonelines, he would probably be gone also.

But they would make more money by having a 'Vote to Save' week next week, and then 'Vote to Win' the final week. Think about it.

[CaraRawr]

:O

[*mazedsalv**]

I agree, if noms take place again I will guarantee Siavash VS Marcus.... which leaves Lisa and Charlie left in the final week.... do we want that?

[poejoe]

If this is the last noms i think bb should just evict whoever refuses to nominate and get the game back on track for the final!

[sooty]

Originally posted by ElProximo

This programme has been astonishingly successful for a decade using the basic premise that the HMs nominate two to leave and then the audience picks one and sends one back.
Without getting into a big sociology article - this is core to what creates the drama and intrigue and suspense and social dynamics and tension and the 'back and forth',
and,
So no. I do not want this. The further they get away from these core premise rules the WORSE this gets.
This season is a good example.

Sorry no.
I like the original fundamental agreed-upon rules to continue.
That is why I started watching. Its what I expect and why Im following it.

I think too many housemates are breaking rules and think it is cool.
The BIG problem is no serious punishmnet. BB seemed to be powerless.

[Kate!]

Originally posted by *mazedsalv**
I agree, if noms take place again I will guarantee Siavash VS Marcus.... which leaves Lisa and Charlie left in the final week.... do we want that?

yes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[staceyxxx]

yehh i knew that AGES ago. lol x

[DrunkerThanMoses]

Cant we have a doulbe eviction...... lisa and charlie out!

[Tom]

Nominate who they want to see in the final and don't put these people up

[scot]

putting everyone up means Marcus stays so I'm all for it!

Actualy Siavish is so eager for the 'everyone up' gig because he knows that without it he is very likely to be up against Marcus alone and no HM wants that!

[?]

It'd be good if they didn't tell them who was up untill Davina said the names.

[Patricia4]

Put them all up to evict and get shut of two Charlie and Lisa

[Becker]

I just can't see them altering the process now with the last nominations coming up. What we need to think of is what will Big Brother be thinking?

You can bet your tank that they watch all the polls and betting odds very closely and take as many surveys as they can to gauge what WE want the most. More importantly what will make us want to watch the show the most.

Might be interesting to setup a poll on it. Here it is

http://www.thisisbigbrother.com/foru...e=1#pid2462233

[oh.really]

Double eviction with Lisa and Charlie. They never get a proper interview when 2 go at once and Charlie won't like not being centre of attention

[NettoSuperstar!]