FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
25-08-2009, 11:36 PM | #1 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
If he really doesn't want a free ride and is wanting to go up, then why didn't he just ask everyone to nom him, like Marcus did in the past, thus ensure a Marcus vs Siavash eviction. He told Charlie that he didn't want this because it would be Marcus vs Siavash. Why not this scenario then?
Going by what Siavash CALCULATED IN HIS MIND, not nomming David ensured a likely 3-way, putting himself up with Marcus and David. This scenario seems fine to him! By doing this, both himself and David would have 3 noms each. It turned out he made an error RE Rodrigo in the end. My only logical conclusion is that he's happy with a likely 3-way eviction, but NOT happy with a 2-way eviction. LOOK HEROIC FOR NOT NOMINATING THUS PUTTING HIMSELF UP + 3-WAY EVICTION WITH UNPOPULAR DAVID = TOP RESULT! He admitted a risk of a 2-way eviction, it was a risk he was willing to take. Playing the 'heroic' card. Also he would look BAD if he tactically tried to ensure a David vs Marcus eviction; contradicting his 'I want to be up, 'No Free Rides', 'Anti-Scheming' ethos. So this wasn't a good option RE public image! Why else not ENSURE a 2-way eviction by asking others to nom him like Marcus had done the past 3 weeks, if he wants to go up THAT much? FULL SCHEMING EXPLANATION: thisisbigbrother.com/forum/viewthread.php?tid=143725 Evict Siavash this Tuesday! Charlie/Lisa votes will split and he could go! |
||
Reply With Quote |
25-08-2009, 11:43 PM | #2 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
Thoughts guys? It's the biggest Q IMO. Why not ensure a 2-way eviction by requesting people to nominate him, as per Marcus? Must be scheming, surely.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
25-08-2009, 11:44 PM | #3 | |||
|
||||
filthy mudblood
|
Cause everyone would have just picked Marcus and him.
So maybe Siavash thought that might be unfair on Marcus. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-08-2009, 11:45 PM | #4 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
He doesn't really wanna go, he just wants to play the hero to ensure that he wins. It's all very transparent.
|
||
Reply With Quote |
25-08-2009, 11:46 PM | #5 | |||
|
||||
Platinum Member
|
Becuase Siavash is almost as much of an airhead as Sophie, Charlie, and the rest (Marcus excluded).
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-08-2009, 11:47 PM | #6 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
Quote:
So why not do a 2-way eviction? Scared? |
||
Reply With Quote |
25-08-2009, 11:47 PM | #7 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Siavash messed up big time and i hope it swings it for marcus to stay
|
||
Reply With Quote |
25-08-2009, 11:48 PM | #8 | |||
|
||||
filthy mudblood
|
Quote:
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-08-2009, 11:49 PM | #9 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
25-08-2009, 11:49 PM | #10 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
Quote:
But this Q is the crux of it, and IMO completely shows Siavash up. He will not ask people to nominate him and ensure a 2-way eviction. |
||
Reply With Quote |
25-08-2009, 11:50 PM | #11 | ||
|
|||
0_o
|
Quote:
Also please dont bring my posts into your arguements. |
||
Reply With Quote |
25-08-2009, 11:51 PM | #12 | |||
|
||||
Focus
|
As he knew the other HMs didnt wanna talk about nominations.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-08-2009, 11:51 PM | #13 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
Quote:
He will not ensure a 2-way eviction, he only fixes things to ensure a 3-way. He only puts himself up as long as David is in the mix. David is the safety net, whilst he doesn't nominate and tries to make himself look heroic. Unless you can bring up another reason as to why he didn't ask others to nominate him! |
||
Reply With Quote |
25-08-2009, 11:52 PM | #14 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
siavash dosent want to go up 1 to 1. he wanted every 1 or at least david in the mix, simple, think ppl think
|
||
Reply With Quote |
25-08-2009, 11:53 PM | #15 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Because Rodrigo, Lisa, David and Charlie dont like talking about who they are going to nominate anyway and would have said he is just trying to mess with the nominations again
He tried to bring it up yesterday and they started having a go at him so he just left them to nominate as they wanted |
||
Reply With Quote |
25-08-2009, 11:54 PM | #16 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
25-08-2009, 11:55 PM | #17 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
25-08-2009, 11:55 PM | #18 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
25-08-2009, 11:57 PM | #19 | |||
|
||||
filthy mudblood
|
Quote:
Also Siavash figured it would be just David and Marcus if he wasn't up as well. By Siavash's calculation, him not nominating was the only way to be up. He figured if he voted for David it would be just David and Marcus. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-08-2009, 11:58 PM | #20 | ||
|
|||
0_o
|
Quote:
So...how could he be using dave as a safety net if it could actually ensure that siavash himself leaves. Being up against two faves and all He even said that he wasnt exactly sure about the nominations so would be prepared to take the risk that rodrigo didnt vote in the way sophie said, which would mean it was 1v1 with him and marcus. If rod did vote that way, it was a 3 way... Would you of preferred him to nominate david? Whilst thinking that this would make sure marcus and david were up?(even though in reality it wouldnt have made a difference) Would that make you feel better? |
||
Reply With Quote |
25-08-2009, 11:58 PM | #21 | |||
|
||||
MissKittyFantastico
|
Quote:
Sophie and Rodrigo both pretty much told him they would never nominate him, he wouldn't expect Marcus to (and he didn't nom Marcus when he asked to be put up because he 'wanted to go home'). The only people he could guarantee getting a nomination from by asking would be Lisa, Charlie and David and that may not be enough to get him put up. That does sound like a pretty weak explanation I know, but it's the only one I can come up with. I'm not denying at all that this could all be a massive game plan on his part, and that he is trying to appear to be 'the nice guy with morals'. If that's the case it has backfired on him bigtime, but I do understand his reasoning for the most part, and fair play to him for having a game plan tbh. I still believe he's one of the nicer HM's this year, yes he's ****ed up and made mistakes but he's still a likeable character imo. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
25-08-2009, 11:59 PM | #22 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
To answer your question AhmedFan....
Siavash has siad this many times, and was trying to say it to the squealing hyenas last night if they listened, that he doesn't want a free ride to the finals, he would rather have EVERYONE up for eviction to see who the public would want to be there. When this was put to the other people in the house they were scared of being up so didn't go along with his plan as they knew they'd have a chacne of leaving. He knew this week that they wouldn't go along with it again so he was trying to orchestrate a situation were he could get the most people up ( including himself ). By calculating out who he thought would be nominated by everyone he brought it down to Himself, David and Marcus. So didn't nominate to get the most people up that he could. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
26-08-2009, 12:00 AM | #23 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
Reply With Quote |
26-08-2009, 12:00 AM | #24 | ||
|
|||
0_o
|
Quote:
Dont even attempt to twist the things I write Ahmed, it doesnt work. Nice try though, again. |
||
Reply With Quote |
26-08-2009, 12:00 AM | #25 | |||
|
||||
filthy mudblood
|
Siavash said if he asked people to nominate him, that would mean just him and Marcus up. How is that fair on Marcus?
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|