[Baggymad]

Great decision ......you can't fool the public.

[_Seth]

I have to agree.

[Vicky.]

I'm surprised, normally they evict the interesting ones.

Nice result

[Appearance_Of_A_Junky]

Originally Posted by Vicky.

I'm surprised, normally they evict the interesting ones.

Nice result

agreed, even if I did have money on Shabby going, but that was before JJ. Oh well, life goes on.

I did win on the premium bonds so its been a good week.

[Beso]

Post of the night..

[Baggymad]

Govan may start to look at himself and wonder if his influence has affected the public's opinion of Rachael

[854]

Originally Posted by Baggymad

Govan may start to look at himself and wonder if his influence has affected the public's opinion of Rachael

Don't blame govan. Blame blond douchebag for being a contradicting douche all the time in front of her.

He was friends with her. That's it.

[Appearance_Of_A_Junky]

Originally Posted by Baggymad

Govan may start to look at himself and wonder if his influence has affected the public's opinion of Rachael

Or will it just be the usual - attractive girl out first denial?

[Stacey.]

wrong decision.

the public were fooled by that Australian ****

[billy123]

Originally Posted by Stacey.x

wrong decision.

the public were fooled by that Australian ****

australian star? yes he is.

[Appearance_Of_A_Junky]

Originally Posted by Stacey.x

wrong decision.

the public were fooled by that Australian ****

Democracy in action.

We could say you were fooled by Rachel.

Stop with the hate and move on. bitterness will only make you a bitter person.

happy happy joy joy

[Stacey.]

Originally Posted by Appearance_Of_A_Junky

Democracy in action.

We could say you were fooled by Rachel.

Stop with the hate and move on. bitterness will only make you a bitter person.

happy happy joy joy

he's a nasty person though.

whether people like Rachael or not how did they not see through John?

[Appearance_Of_A_Junky]

Originally Posted by Stacey.x

he's a nasty person though.

whether people like Rachael or not how did they not see through John?

have you once stopped to consider, that even though JJ may have been over the top with the way he said it, that what he said was true.

And that many people agreed with what he said, not the manner, but the content.

Have you considered why people might agree with him?

Have you looked around you in the society that we live in and can see why many people think like this?

Interior Over Exterior.
Thought Over Image.

[Baggymad]

Originally Posted by Stacey.x

he's a nasty person though.

whether people like Rachael or not how did they not see through John?

I bet you are gutted, Rachael getting exposed so quickly, maybe if she hadn't been so quick to make a name for herself, gossiping with Gollum and actually being a nice person, she'd still be there.

Please don't tell me Gollum is your next favourite?

[Stacey.]

Originally Posted by Baggymad

I bet you are gutted, Rachael getting exposed so quickly, maybe if she hadn't been so quick to make a name for herself, gossiping with Gollum and actually being a nice person, she'd still be there.

Please don't tell me Gollum is your next favourite?

John did that for her.

so what they gave opinions on people?! everyone does that.

and yes. Govan's great. he speaks the truth.

[Jords]

Best outcome of the night!

[rusticgal]

Gollom is a little S**t stirrer...will twist the truth for his own gain. Ben has him sussed and seems to have taken JJ under his wing.
John is an upfront Aussie... but he is not rude. Scabbys rude....