[masonbason]

Let me explain why...

Dont get me wrong, I love watchng big brother have done so, but my interest has always been on the psychological factor of big brother, seeing the dynamics of different people stuck together.

Watching on live tv the kind of people i would never come across in real life, seeing really interesting characters and see how they tick.

To me there can be no winner of the show, but if there should be one, the winner should be

1. the most entertaining
2. be an individual
3. have layers of complexity

But the problem of the show is that ultimately its a money making exercise for channel 4, now i dont dispute they shoudnt make money but they can in fact make more money rather than justs the phone lines.

This is the main problem is the format of the show, the processs of nomination and eviction are completely flawed, the show gets more and more boring reaching the final.

There can in my mind never be an intelligent winner cause intelligent people are easily outnumbered by the chavs and big brothers biggest market is the chavs.

I think the kind of reputation that is associated with big brother has destroyed itself.

To all those people who think Sophie does not deserve to win, remember who the show is aimed at and thats why we have Sophie as the winner.

I think one of the problem has been endemol cause i am sure channel 4 have no say in the format of the show.

I would like to see big brother in a different avatar or format, cause the idea of voyeurism of watching different people put together will be on tv even though big brother will be gone of channel 4 next year.