FAQ |
Members List |
Calendar |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
BB11 Channel 4's last Big Brother series started June 2010. Josie Gibson was the winner. All the gossip about the Big Brother 11 house, series and housemates here! |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
18-06-2010, 11:39 AM | #26 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
"they knew they was going to nominated fo bb11"?
Speak English boy i dont understand what your talking about? |
|||
Reply With Quote |
18-06-2010, 12:41 PM | #27 | |||
|
||||
Blue Waffle ¬_¬
|
Quote:
For some reason I just don't believe they knew for sure they were going in, however, I think certain things have been fixed in the past such as Latoya Jackson's private bedroom in CBB6. Never has BB carelessly left the bedroom unlocked on launch night yet she walks straight through it, opens another unlocked door, and there's her bed! Cheeky mare
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
18-06-2010, 01:03 PM | #28 | |||
|
||||
Viewer Emeritus
|
Quote:
As I said, Yeah, right! |
|||
Reply With Quote |
18-06-2010, 01:07 PM | #29 | ||
|
|||
User banned
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
18-06-2010, 01:16 PM | #30 | ||
|
|||
Banned
|
|
||
Reply With Quote |
18-06-2010, 01:27 PM | #31 | |||
|
||||
Blue Waffle ¬_¬
|
Quote:
I think the Golden HM in BB7 wasn't a fix but thought it strangely odd Susie was a stand-in HM for BB5, I can see where the conspiracy theories could arise from. But Mario being an actor just because he's the only gay sounds a bit desperate. BB1 had no gay male HMs, BB3 and BB4 didn't have any gay HMs at all
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
18-06-2010, 01:30 PM | #32 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
dumbass ******
|
||
Reply With Quote |
18-06-2010, 01:40 PM | #33 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
I dont really care, its probly fixed every year, you always notice that the people who go in the house have been on the telly/reality tv before.
__________________
Im A Celeb - 2010:
Love - Gillian And Stacey! |
|||
Reply With Quote |
18-06-2010, 01:43 PM | #34 | |||
|
||||
Blue Waffle ¬_¬
|
Or in the guniea pig trials. Imogen BB7 was in the CBB4 guinea pig trial run
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
18-06-2010, 01:43 PM | #35 | ||
|
|||
Senior Member
|
Quote:
What surprises me is that some on here actually believe that it wasnt all just a typical BB staged theatrical hogwash. Duh. |
||
Reply With Quote |
18-06-2010, 01:58 PM | #36 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Well i may not put commas where appropriate but atleast i can string a sentence together which actually makes sense.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
18-06-2010, 01:59 PM | #37 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
And i love how people are like talking as if THEY know for fact it was a fix.
The truth of the matter is NOONE knows for fact. So duh to you all Last edited by daniel-lewis-1985; 18-06-2010 at 01:59 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
18-06-2010, 02:05 PM | #38 | |||
|
||||
75% Trish
|
they should just pick 14 random people from the street...
'you want to go on big brother??' 'erm... ok!' why do they choose who goes in? i don't like that at all. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
18-06-2010, 02:12 PM | #39 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
They do pick people off the street to goto auditions
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
18-06-2010, 02:15 PM | #40 | |||
|
||||
75% Trish
|
auditions for what reason? just stick 'em in the house
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
18-06-2010, 02:16 PM | #41 | |||
|
||||
Blue Waffle ¬_¬
|
Quote:
BB2-3 were deliberately picked to 'up the ante' after the Nasty Nick drama so BB could be more like a soap opera BB4 was 'back to basics' BB5 was like a soap opera on crack But BB6-10 were blatant attention seekers, fame hungry wannabes etc I think BB11 is msot like BB5. The HMs are still abstract and picked to be entertaining but nowhere near as loud as the BB6-10 lot
__________________
Last edited by Mac Hiavellian; 18-06-2010 at 02:16 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
18-06-2010, 02:26 PM | #42 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
You cant just "stick 'em in the house"
Number 1 they need to see howthey react with other people and get to know them as characters to see if they would be good tv And number 2 they could be rapists or murderer So your idea fails |
|||
Reply With Quote |
18-06-2010, 02:27 PM | #43 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
And BB1 wasnt like that either. They advertised in newspapers and online and auditioned thousands of people before eventually picking the final 10
Last edited by daniel-lewis-1985; 18-06-2010 at 02:28 PM. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
18-06-2010, 02:44 PM | #44 | |||
|
||||
75% Trish
|
they could still be rapists and murderers anyway.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
18-06-2010, 02:57 PM | #45 | |||
|
||||
Blue Waffle ¬_¬
|
Obviously it was a social experiment so the producers had to consider who to stick in the house based on how HMs would interact (and that's why Ruth Wrigley deliberately didn't want to put black people and Nazis in the same house) but generally speaking, it was early days and so I think the BB1 HMs were average people you could expect to see on the streets.
And although there were audition processes, again, it was early days, no one knew what to expect from the show so it was pretty much trying to whittle down willing participants who seemed naturally entertaining
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
18-06-2010, 03:08 PM | #46 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
I didn't hear the convo the OP is on about but by the sounds of it and his post, he is clutching at straws!
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
18-06-2010, 03:11 PM | #47 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
The housemates are hand picked by BB in order to have some conflict in the house. The only thing I didn't understand is why they dragged 80 people down to the show when they knew exactly who was going in. Seems a tad unfair unless they were all in on it - that seems logical. Mario's entrance would have been more credible if the tombola box was see through and they proved that there were other names in there. Somehow, I think Mario was meant to go in. He didn't struggle with any of those tasks as the 'Mole'. Still great fun to watch.
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
18-06-2010, 03:16 PM | #48 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
He means actually pick people off the streets not have average people from the streets theres a difference.
And fruit cake they go through a rigorous audition process an have loads of physycological tests before they make it in the house in order for the producers to get rid of anyone unstable or phsyco so no its not the same as getting randomers off the streets |
|||
Reply With Quote |
18-06-2010, 03:20 PM | #49 | |||
|
||||
Blue Waffle ¬_¬
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|||
Reply With Quote |
18-06-2010, 03:22 PM | #50 | |||
|
||||
Senior Member
|
Wow conspiracy theorists really get carried away huh?
Ever think of this - Rachel told her friends she was going into the house, meaning she probably was, she could be. Maybe stating it with determination that she was. Being positive. Also note the genuine shock and surprise of people when they were picked. Can people not accept that for the first time ever the short listers found out at the same time as the viewers? It is actually a possible thing to do. It... is... not... impossible. |
|||
Reply With Quote |
Reply |
|
|